도산사건의 실증적 연구와 법원의 역할 - 개인도산사건을 중심으로 - = The Empirical Studies on Bankruptcy Cases and the Role of the Court - Focused on Personal Bankruptcy Cases -
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2021
작성언어
-주제어
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
1-377(377쪽)
제공처
Compared to general civil laws and criminal laws, bankruptcy laws have more concern on promoting the policy of rehabilitation and revitalization of individuals and the national economy, than on adjudicating “right or wrong”. Bankruptcy laws are also intended to balance such policy effects with the rights of creditors who would lose their claims in the bankruptcy process. In order to examine if bankruptcy laws has served and will be serving the intended functions of these policies, this research focuses on the current status and challenges of empirical studies on such policy-oriented bankruptcy legislation.
With this purpose in mind, this research first examines the U.S. Consumer Bankruptcy Project (CBP). The CBP is a series of empirical studies on consumer bankruptcy that were conducted on a large scale, five times, from 1980 to 2015 and has been considered as an exemplary model of empirical research on consumer bankruptcy. Investigators of the CBP collected and analyzed data to address various research agendas, which have been also utilized by many other researchers for their individual studies. In addition, this research reviews other various domestic and foreign empirical studies. Implications could be derived from the research agendas and methodologies used by these studies, which may shed some lights on how to develop empirical research in Korea.
For the development of the bankruptcy system in Korea, more empirical research needs to be conducted in the future. The court is critical in fostering an environment for this empirical research because it has records of bankruptcy cases, which are the most important data in empirical research, and it has the relevant expertise gained from overseeing bankruptcy cases.
As an example of empirical research conducted by the court, the Seoul Rehabilitation Court has been working on establishing database that can be the basis for empirical research. This important work has been, however, conducted by full-time judges, trustees in bankruptcy, and personal rehabilitation commissioners as their schedule permits. Considering that academia has long appealed to the court for the need of empirical data for the development of the bankruptcy system through more empirical research in Korea, measures to ensure that the current works of the Seoul Rehabilitation Court continue and expand nationwide need to be devised.
Given the importance of the role of the court in fostering empirical research in this area, lessons could be found from the U.S. Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), which lays the responsibility of collecting empirical data on federal courts. Having such a provision may not be necessary for courts in Korea to establish a database for empirical research; however, having such a provision could have unnecessary debates avoided on the role of the court and provide legislative ground for securing budgets and personnels.
If conditions allow, the court could also consider adopting research agendas and conducting full-fledged empirical research by itself. Under the current organization structure of the Judiciary of Korea, the Judicial Policy Research Institute (JPRI) would be an appropriate institution that carries out such tasks; however, the JPRI would need to recruit and retain professional researchers with expertise in empirical studies in advance.
If empirical studies are conducted by the court, the method and scope of publication of research results also need to be considered. In particular, decision-makers would need to discuss and decide whether the research results would be open to public; and if so, they would need to decide how they would be made available and whether a translated version in major foreign languages such as English would be provided.
In order to reduce the workload caused by empirical research, the electronic system of the court needs to be improved to computerize court records and facilitate data retrieval. It is suggested to expand the e-Form reporting system by trustees in bankruptcy nationwide, to introduce the e-Form system even in personal rehabilitation procedures, and to take measures to automatically extract data from formalized forms in consideration of the growing number of electronic lawsuits.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)