재범 고위험자에 대한 보호관찰제도 연구 : 형사사법기관의 공조방안을 중심으로 = A Study on Probation and Parole System for the High-Probability of Reoffending Offenders : With Focus on Collaboration of Criminal Justice System
Korea introduced the Probation and Parole System in 1989 and has operated it for 20 years. Despite the shortage of manpower and resources compared to the number of probationer and parolee, the Probation and Parole System has fulfilled its role as the final preventer of reoffending in local communities.
When the Social Protection Act was abolished in 2005, the Protective Watch System, the societal safety network against career criminals, was also abolished. In 2008, Electronic Monitoring System was introduced to supervise specific sex offenders. Along with the Probation and Parole System, it made it possible to protect the society from career sex offenders.
However, some criticized that it is difficult to control the high- probability of reoffending offenders in the society with the Probation and Parole System, which is only a small part of the criminal justice system, and the Probation and Parole authority that lacks human and material resources to execute the system.
Thus, Korea attempted a new approach to prevent the high- probability of reoffending offenders from recidivism. It involved input various tangible and intangible resources, such as authority, manpower, equipment, information, and experience, of the authorities of criminal justice system, including the police, the prosecution, the courts, and the correction.
This strategy is realized in various forms of collaboration, including the probation and parole authority's partnerships with the police, collaboration with the prosecution and the courts, information exchange with the correction, and integration with correction organizations.
In England, many related organizations of the communities, including the police, the courts, the probation and parole authority, and social welfare facilities form a multi-agency collaboration unit such as ‘MAPPA(Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement).’ It has actually been proven that such collaboration of related organizations is highly effective in preventing recidivism in the communities.
The aforementioned changes in the Probation and Parole System reflects the changes in awareness that fighting crime is no longer an issue controlled solely by the police or the probation and parole offices, but it is the responsibility of everyone in the society.
However, it is true that many related authorities, including the police, the prosecution, the courts, the corrections, and probation and parole authority have been rather passive in collaborating with one another to solve the problem of recidivism.
In this regard, this study discussed the collaboration of crime-related authorities as a reasonable solution to the problem of the high- probability of reoffending offenders. Also, it stressed that various crime-related authorities, including the ones mentioned above, should utilize their tangible and intangible resources under all governmental systems and proposed specific measures to do so.
The following summarizes the policies suggested in result of this study:
First, it is very important to collaborate with the police that has a powerful information network and ample manpower and equipment. In particular, it is important to build a system to notify the police immediately when the high-probability of reoffending offenders who registered in the protective monitoring system cannot be located to arrest him/her and prevent recidivism. There must also be a system that supports arrest a probationer or parolee that monitored by the Electronic Monitoring System when he/she violates the rules.
Second, when Collaborating with the prosecution, it is necessary to build a mutually collaborative relationships instead of the current hierarchical relationship between the probation and parole authority and the prosecutions. When a probation and parole officer applies for a warrant or revoke the probation or parole, there should be a more active communication between the organizations than now. Also, if a suspect is a reoffender, the prosecutors should refer to the database provided by the police, the probation and parole authority, and the correction authority to predict the possibility of reoffending and reflect it to his/her sentence.
Third, when collaborating with the courts, there should be a system through which criminals with psychological abnormalities can be identified and diagnosed in the early stage of trials. It should also be reflected in the process of correction and probation and parole. The presentence investigation system should be revitalized and information exchanges with the probation and parole authority should be strengthened.
Fourth, as for the relationships with the corrections, such as jails and confinement facilities, the probation and parole authority should be able to share various data on convicts' psychological information and correction programs. A close collaborative network is necessary between the probation and parole authority and the correction authority. In the long-term, the probation and parole organization and the correction organization should be integrated to control criminals more effectively.
What is most important is that the society should not think that the reoffending issue is a responsibility of a certain crime-related authority. The government should provide a common goal for all crime-related organizations, including the police, the prosecution, the courts, the corrections, and the probation and parole authority to pursue the mission of preventing reoffending in cooperation.
Also, it is worth considering the establishment of an official commission between crime-related organizations, as we can see in the case of England's MAPPA(Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement). Furthermore, the government's interests and cooperation are required to register and manage information about reoffenders in the Criminal Justice Information Integrated System, which is one of the long-term goals of the Ministry of Justice.
Last, future studies on the collaboration between the probation and parole authority and other crime-related organizations should include more substantial and in-depth discussions on the influence of their collaboration on the rate of recidivism in the communities and on the public safety.
Furthermore, I hope that many studies are performed in this field to accumulate empirical information on reducing the recidivism rate and contribute to establishing more effective policies in the Korean society.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 개인정보 처리 목적, 항목 및 법적 근거 수정 · 본인대상정보전송요구권 행사 방법 안내 · 개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과 추가 |
|
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 수집·이용 근거 | 수집·이용 목적 | 수집·이용 항목 | 보유·이용기간 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [학술연구정보 서비스 이용자 가입정보] |
「개인정보 보호법」 제15조 제1항 제4호(계약 이행) |
회원 서비스 운영 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 보호자 성명(어린이회원), 보호자 이메일(어린이회원) |
회원탈퇴시 까지 |
| 「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한 법률」 제6조 및 같은 법 시행령 제6조 |
주문 및 결제 처리 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 주소 |
5년 |
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)