장애노인의 삶의 질 영향요인 분석 = Analysis on factors influencing quality of life in the elderly with disability
저자
발행사항
광주 : 조선대학교, 2008
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 행정학과 사회복지학전공 , 2008
발행연도
2008
작성언어
한국어
KDC
338.6 판사항(4)
DDC
362.6 판사항(21)
발행국(도시)
광주
형태사항
x, 205 p. ; 26 cm
일반주기명
참고문헌: p. 150-175
소장기관
ABSTRACT
Analysis on Factors Influencing Quality of Life
in the Elderly with Disability
Kim, Hyeong-Soo
Advisor: Prof. Kim, Yong-Seob, Ph. D.
Department of Public Administration
Graduate School of Chosun University
This study is focused on the relationship between cause and effect on how self-efficacy and daily life ability as external variable and parameter variable of individual factor, environment factor and society integration factor among variables which affect the quality of life of the elderly with disability affect the quality of life. This study pays attention to the rise of political and practical interest on the quality of life of the elderly with disability in accordance with their population change rate and super aging which is being deepened recently. Individual factor, environment factor, society integration factor, emotional and psychological factor affect the quality of life in the aspect of strengthening the capacity of the elderly with disability to improve their quality of life and to analyze their satisfaction of life and the quality of life positively.
This study took advantage of survey research method to solve the study subject. I collected data through the structured questionnaire as the object of 426 the elderly with disability who live in retirement residing in 2 cities and 2 counties in Jeollanam-do and executed correlations using SPSS for verification of hypothesis and structure equation model analysis using AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structure) 5.0. 9 latency variables that influence on the quality of life of the elderly with disability through the confirmation of wide documents and the preliminary investigation and the interview with them for this were confirmed, and 49 observation variables that explain disability, economy level, social support, social awareness, physical environment, society activity participation, self-efficacy, daily life ability, quality of life were established. I constructed a total of 20 hypotheses and 11 hypotheses were supported. Therefore the structure model which explain the quality of life of the elderly with disability inclusively could be confirmed.
Summarizing the main results, firstly, it showed that recognized disability had meaningful effect on everyday life ability. When I studied the result of difference analysis by each characteristic, in the case of unmarried status in marriage state, in the case of couple family in the aspect of living together and in the case of high academic background in scholarship, it showed that recognized disability was low. The more discrimination experiences on the disability, and the smaller total income, it showed that the degree of recognized disability was high. In the recognized disability of disability type, cerebral palsy, hearing impairment and language impairment had meaningful difference. The more serious in cerebral palsy and language impairment it showed that the recognized disability was high while in the case of hearing impairment the opposite result appeared.
Secondly, in the case of economy level the connection with the quality of life showed meaningful effect. That is, the higher the economy level was, the higher the quality of life was. When I studied the difference analysis by each characteristic, in the case of senior citizens having sight impairment the degree was more serious, and the economy level of more serious senior citizens was high.
Thirdly, it appeared that social support had meaningful effect on self-efficacy and the quality of life, and in the case of the difference analysis by each characteristic it appeared that social support in the case of dispaupered the elderly with disability, the high academic elderly with disability, the elderly with disability having family living together, the elderly with disability without having discrimination experiences on the disability and the elderly with disability having high income was higher.
Fourthly, it appeared that social recognition had meaningful effect on daily life ability, and it also appeared that discrimination experiences on the disability had close relationship with social recognition. In the factors affecting social recognition in accordance with the cause of disability, industrial disaster was the highest, which is considered to come from the recognition that it is industrial accident happening at industrialization process.
Fifthly, it appeared that physical environment influenced on the quality of life and the daily life ability. As the result of difference analysis by each characteristic, in the case of unmarried status in marriage state, in the case without having disability discrimination experience or in the case having much income, physical environment was good.
Sixthly, it appeared that society activity participation influence on self-efficacy and daily life ability. As the result of difference analysis by each characteristic, it appeared that society activity participation in the case of more young elderly with disability, the elderly with disability participating in religion activity, the high academic background elderly with disability, and the high income elderly with disability was high. In relation with disability period, the society activity participation of the elderly with disability for more than 30 years was high.
Seventhly, self-efficacy is very important variable because it is the belief that they can do something, which is the base of taking part in local community activity and achieving social role, and daily life ability has meaningful relationship with society activity participation and quality of life. In the result of this study it appeared that self-efficacy and daily life ability had meaningful effect on the quality of life and it appeared that self-efficacy was high in the single elderly with disability, the more young elderly with disability, the high income elderly with disability and the high academic background elderly with disability. It appeared that daily life ability was high in the case of the dispaupered elderly with disability, the more young elderly with disability, the high income elderly with disability, the inborn elderly with disability, and the long durable elderly with disability.
Eighthly, it appeared that the quality of life in the case of the religious activity participating elderly with disability, the high academic background elderly with disability, the traffic accident elderly with disability, and the high income elderly with disability was high.
When we see the results, we can confirm that the elderly with disability were weaker in all situations than the normal elderly or other aged disabled persons and specially was in very difficult situation economically. Futhermore it appeared that the elderly with disability had the difference of receiving the same variable in accordance with the type of disability. Therefore there needs the differentiated policy according to the type of disability in the supply of service. In addition to it, there needs the strategy of service focused on society environment change in social welfare practice and the reinforcement of social support service for the elderly with disability. Specially, income guarantee, medical guarantee and social support service for the quality of life of the solitary elderly with disability and governmental support policy for looking after the elderly with disability may have to be prepared for. In addition, when the improvement of physical environment like neighboring living facilities laying stress on neighborhood area that the elderly with disability inhabits and the social recognition become changed, the degree that the elderly with disability participate in society activity can be high and these results may be revealed as the local community unification of the elderly with disability. In order to improve the quality of life of the elderly with disability through these results, the interdisciplinary systematic research on the development of integrated program through co-relation with social welfare field that can offer not only the support for the individual elderly with disability but also the support for the change of environment surrounding the elderly with disability and the emotional and psychological dimension should be prepared for.
Key Words: the elderly with disability, recognized disability, economy level, social support, physical environment, social recognition, society activity participation, self-efficacy, daily life ability, quality of life.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 개인정보 처리 목적, 항목 및 법적 근거 수정 · 본인대상정보전송요구권 행사 방법 안내 · 개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과 추가 |
|
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 수집·이용 근거 | 수집·이용 목적 | 수집·이용 항목 | 보유·이용기간 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [학술연구정보 서비스 이용자 가입정보] |
「개인정보 보호법」 제15조 제1항 제4호(계약 이행) |
회원 서비스 운영 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 보호자 성명(어린이회원), 보호자 이메일(어린이회원) |
회원탈퇴시 까지 |
| 「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한 법률」 제6조 및 같은 법 시행령 제6조 |
주문 및 결제 처리 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 주소 |
5년 |
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)