관광지 재생 지표 개발에 관한 연구 : 도시 관광지 재생을 중심으로
저자
발행사항
서울 : 경희대학교 대학원, 2014
학위논문사항
발행연도
2014
작성언어
한국어
주제어
DDC
647.9 판사항(22)
발행국(도시)
서울
기타서명
A Study on Developing Indicators of Tourism Destination Regeneration : Focused on the Regeneration of Urban Tourism Destination
형태사항
ⅷ, 166 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
일반주기명
지도교수: 이충기
경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
참고문헌: p. 116-122
소장기관
This study aims at development of planning indicators that can be used when establishing tourist attraction regeneration plan in the future, through case analysis of indicator development in establishing concept and planning for developing indicators of tourism destination regeneration. To attain research purpose effectively, I set up detailed goals as follows: first, I define concept of tourism destination regeneration through theoretical investigation by literature search; second, I draw up properties of tourism destination regeneration through precedent research and analysis of domestic and foreign case research; third, I find out the importance of preliminary properties of tourism destination regeneration drawn up, through delphi survey targeting experts; fourth, I compute weightings and order of priority through AHP analysis of tourism destination regeneration indicators drawn up through delphi survey and use them for the efficient decision-making when regenerating tourism destination.
At first, as for the range of time, I determined the year 2013 as the research target year and conducted research for a year, and during this period I gathered opinions and carried out survey through literature research and selection of experts, and then I did an empirical analysis of the results statistically. Next, as for the range of space, considering classification of tourist attraction is very various, I restricted it to the urban tourism destination.
As for the research methods, I conducted an empirical analysis of computing the importance(weighting) of properties selected through AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and expert survey using delphi technique as the research method for development of indicators and theoretical research through precedent research and domestic and foreign case research.
As for research process, I utilized evaluation indicator of urban regeneration targeting tourism destination declined by many factors, development of indicators targeting historical and cultural tourism destination, and leading indicators of tourism destination remodeling, and drew up tourism destination regeneration indicators.
In the first stage, to draw up superordinate concept, I reviewed evaluation elements of the urban regeneration through research of domestic and foreign relevant literature and carried out a comparative analysis between concepts related to tourism destination regeneration and conceptualization of indicators. In the second stage, for drawing up properties by sector, I classified into and investigated the physical/environmental aspect, economic aspect, social/cultural aspect, and policy/institutional aspect, considered similar concepts to remodeling elements relevant to tourism together, and integrated the overlapped evaluation elements. In the third stage, I conducted a survey targeting experts of drawn properties, and collected opinions on preliminary properties. In the fourth stage, I drew up the importance and the order of priority of tourism destination regeneration indicators drawn up through the prior process through AHP analysis.
As for the object of data collection for research, I conducted delphi and AHP analyses over 3 rounds targeting 20 persons, including experts (academic circle, public and private enterprises) and researchers belonging to the relevant research institutes by sector, such as tourism/culture, urban development, ecological/environmental landscaping, and community development.
After delphi analysis, I eliminated 26 of 73 properties, and the eliminated properties were those judged to be relatively very low compared with family variables on the basis of average value and CVR value. As the result, a total of 47 properties were drawn up and I applied them to the third AHP research.
As the result of AHP, in the relative weighting and the order of priority on the superordinate concept of the tourist attraction regeneration properties, economic property accounted for 30.33% of the whole, which showed to be considered most importantly.
It was found in order that physical/environmental property was 27.28%, social/cultural property was 25.65%, and institutional/policy property was 16.74%, which indicated to have relatively high importance. The consistency ratio(CR) was found to be 0.026, which expressed to have high consistency.
As for the relative weighting and the order of priority of subordinate concepts by category of tourism destination regeneration properties, the most important one among subordinate concepts of physical/environmental properties was tourism resource management, which was found to account for 27.31% of the whole.
The most important item of subordinate concepts of social/cultural properties was vitalization of cultural industry, which was found to occupy 49.5% of the whole.
The most important property among subordinate concepts of economic properties was creation of tourism revenue, which was found to comprise 45.14% of the whole.
Lastly, the most important item among subordinate concepts of institutional/policy properties was participation in social development, which was found to take up 25.51% of the whole.
As for the whole superordinate concepts of tourist attraction regeneration properties and the order of priority for the importance by expert group, if the whole average of the relative weighting by group of superordinate concepts became standard, the economic property was found to be the most important factor to be considered, followed by physical/environmental, social/cultural, and institutional/policy properties.
In the comparison by group, it showed that professor and development business groups considered economic property most importantly; researcher considered physical/environmental property most importantly; and civil servant considered social/cultural property most importantly.
The academic suggestion of this study is to propose necessity of tourism destination regeneration due to decay of tourist attraction through theoretical background through precedent research and to select indicators for regenerating tourism destination. Although the basic plan for tourism destination regeneration is not established, indicators of this study seem to be of help to the more systematic selection in the policy decision-making. Discussion about various problems and outcomes will be possible by directly applying these selected indicators to the target area decayed as the tourism destination.
Lastly, the limitation of this study is that sample of research subjects is very restricted, as the analysis methods are delphi research and AHP analysis, so the future research direction should be development of decline indicator and development of regeneration indicator for the individual tourism destination considering type of tourism destination. Also, it will be necessary to directly apply developed indicators to the field and grasp its problems and results.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 수탁업체 콘소시엄 기관명 및 위탁기간 명시 | · 제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁) 구체화 |
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 |
보유기간 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 | 한국교육학술정보원법 정보추제 동의 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
| 선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 | |||
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)