KCI등재
조선,청조의 조공관계와 외교질서 -『중국역대조공제도연구』의 비판적 분석 = Tribute Relation and Diplomatic Order of Joseon and Ching Dynasty -Critical Analysis of Research on Historical Tribute Systems of China and Korea
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2011
작성언어
Korean
주제어
KDC
001.3
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
321-351(31쪽)
제공처
소장기관
The reason why the forms of two nations` exchange as well as the contents of it in the relation between Joseon and Ching Dynasty need attentions is because that way, the forms revealed on the surface and the practical contents can be different. In analyzing the writings on the relation of the two nations, it is important to review if the terminologies such as ``tribute``, ``Feudal suzerainty`` and ``Fan-shu`` were accurately used. If considering this point, the problems the writings of Pu, baichen have are clear. He takes Feudal suzerainty based on the tribute system as the basic frame to analyze and state the relation of Joseon and Ching Dynasty. However, the tribute system displays its false in that it the relation with Joseon was analyzed through the regulation of Ching Dynasty, and when referring to the relation of Feudal suzerainty(宗藩), 藩 means Fan-shu(藩部) and is not an accurate term in the aspect that it has a different meaning from the meaning of 藩 in the earlier periods. Eventually, Pu, baichen was using the terminology, Feudal suzerainty which does not exactly reflect the tribute system or the time instead of the tribute relation, and this led his writings to flow as focused on Ching Dynasty. The problems found in his writings are largely two. First, Pu, baichen insisted that Ching Dynasty was very considerate of Joseon. He claimed that Ching Dynasty requested a lot of tributes in the beginning stage, but the quantity gradually reduced as they were politically stabilized, and when Joseon suffered from the famine, Ching Dynasty sent the foods and threw the dispensations. Also, he insisted that Ching Dynasty made a promise to militarily protect Joseon from Japan and the domestic affairs and the diplomacy could enjoy a considerable freedom. However, Pu, baichen overlooked the following matters. The political stabilization of Joseon in the standpoint of Ching Dynasty was directly related to the stabilization of own nation`s border regions. Because of this, it is natural to interpret that since it was considered that the requests for numerous tributes and the excessive political interferences could trigger the unwanted distributes and the quantity of the tributes was reduced. Next, by focusing on the responsibility of Japan in the procedure in that the tribute relation was broken, he tried to hide the fact that Ching Dynasty could not cope with the changed situation. The Chino-Japanese War was the incident happened as Ching and Joseon fought to exert exclusive influences, and the people of Joseon suffered material loss due to the war. We consider that both Ching Dynasty and Japan are not freed from the responsibilities in the war, however Pu, baichen insisted as following; Japan could not hide their warlike nature and incursive expansionist policies and invoked the war, and Ching Dynasty encouraged the conclusion of the treaty between Joseon and foreign nations in order to protect Joseon from the danger. The writings dealing with the relation of Joseon and Ching Dynasty can be evaluated by the criteria such as ① if the standpoints of both sides are properly reflected, ② if the collapse reasons of the tribute relation are clearly listed, and ③ if the tribute relation is being analyzed in the viewpoint of Ching Dynasty of Manchuria people. According to these criteria, it is because the writings of Pu, baichen cannot be evaluated as properly analyzing the relation of Joseon and Ching. He reflected only the standpoint of one nation, and blame the third nations for the collapse of the tribute relation, and the standpoint of Ching Dynasty for the Manchuria people was not considered. Even though his writings has the strength in that the forms and procedures of the tribute relation are dealt in detain, these problems found do not allow for him to avoid the criticism that he presented a deflective point of view.
더보기분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)