KCI등재
경영판단행위에 대한 배임죄의 적용 -중소기업사례를 중심으로- = Applying breach of trust against directors` acts in business -Focused on Supreme Court decisions in the area of small businesses-
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2013
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
300
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
871-905(35쪽)
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
Directors of corporations face liability risks from the inappropriate investment. Directors who breach their duties to the corporation may be liable if the corporation suffers a loss that can be directly attributed to their commissions or omissions. Liability of directors in this regard may arise as a result of their failure. The business judgment rule is an assumption that in making a business decision, the directors of a corporation acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company. The business judgment rule is a U.S. case law, derived concept in corporations` law. Given that the directors cannot ensure corporate success, the business judgment rule specifies that the court will not review the business decisions of directors who performed their duties in good faith, with the care and in the reasonable belief that their actions are in the corporation`s best interest. The business judgment rule performs a function favor of the directors, freeing from possible liability for decisions that result in harm to the corporation. Although several decisions have held that the rule is available to directors, commentators are divided as to whether the business judgment rule is available to director. The Korean Supreme Court accepted partially the business judgment rule in Breach of Trust cases. Some commentators have stated the opposite. As the Supreme Court has said, in the inherently risky environment of business, the directors need to be free to take legal liability affecting their judgment if the directors of a corporation acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company. As part of directors` duties, which includes both a fiduciary duty, and a duty of reasonable care, directors have a duty not to waste corporate assets. The court held that directors of a corporation have an obligation to apply property towards the rational objects of the corporation. This duty includes not undertaking an unauthorized business purpose. The consequence of a breach of such a duty is that the transaction is voidable by the company. The duties and liabilities of directors are governed by statute. Failure to properly perform these duties may render a director criminally liable to pay damages. Also the consistent decision in the area of small businesses emphasizes the fiduciary responsibility of directors of corporations. Any loss of assets due to the malfeasance or failure to act of the directors could make the directors liable for possibly breach of trust. The case also includes the business judgment rule which states that if a director has applied reasonable care, has a basis for believing that the decision made was in the best interest of the company, the director will not be held liable for a breach of duty. This is only if a director did not act in bad faith or for improper purpose. Under the Criminal Law, the business judgment rule is not yet the offspring of the fundamental principle, that the business and affairs of a corporation are managed by directors. In addition, its notable facet is that some directors` decisions lie outside the business judgment rule. Furthermore, courts may apply the more stringent test, requiring a director when acting as a director in good faith and for a proper purpose, in the best interests of the company, with the degree of care. Consequently, one of the points of review that has entered the business judgment rule was the prohibition against duty of loyalty violation. The law imposes fiduciary culpabilities to ensure that authority is exercised responsibly. Directors in a business should act in good faith, in the best interests of the corporation. By implementing reasonable and rational decision, directors reduce the risk of liabilities for breach of trust.
더보기분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)