중국소비자들의 식품첨가물에 대한 인식. 지식 및 태도에 관한 연구
저자
발행사항
대전: 忠南大學校 大學院, 2016
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사)-- 忠南大學校 大學院: 소비자생활정보학과 소비자생활정보 전공 2016. 8
발행연도
2016
작성언어
한국어
DDC
640 판사항(22)
발행국(도시)
대전
기타서명
Chinese Consumers' Perception, Knowledge and Attitude on Food Additives
형태사항
52 p.: 삽화; 26 cm.
일반주기명
충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
지도교수: 이준호
부록: 1. 한국어 설문지 -- 2. 중국어 설문지
참고문헌 : p. 32-33
소장기관
This research was conducted to investigate the perception, knowledge and attitude on food additives of adult Chinese consumers, who were living in Beijing, Shenyang, Guangzhou and Zhengzhou. Data was collected from 419 questionnaires in May 20 to June 20, 2015. The results were as following.
1. The demographic characteristics of respondents
The majority of the respondents were female(58.7%), married(73.3%) and 30's(32.5%). The educational level that showed most was university graduated (58.5%). The profession was in the order of office workers(19.1%),
self-employment(16%). Monthly income on average was in the order of 3000-4000 Yuan(31.3%), 2000-3000 Yuan(19.6%) and the monthly food expenditure on average was in the order of 500-1000 Yuan(29.6%), 1000-1500(26%).
2. perception on the foods containing food additives
The general average of perception on food additives was 2.19 out of 4. ‘Degree of risk on excessive intake of food additives’(3.71) was highest, ‘perception of the legal base and management system’(2.99), ‘perception about food additives’(2.91), ‘Degree of perception on food labeling’(2.41). For 'degree of risk on excessive intake of food additives,' married showed significantly lower than unmarried(P<0.01). For 'level of perception on food labeling', married showed significantly higher than unmarried(P<0.01), 'level of perception of the legal and management system' showed that married was significantly lower than unmarried(P<0.001). on 'level of awareness of the legal and management system', 40’s(2.91) and 20’s(3.17) showed significantly higher than 30’s(2.9)(p<0.05). For consumer education demand, ‘Degree of risk on excessive intake of food additives’ high school graduated showed significantly lower than others(P <0.01), For ‘perception of the legal base and management system', high school graduated showed significantly lower than postgraduate(P<0.05). On ‘perception for safety of food additives’, 'ordinary' share(31%) was the most one, followed by' generally is not the case'(30%) and 'substantially true'(26%). In the answer for 'Food containg a lot of food additives', 'milk and dairy products' share(20.5%) which the largest proportion. 'Stringent system of government' was the top share(66.1%) in ‘for safe reasons of food additives'. 'Uneasy feeling for chemicals' has the largest proportion(37.4%) in the 'unsafe reasons on food additives'.
The general average of perception for food additives was 3.17 out of 5, where
'The education and propaganda for food additives are need' share(4.28) was the most choice.
In age, ' The education and propaganda for food additives are need' under 40’s showed significantly higher than 50’s(P<0.01). 'Processed food requires food additives' 20’s showed significantly higher than 40’s(P<0.05).
For education, 'I eat foods with additives' respondents of high school graduated showed significantly lower than others(P<0.05), ' The education and propaganda for food additives are need', high school and university graduated showed significantly higher than others(P<0.001), 'uncontrolled use of food additives' high school showed significantly lower than others(P<0.05), 'food additives have risk and benefits together' showed that postgraduate was significantly higher than high school graduated(P<0.05).
3. The knowledge of food additives
For the percentage of correct answers to the question regarding food additives knowledge, 'excessive use of food additives is harmless' was 78.3%, which accounted for the largest proportion. To the question 'nutritional supplements (calcium) have set in use criteria', the correct answers percentage was 15.5%, which the lowest proportion of correct rate. 'Food additives designated by government have continued security' was 48.4%, which was the highest error rate in the 10 issues.
To the question 'what is a harmless food additive in human?' the correct answer rate responded as 'nutritional supplements' was 33.4%, which was generally low.
4. The purchasing attitude to food additives
The general average of purchasing attitude to food additives was 3.14 out of 4. ‘Colorant’(3.38) was the highest, ‘Fragrant agent’(3.3), ‘synthetic preservative’
(3.28), ‘artificial color’(3.23), ‘artificial sweetener’(3.23), ‘Chemical seasoning’ (3.2), ‘Oxidation inhibitor’(3.05), ‘bleach’(3.04).
In age, ‘Chemical seasoning’ over 50’s respondents showed significantly higher than20’s and 30’s(P<0.05). ‘Artificial sweetener’ and artificial color showed that 20’s respondents was significantly lower than 40’s(P<0.01). ‘Synthetic preservative’ showed that 20’s respondents significantly lower than over 40’s(P<0.01).
For education, ‘artificial color’ and ‘Oxidation inhibitor’ showed that postgraduate was significantly lower than others(P<0.01).
On the consumers' trust level for the institute offering information of food additives, the general average point was 3.01 out of 5. For the trust level on institutes provided information, university and institutes(3.46) was the highest of all.
In age, ‘food and drug administration’ showed that 40’s respondents(2.98) was significantly lower than others(P<0.05), ‘hospital’ 20’s respondents(3.26) showed significantly higher than others(P<0.001), ‘canteen’ 40’s respondents(1.98) showed significantly lower than others(P<0.01).
For education, ‘University and research institution’ showed that middle school graduated(2.9) was significantly lower than others(P<0.01), ‘canteen’ showed that middle school graduated was significantly higher than others(P<0.05).
For the consumer psychology and action for food additives, the general average point was 3.66 out of 5. ‘Want to understand food additive information’ (4.19) was the highest, which was followed by ‘afraid to eat food containing additives’(3.87), ‘food additives disturbed on the human body’(3.85), ‘check the food labeling carefully when buy food’(3.33).
Except for 'satisfactory for food labeling,' the others showed that married was significantly higher than unmarried. For education, 'Want to understand food additive information' middle school graduated showed significantly lower than others(P<0.01). In occupation, 'Want to understand food additive information' and ‘food additives disturbed on the human body’ showed that middle school graduated was significantly lower than other occupations(P<0.01, P<0.05). ‘check the food labeling carefully when buy food’ housewife and other occupation showed significantly higher than students and self-employment (P<0.05).
5. knowledge and information acquisition on food additives
The primary sources which Chinese consumers obtain food additives information were in the order of ‘TV, radio’(60.1%), 'internet’(41.5%), 'handbook’(40.6%). The most concerned Information for respondents are the safety of food additives (64.0%). The main obstacle to obtain the food additives and relevant information is 'inadequacy of government advocacy and policy imperfections'(32.0%). There were 33.2% of respondents experienced security incidents caused by food additives.
From the above results, Chinese consumers payed more attention to security issues caused by food additives. Especially older respondents kept aloof to buy foods with additives. Information acquisition on food additives rely mainly on television, radio and other traditional media. The most concern of Chinese consumers on food additives was safety of them. The information related food additives were lack owing to inadequacy of government propaganda and related policy. The consumer have more confidence on universities and research institutes than food companies and canteen in China.
Accordingly, the food producing, manufacturing and distributing companies must have a sense of responsibility for the consumers’ safe dietary life. Also, in order to raise the trust level of the consumers towards the Chinese government’s food safety policies, consistent supervision, and management must take food related companies.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)