KCI등재
SSCI
Does National Pension Service’s Trading Destabilize Korean Stock Market
저자
발행기관
학술지명
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies(Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies)
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재,SSCI
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
501-536(36쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
14
제공처
PIN, defined by Easley and O’Hara as the probability of information-based trading, has
been used as a proxy for private-information risk on individual stocks for various fields
of financial studies in the U.S. In this paper, we examine whether PIN is useful in understanding
the cross-sectional relationship between stock returns and private-information
risk in the Korean stock markets. Our analysis results indicate that the PIN is not useful;
therefore, we further examine to find out possible reasons for this and alternative ways
to measures private-information risk on individual stocks.
Our analyses are as follows.
•Using the method presented in Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O’Hara (2002, hereafter EHO),
we estimate PIN using intraday transaction data on individual stocks. Then, we analyze
the cross-sectional relationship between the estimated PIN and excess returns
using two methods. The first method analyzes the fifteen portfolios formed by firm
size and PIN. The second method uses an asset pricing model with beta, size,
book-to-market ratio, and PIN as explanatory variables. Then, a regression analysis
is conducted using the Fama and French (1992) method. To confirm the robustness
of our tests, we estimate PIN for a period of six-months prior and that of three-months
prior against the returns in the current period.
•Based on criticism against the EHO model by Duarte and Young (2007, hereafter
DY), we calculate the correlations between the number of buyer-initiated trades and that of seller-initiated trades in the Korea Exchange (KRX). Then, we compare them
with the correlations inherent in the EHO and DY (2007) models.
•We estimate adjusted PIN (AdjPIN) using intraday transaction data on individual
stocks and conduct the same cross-sectional analyses as we have done with the PIN.
The sample period of the data is from January 1997 to December 2005. The sample
stocks are common stocks listed on the Securities Market Division of the KRX which have
been traded during more than 60 days a year.
We obtain the following results. First, the cross-sectional relationship between PIN and
portfolio excess returns is economically insignificant when we analyze the relationship using
PIN estimated from last year’s data and the firm size measured by market capitalization
at the end of the previous year. In contrast, AdjPIN generally has an economically
significant relationship with portfolio excess returns. Second, reducing the estimation interval
for PIN to a quarter does not help in explaining portfolio returns. Only when we analyze
the relationship between PIN in the current period and current portfolio returns, then
do we understand their relationship being positive and statistically significant. This indicates
that generally the PIN does not explain portfolio returns, but only useful for detecting
the private-information risk that occurs during an extremely short period of time.
Third, the KRX data reflects positive correlations between buyer-initiated trade and seller-
initiated trade. However, the EHO-PIN model reflects negative ones, whereas the
DY-AdjPIN model shows the same positive correlations as the real world results from using
KRX data. This indicates that the EHO model should be revised in order to explain the
empirically stylized facts found in both the KRX and US exchanges. Fourth, in contrast
to PIN, the relationship between AdjPIN and portfolio excess returns is statistically significant
at a 1% level from cross-sectional regressions. Although the AdjPIN does not explain
the stock returns in NYSE and AMEX in DY (2007), it does seem to do so in the
KRX; a difference of 10 percentage points in AdjPIN between two stocks amounts to the
difference in required rate of returns of 1.20 percent per month.
PIN, defined by Easley and O’Hara as the probability of information-based trading, has
been used as a proxy for private-information risk on individual stocks for various fields
of financial studies in the U.S. In this paper, we examine whether PIN is useful in understanding
the cross-sectional relationship between stock returns and private-information
risk in the Korean stock markets. Our analysis results indicate that the PIN is not useful;
therefore, we further examine to find out possible reasons for this and alternative ways
to measures private-information risk on individual stocks.
Our analyses are as follows.
•Using the method presented in Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O’Hara (2002, hereafter EHO),
we estimate PIN using intraday transaction data on individual stocks. Then, we analyze
the cross-sectional relationship between the estimated PIN and excess returns
using two methods. The first method analyzes the fifteen portfolios formed by firm
size and PIN. The second method uses an asset pricing model with beta, size,
book-to-market ratio, and PIN as explanatory variables. Then, a regression analysis
is conducted using the Fama and French (1992) method. To confirm the robustness
of our tests, we estimate PIN for a period of six-months prior and that of three-months
prior against the returns in the current period.
•Based on criticism against the EHO model by Duarte and Young (2007, hereafter
DY), we calculate the correlations between the number of buyer-initiated trades and that of seller-initiated trades in the Korea Exchange (KRX). Then, we compare them
with the correlations inherent in the EHO and DY (2007) models.
•We estimate adjusted PIN (AdjPIN) using intraday transaction data on individual
stocks and conduct the same cross-sectional analyses as we have done with the PIN.
The sample period of the data is from January 1997 to December 2005. The sample
stocks are common stocks listed on the Securities Market Division of the KRX which have
been traded during more than 60 days a year.
We obtain the following results. First, the cross-sectional relationship between PIN and
portfolio excess returns is economically insignificant when we analyze the relationship using
PIN estimated from last year’s data and the firm size measured by market capitalization
at the end of the previous year. In contrast, AdjPIN generally has an economically
significant relationship with portfolio excess returns. Second, reducing the estimation interval
for PIN to a quarter does not help in explaining portfolio returns. Only when we analyze
the relationship between PIN in the current period and current portfolio returns, then
do we understand their relationship being positive and statistically significant. This indicates
that generally the PIN does not explain portfolio returns, but only useful for detecting
the private-information risk that occurs during an extremely short period of time.
Third, the KRX data reflects positive correlations between buyer-initiated trade and seller-
initiated trade. However, the EHO-PIN model reflects negative ones, whereas the
DY-AdjPIN model shows the same positive correlations as the real world results from using
KRX data. This indicates that the EHO model should be revised in order to explain the
empirically stylized facts found in both the KRX and US exchanges. Fourth, in contrast
to PIN, the relationship between AdjPIN and portfolio excess returns is statistically significant
at a 1% level from cross-sectional regressions. Although the AdjPIN does not explain
the stock returns in NYSE and AMEX in DY (2007), it does seem to do so in the
KRX; a difference of 10 percentage points in AdjPIN between two stocks amounts to the
difference in required rate of returns of 1.20 percent per month.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | KCI등재 |
2009-09-04 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 증권학회지 -> Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 학술지 분리 (기타) | KCI등재 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | SSCI 등재 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.6 | 0.35 | 0.51 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.52 | 0.51 | 0.716 | 0 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)