KCI등재
제삼세게 영화의 정체성과 가능성: 프레드릭 제임슨의 "민족적 알레고리" 개념의 재고 = Identity and potentiality of the Third World Cinema: Rethinking Fredric Jameson's Idal of "National Allegory"
저자
남수영 (한국예술종합학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
307-334(28쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
3
제공처
In the current configuration of post-modern cultural politics, all countries except the United States are considered as the third world, constituting the third culture. This also partly explains the decline of post-colonial discourse, which has focused on the relations between the first and the third worlds, the center and periphery and the Western subject and the colonial subjects. It is because the strong marginality the third culture once had tends to be obliterated in the name of the post-modern global culture. From this understanding, it is worthwhile to reconsider the infamous argument of Fredric Jameson: "all third-world texts are necessarily allegorical, and they are to be read as national allegories." The apparent essentialism and the very desire for generality in his wording (and the following totalizing effect on patterns of discourse on third world cultural products) have invited rigorous polemics. Among them, it is especially worth remembering Aijaz Amad's insistence that the proper discourse on the third world can be neither directed by such dogmatic guideline nor represented by scholars who have been educated in the West. However, I would like to focus on Jameson’s short response to Amad’s refutation, in which Jameson explains that his contention was in fact addressed to the first world, and intended to offer a way of conceptualizing the relationship of politics and literary activities. To be more specific, he wants to intervene in the first world literary and critical situation in which the individual psychology dominates interpretive modes as well as productive drives, thereby blurring the potentiality for political awareness and actions.
By reading Jameson closely, with two exemplary interpretations of Ju Dou (Zhang Yimou, 1989/1990) and Lust, Caution (Ang Lee, 2007), this essay reveals that the concept of national allegory plays an ambivalent role for the discourse of the third world in the present time. In other words, this study proves that the third world can function as a space that remains untainted by and oppositional to those repressive social processes which have homogenized the real and imaginative terrain of the western subject. Realizing such function of the third world (and its interpretive links with nationhood) will be a necessary step for us in playing a significant role in formulating the global culture, either in the middle of mainstream or as a centripetal force of the periphery.
Lastly, revealing the validity of "national allegory" for the third world discourse is not to advocate its absolute value or truth, but to try another productive interpretive mode working for both the first and the third worlds, if, that is, there is still valid demarcation between them. Experiment on this ambivalent and alternative methodology of national allegorization is necessary only to prove the possibility of subversion in the awareness of Otherness and the realization of oscillating value in relations, which is much stronger than any dogmatic guideline.
In the current configuration of post-modern cultural politics, all countries except the United States are considered as the third world, constituting the third culture. This also partly explains the decline of post-colonial discourse, which has focused on the relations between the first and the third worlds, the center and periphery and the Western subject and the colonial subjects. It is because the strong marginality the third culture once had tends to be obliterated in the name of the post-modern global culture. From this understanding, it is worthwhile to reconsider the infamous argument of Fredric Jameson: "all third-world texts are necessarily allegorical, and they are to be read as national allegories." The apparent essentialism and the very desire for generality in his wording (and the following totalizing effect on patterns of discourse on third world cultural products) have invited rigorous polemics. Among them, it is especially worth remembering Aijaz Amad's insistence that the proper discourse on the third world can be neither directed by such dogmatic guideline nor represented by scholars who have been educated in the West. However, I would like to focus on Jameson’s short response to Amad’s refutation, in which Jameson explains that his contention was in fact addressed to the first world, and intended to offer a way of conceptualizing the relationship of politics and literary activities. To be more specific, he wants to intervene in the first world literary and critical situation in which the individual psychology dominates interpretive modes as well as productive drives, thereby blurring the potentiality for political awareness and actions.
By reading Jameson closely, with two exemplary interpretations of Ju Dou (Zhang Yimou, 1989/1990) and Lust, Caution (Ang Lee, 2007), this essay reveals that the concept of national allegory plays an ambivalent role for the discourse of the third world in the present time. In other words, this study proves that the third world can function as a space that remains untainted by and oppositional to those repressive social processes which have homogenized the real and imaginative terrain of the western subject. Realizing such function of the third world (and its interpretive links with nationhood) will be a necessary step for us in playing a significant role in formulating the global culture, either in the middle of mainstream or as a centripetal force of the periphery.
Lastly, revealing the validity of "national allegory" for the third world discourse is not to advocate its absolute value or truth, but to try another productive interpretive mode working for both the first and the third worlds, if, that is, there is still valid demarcation between them. Experiment on this ambivalent and alternative methodology of national allegorization is necessary only to prove the possibility of subversion in the awareness of Otherness and the realization of oscillating value in relations, which is much stronger than any dogmatic guideline.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2019-08-06 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Korean Association Of Literature And Film -> The Korean Association Of Literature and Film | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.2 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.23 | 0.26 | 0.491 | 0.04 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)