KCI등재
아버지 상의 사적(私的)변화 양상 : 90년대 이후 소설을 중심으로 = The aspects of private change on father’s feature - Based on the novel since in the 1990s
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2010
작성언어
Korean
주제어
KDC
809
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
191-220(30쪽)
제공처
소장기관
The problems on father and son has been many themes for literature work regardless of the East and the West as well as acient and modern times. Especially the existence of father is the first important character in human’s mind and the subject representing standard of life. Traditional concept focusing on outside by father has been influenced on our lives while such a father’s feature has been become to ‘lost existence’ in the 20th century. However, father’s existence is still in realities of life. Also it is certain that it does not exist. as there is substance of father while there is an absence as public existence.
The discourse on ‘Father’, which is called ‘Oidipus’, is considered as the absolute one in Korean literature. ‘Father has not only the personal/biological meaning but also symbolic meaning of law/ ruler/truth/super-ego and so on. The son’s perspective on ‘Father’ can be revealed through ‘Oidipus Complex’-the fear of castration, an illegitimate child or adopted child.
I would like to suggest that the discourse on ‘Father-Son’ relationship in Korean literature has assumed the new aspect from 1980’s to 1990’s through 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 by Kim So Jin. The feature of Father in 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉 is ‘who is spiritless personal being in public’, which is revealed by the job of mating dogs. The son in 1980’s Korean literature is trying to make new feature of Father by denying one’s father or castrating the being. But the try would be transfered to ‘Sympathy’ by understanding/experiencing the inability of one’s father who has suffered from the state of war and has lost his hometown and had to survive. ‘The new feature of Father’ has created in mid-90’s Korean literature. The discourse on “Father” is no longer “public being” but is “private being” in 1990’s Korean literature. But it is not easy to repatriat to completed father.
When the Cold war system was falling down and the Postmodernism was emerging, the father was falling deeper by women writers who never took a key role before. The 2000s has come but the father has not been able to return where they used to belong. In 2005, the father finally regained what they used to have through the book 〈Run Father〉 written by Kim, Aae Ran but it could be done by using ‘imagination’. There are abitdifferences between the 2000 sand the 90s.The father is taking back by the daughter. For the father who is not a public enemy anymore, the illegitimate daughter, who were thinking of putting sunglasses on the father, finalized having the father retuning back with sympathy. There turning back of the father is not taking hard, refuse neither eradication but things are not so different. This could happen since everybody around is warm of the father. The father just needs tool.
In 2008, father returns back by 〈Father’s Privacy〉 written by Seo Ha Jin. But fater comes back as ‘a representative family’. Such a father shows his personal life by 〈Mask〉. Even Masked Father using mask, he can not be satisfied with equality between gender society. He needs more life- energy so writer sublimates an affair in sympathy but father still needs mask to have personal life.
Overall, we look over change of personal father figure from after 90’s Korean novels. Interesting thing is that Change of Stature of Father has been affected by many external aspects. Moreover, in returning of father, presence of father has been changed by external views of sons or daughters, itself. Therefore, we cannot deny that external aspects of Father affect rebuilding of father figure rather than change of father itself. In the way of returning of father, Father becomes 〈Kaeheulaekkun〉, 〈Running Father〉 and 〈Father in Mask〉, eventually. Once we can judge that position of father is insignificant and pity throughout them, it is important that change of others’ point of view takes priority for acceptance of father. At the age of the father with the existance and absence but does not revert to patriarchal discipline, hope
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)