KCI등재
형사재판에 있어서 아동증언의 증거능력 = A Study of the Evidence Admissibility of Child Testimony in Criminal Trial
저자
박종선 (백석대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2009
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
101-128(28쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
2
제공처
소장기관
A statement is very influential in criminal trial. In child testimony, it’s a matter of whether or not to admit a child’s statement. When a child states what he/she witnessed in court, it could be accepted as the data that form a judge’s conviction in principle. However, the problem comes down to the admissibility of the hearsay statement or documents. As a rule, the statements outside court will not be presented to the court. If they are reliable and worth as evidence, however, they are permitted to be presented to the court. In case of children, on the contrary, testifying what they saw or experienced in court could have a bad impact on their physical and mental health. In fact, it’s not easy to have a child appear and testify in court and make his/her statement admitted as evidence. What is worse, it’s really difficult to figure out what really happened because of too much restriction on evidence admissibility.
In this case, therefore, it appears reasonable if a court examines an expert’s opinion on a child’s mental and psychological conditions and his/her statements and comprehensively considers the child’s age, time lapse and the atmosphere when he/she was being interrogated after finding some reasonable reasons why he/she has not been able to appear in court. Furthermore, even though the video-taped child’s statement has been admitted as evidence because of the testimony of his/her guardian who was with him/her when he/she was being questioned, a court may find some reasonable reasons why the child can’t testify in court. In other words, if it’s been admitted that a child’s guardian who has maintained reliable relationship with the child unwittingly said what he was told from the child to one of his/her acquaintances, a court should admit it as evidence. In particular, considering the fact that video has been admitted as evidence with an advance in scientific technology, it could be regarded as an advance in new criminal procedure law. However, it’s a shame to fail to admit the videotape of child’s statement, which has been made during criminal investigation because of new regulation has not been enacted yet. As more children are recently victimized by crime, it’s time to admit a child’s statement as evidence provided that the vulnerability of a child’s statement is fully understood.
A statement is very influential in criminal trial. In child testimony, it’s a matter of whether or not to admit a child’s statement. When a child states what he/she witnessed in court, it could be accepted as the data that form a judge’s conviction in principle. However, the problem comes down to the admissibility of the hearsay statement or documents. As a rule, the statements outside court will not be presented to the court. If they are reliable and worth as evidence, however, they are permitted to be presented to the court. In case of children, on the contrary, testifying what they saw or experienced in court could have a bad impact on their physical and mental health. In fact, it’s not easy to have a child appear and testify in court and make his/her statement admitted as evidence. What is worse, it’s really difficult to figure out what really happened because of too much restriction on evidence admissibility.
In this case, therefore, it appears reasonable if a court examines an expert’s opinion on a child’s mental and psychological conditions and his/her statements and comprehensively considers the child’s age, time lapse and the atmosphere when he/she was being interrogated after finding some reasonable reasons why he/she has not been able to appear in court. Furthermore, even though the video-taped child’s statement has been admitted as evidence because of the testimony of his/her guardian who was with him/her when he/she was being questioned, a court may find some reasonable reasons why the child can’t testify in court. In other words, if it’s been admitted that a child’s guardian who has maintained reliable relationship with the child unwittingly said what he was told from the child to one of his/her acquaintances, a court should admit it as evidence. In particular, considering the fact that video has been admitted as evidence with an advance in scientific technology, it could be regarded as an advance in new criminal procedure law. However, it’s a shame to fail to admit the videotape of child’s statement, which has been made during criminal investigation because of new regulation has not been enacted yet. As more children are recently victimized by crime, it’s time to admit a child’s statement as evidence provided that the vulnerability of a child’s statement is fully understood.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.17 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.05 | 0.94 | 1.239 | 0.25 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)