不動産執行에 의한 所有權變動에 관한 硏究 = (A)study on the change of ownership by the realty execution
Korea divides the compulsory execution of realty into auction process under the Civil Execution Act and public auction process under the National Tax Collection Law. The court of execution proceeds the auction based on the Civil Execution to realize the private individual's claim for feasance of private law. On the other side, when the property owner doesn't perform the liability to taxation, the tax office which is the tax collection office proceeds the public auction under the National Tax Collection Law, on the basis of this delinquency.
Civil execution process under the Civil Execution Act and delinquency process under the National Tax Collection Law, as these process have the commonness on the side of realization of monetary bond by government, have serious problem since the auction which is the legal disposal and the public auction by delinquency disposal toward the same property are reiteratively disposed. However we don't have any legal basis that settles these both process or makes the system; which plays a role of the bridge between them and unifies them to proceed.
The auction or the public auction have three steps to proceed. First is distress process, second is encashment process and last step third, allotment(distribution) process ends the execution procedures. These procedures make the change of the realty right by public power of the government without the intention of the owner or the obligator. Imagine that each related-organizations take these process toward one same land or building to realize their own purpose. Process 'Execution' occurs and is disposed a lot as the nation gets developed or the economy fluctuates. Therefore this execution causes the waist of time, efforts and money and even the legal side effect and the confusion of ownership's change which is pivotal in realty right's change as the side effects or evil of this procedures appear on the surface.
In the case of the disposal of realty or the transfer of ownership registry commission under the civil execution process on the concrete, the whole disposal procedures by the civil execution come to nothing as the ownership has been already acquired through the public auction step based on the National Tax Collection Law and vice versa without exception. This is the reason why the steps that prevent from conflict of both process and improve the relation between them are required when the civil execution and the delinquency disposal toward the same property concur.
This thesis is developed as follows. In chapterⅠ, I explained the purpose, method and category of these studies.
In chapter Ⅱ, I reviewed the auction process about property under the Civil Execution Act. I arranged this chapter to compare with the contents not considered in public auction step under the National Tax Collection Law through reviewing newly-established Civil Execution Act by titles. Especially I focused on the contents that greatly complement problems and introduce new system under the old law: the side of allotment demand, bid process diversification, the allotment, etc.
In chapter Ⅲ, I reviewed the process of delinquent's real distress that is preceding process of public auction under the International Tax Collection Law and also looked back on the request for share distribution and participation in attachment. I reflected on the problems and evil that were produced through the public auction process and the liquidation process. Especially I also focus on the right of equality along with the property right if any unconstitutional fact exists due to the defect of public announcement system for public auction and the exclusion of general obligees from allotment process.
In chapter Ⅳ, I looked over the difference by way of legalistic comparison with priority given to conflict of change of ownership and the problem by means of practical cases in the executive organ's application of dualistic system in the case of the problem happening through both auction process under the Civil Execution Act and public auction process under the National Tax Collection Law. Relating to this, I also went through whether the legislative cases that can settle these both process exist or not. I also reviewed how the problem comes out due to the defect of public announcement system for public auction regarding the effect of public announcement of execution beginning decision. Moreover I analysed the difference between the auction and the public auction for the last step of executive process: the side of allotment demand, the effect of obligees' bond statement submitting and the problems coming from both process regarding the allotment order decision. I determined the source and the base of these problems to find solutions and their roles of a bridge between two process.
Laying a scheme to solve the problems and evil happening through the auction of the Civil Execution Act and the public auction of the National Tax Collection Law as I have stated until now, in chapter Ⅴ, I asserted the unification of executive organs as de lege ferenda, the use of realty public auction's announcement system and the revision or the establishment of the new National Tax Collection Law to unify the allotment system. After all, even if there is only one target realty, executive organs are divided as they execute. This resulted in the execution for one target realty by two executive organs. Unfortunately even the case of supreme court says that the executive organs have no choice but to proceed separately in the basis of the defect of neutral settlement law or act between both process insofar as there are separate organs and laws or acts.
As we went through the legislative cases, we didn't reach the conclusion whether we unify the executive organs like Germany or make the third law like Japan, which is called 'the Law about the settlement of delinquent disposal and compulsory execution' to settle both process. Executive process is the decisive disposal which has an effect immediately and this process is connected with considerable danger and complexity. So establishing new law for settlement of both process may not be the fundamental solution. With the importance of the executive process, we should prepare the stable and equal executive process to protect the people's property and right. In this thesis, I try to solve the problems and confusion of the executive process through the introduction of public announcement system for the public auction system and the unification of the way of realizing property.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 수탁업체 콘소시엄 기관명 및 위탁기간 명시 | · 제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁) 구체화 |
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 |
보유기간 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 | 한국교육학술정보원법 정보추제 동의 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
| 선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 | |||
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)