한국어 학습자의 말하기 효능감 연구 = A Study on Speaking Efficacy of Korean learners
저자
발행사항
부산 : 부산대학교 대학원, 2017
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사) -- 부산대학교 대학원 , 외국어로서의한국어교육전공 , 2017. 8
발행연도
2017
작성언어
한국어
주제어
DDC
411.07 판사항(23)
발행국(도시)
부산
형태사항
viii, 246 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
일반주기명
지도교수: 전은주
부록: 1. 말하기 효능감 설문지(중국어 번역), 2. 말하기 효능감 설문지(일본어 번역), 3. 말하기 효능감 설문지(영어 번역) 외 수록
참고문헌: p. 207-215
DOI식별코드
소장기관
The present study aims to analyze speaking efficacy based on variables of KFL learners and the correlation between class preference and speaking efficacy. Additionally, it aims to identify implications for speaking instruction. A speaking efficacy scale was developed and the constructs of speaking efficacy were examined.
This paper defines speaking efficacy as the belief in the ability of one’s own speaking competence. A speaking efficacy scale was developed based on the constructs of Korean speaking ability, goals to be achieved in speaking education, and discourse types taught in Korean language education.
Four hundred and seventy Korean language learners were selected from three university Korean language education centers. Learners’ responses were analyzed. The factors affecting speaking efficacy had a 70.017% variance and consisted of the following six determinants: 1. Speaking performance efficacy factor (21.256 %); 2. Word, grammar, discourse efficacy factor (13.816 %); 3. Fundamental speaking efficacy factor (9. 956 %); 4. Cognition efficacy factor (9.758%); 5. Politeness efficacy factor(8.662 %); and 6. Pronunciation efficacy factor (7.447%).
KFL learner's speaking efficacy based on variables of speaking efficacy were also examined. The study revealed that, with a statistical significance level of 0.05, there were no significant differences in the factors of speaking efficacy based on age, educational background, or purpose of studying Korean.
Pronunciation efficacy of males was higher than that of females with a statistical significance level, and statistics of pronunciation efficacy was significantly higher in males.
Regarding speaking efficacy based on the length of residence in Korea, there were meaningful differences with the statistical significance level. Speaking efficacy of the learners who had lived in Korea for 1 year to 1 year and 6 months was higher than the learners who had stayed in Korea less than 6 months and those who had stayed 1 year and 6 months to 2 years. This is probably because the Korean language program can be completed in 1 year and 6 months, provided that no classes are failed or repeated.
Speaking efficacy showed a high correlation with the learner's language group and proficiency. However, in the case of speaking efficacy based on TOPIK score, there was a meaningful difference only in the fundamental speaking efficacy and the speaking performance efficacy. This is because the current TOPIK exam does not evaluate speaking.
When considering Korean speaking efficacy based on the native language, there were meaningful differences in all factors of speaking efficacy. Chinese- and English-speaking learners’ speaking efficacy was significantly higher than that of the Japanese-speaking learners and the Southeast Asian language speaking-learners. Japanese-speaking learners’ speaking efficacy in particular was significantly lower than that of other language-speaking learners. These results seem to be due to the tendency in Japanese culture not to reveal self-confidence.
Chinese-speaking learners estimate their own speaking ability to be high. Chinese-speaking learners have high efficacy and preference for discussion compared with learners in other language groups. Chinese-speaking learners’ preference for role play was higher than that of learners of other language groups. Furthermore, Chinese-speaking learners prefer classes in which they can receive substantial feedback on speaking in a casual atmosphere.
Japanese-speaking learners generally showed low speaking efficacy in pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, discourse, and politeness norms. This is probably because they exhibit stronger fear of failure to produce imperfect speech compared to learners of other language groups.
Among Japanese-speaking learners, projects were strongly preferred by students with high speaking efficacy, but not by those with low speaking efficacy. Therefore, this study suggests that teachers help students with low speaking efficacy to participate actively in class activities and to participate as part of the class team.
English speaking learners showed the next-highest speaking efficacy. In particular, they showed the highest level in cognition efficacy and in using varied vocabulary. The low-speaking efficacy group showed an especially low preference for discussion compared to other speaking activities. Therefore, it is suggested that when conducting discussion classes with English-speaking learners, it is necessary to design lessons elaborately so that low-efficacy speakers can participate actively. The low-speaking efficacy group’s preference for classes with a passionate teacher was statistically higher than that of the high-speaking efficacy group with the statistical significance level.
The speaking efficacy of Southeast Asian learners was significantly lower than that of both Chinese- and English-speaking learners. Low speaking efficacy means that the Southeast Asian learners were not confident in their ability to speak and communicate in Korean. As low speaking efficacy can lead to low will to engage in communication, it is suggested that teachers encourage Southeast Asian learners to participate actively in speaking activities. Compared to learners in other language groups, Southeast Asian learners show a stronger preference for small group speaking activities.
There were meaningful differences in all factors of speaking efficacy based on Korean language proficiency level. Overall speaking efficacy tended to increase as proficiency got higher. However, level 3 and level 6 showed lower or unimproved speaking proficiency. This study proposes that the following points be taken into account in order to teach Korean speaking effectively.
First, the speaking efficacy of level 1 learners was significantly lower than the other level learners. Level 1 leaners with high speaking efficacy preferred role-play more so than did learners with low speaking efficacy. Therefore, it would be effective to implement role play for high-speaking efficacy learners.
Secondly, there was no difference between the speaking efficacy of level 2 learners and level 3 learners. Even though Korean language proficiency increased, speaking efficacy did not improve substantially. The results also prove that willingness of the level 3 learners to communicate could be lower. Level 3 learners with low speaking efficacy did not prefer presentations or project tasks. Additionally, they did not prefer to receive the teacher’s feedback on their speaking and they did not want to correct their errors immediately.
Thirdly, there were no differences between the speaking efficacy of level 5 and level 6 learners. Furthermore, the speaking efficacy of level 6 learners was lower than that of the level 5 leaners in debate performances and in handling Korean at official work. It is suggested that teachers should help students to experience successful debate performances and also in handling Korean at official work. And teachers should encourage learners to believe in their own speaking abilities.
The significance of this paper is summarized as follows.
First of all, this paper developed the first speaking efficacy scale for Korean language education and tested its validity. The speaking efficacy scale presented here can be used as a reference material for class design, and the effectiveness of educational programs can be verified by measuring speaking efficacy before and after instruction. Secondly, this paper established constructed elements of speaking efficacy. Information on Korean learners' speaking efficacy was provided. Thirdly, the factors that affect speaking efficacy were revealed. Finally, suggestions for instruction according to language group and proficiency were outlined. These can be used as a basic reference for the design of teacher education and education courses.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 수탁업체 콘소시엄 기관명 및 위탁기간 명시 | · 제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁) 구체화 |
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 |
보유기간 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 | 한국교육학술정보원법 정보추제 동의 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
| 선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 | |||
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)