ARCS전략을 적용한 구성주의적 수업이 과학개념 획득과 동기유발에 미치는 효과 = (The) effects of the constructivist instructional model using ARCS strategies on the acquisition of scientific conceptions and learning motivation
저자
발행사항
부산 : 부산대학교 대학원, 1998
학위논문사항
발행연도
1998
작성언어
한국어
주제어
KDC
370.18 판사항(4)
발행국(도시)
부산
형태사항
iv, 202p. ; 26cm.
DOI식별코드
소장기관
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of the constructivist instructional model using ARCS(attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction) strategies on the acquisition of scientific conceptions and learning motivation. The specific questions set up for the study were as follows:
1. Which of these instructional models, the teacher-centered instructional models, the constructivist instructional model, and the constructivist instructional model using ARCS strategies, has the most effective results on the acquistion of scientific conceptions and academic achievement?
2. Which of these three instructional models has the most effective results on learning motivation?
3. According to the level of inquiry abilities, which of these three instructional models has the most effective results on the acquisition of scientific conceptions, academic achievement and learning motivation?
4. Which of these three instructional models has the effective result on retention of scientific conceptions and academic achievement?
The subjects of this study were 240 students sampled from 2nd graders of a middle school in Pusan. The first experimental group(experimental group I) consisted of two classes of students who participated in the traditional teaching program. The second experimental group(experimental group Ⅱ) consisted of two classes of students who participated in the constructivist teaching program(prediction-explanations-observation-discussion-application). The third experimental group(experimental group Ⅲ) consisted of two classes of students who participated in the constructivist teaching program using ARCS strategies.
It took 3 weeks for this experiment. All experimental groups were taught about atmospheric weight, directions of atmospheric pressure, relations of atmospheric pressure and temperature an air convections.
To examine students' pre-conceptions before the instructions, a pre-conceptions test was administered. After the instructions, students' acquisition of scientific conceptions, academic achievement, and learning motivation were measured with a researcher-made post-conceptions test, achievement test and The Course Interest Survey.
The quantitative data analysis consisted of a one way variance. The quantitative data analysis consisted of a 3(instructional models)×2(inquiry abilities levels: high and low) ANOVA on scores of scientific conceptions, academic achievement, learning motivation in crossed and nested designs.
The qualitative data analysis consisted of the rate of misconceptions about atmospheric weight, directions of atmospheric pressure, relations of atmospheric pressure and temperature and air convection.
The results from this study were as follows:
First, the scores of scientific conceptions of students of experimental groupⅡ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅠ. The scores of scientific conceptions of students of experimental group Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅡ.
The academic achievement of students of experimental groupⅡ and experimental group Ⅲ were significantly higher than that of students of experimental groupⅠ. There were no significant differences in academic achievement between students of experimental groupⅡ and students of experimental group Ⅲ.
Second, the scores of learning motivation of students of experimental groupⅡ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅠ. The scores of learning motivation of students of experimental group Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental group Ⅱ.
Third, the scores of learning motivation conceptions and academic achievement of students of high inquiry abilities levels of experimental groupⅡ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅠ. There are no significant differences in the scores of scientific conceptions and academic achievement between students of high inquiry abilities level of experimental group Ⅱ and students of experimental group Ⅲ.
The scores of science conceptions and academic achievement of the students of low inquiry abilities level of experimental group Ⅲ were higher than those of students of experimental group I only.
The scores of learning motivation of students of high inquiry abilities level of experimental group Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅠ. There are no significant differences in the learning motivation between students of high inquiry abilities level of experimental group Ⅱ and students of experimental group Ⅲ. The scores of learning motivation of students of low inquiry abilities level of experimental groupⅡ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental group Ⅰ, and the scores of learning motivation of students of low inquiry abilities level of experimental group Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of students of experimental groupⅡ.
Fourth, retention of scientific conceptions of students of experimental group Ⅱ and Ⅲ were higher than those of students of experimental groupⅠ. There were no significant differences in the retention of scientific conceptions between students of experimental groupⅡ and Ⅲ. Retention of academic achievement of students of experimental group Ⅲ were higher than those of students of experimental group I only.
The above results therefore implied that; First, the constructivist instructional model using ARCS strategies is more effective method in acquisition of scientific conceptions, academic achievement and learning motivation than the other two methods. Therefore, in order to increase the acquisition of scientific conceptions and to decrease the scientific misconceptions, we need to use the constructivist instructional model and motivation strategies which make learners self check their own preconceptions of science.
Second, the constructivist instructional model using ARCS strategies is more effective than the teacher-centered instructional model or the constructivist instructional model in learning motivation. Furthermore, the constructivist instructional model in more effective than teacher-centered model in four elements of learning motivation. So, we need to develop the effective ARCS strategies in order to use the constuctivist instructional model and to verify it's effectiveness.
Third, as the constructivist instructional model is effective in the acquisition of scientific conceptions to the learners who are high in the inquiry abilities, so it is required we develop various constructivist instructional strategies. On the other hand, as the learners who are low in the inquiry abilities are effective in the acquisition of scientific conceptions, when learning motivation strategies are applied to the constructivist instructional model, so it is required to develop learning strategy which can be applied to the constructivist instructional model.
Fourth, to improve teaching and learning methods, education researchers should carry out studies using many points of view than studies biased constructivism or objectivism. In this respect, we need to contrive how to integrate constructive view points and objective view points.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 개인정보 처리 목적, 항목 및 법적 근거 수정 · 본인대상정보전송요구권 행사 방법 안내 · 개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과 추가 |
|
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 수집·이용 근거 | 수집·이용 목적 | 수집·이용 항목 | 보유·이용기간 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [학술연구정보 서비스 이용자 가입정보] |
「개인정보 보호법」 제15조 제1항 제4호(계약 이행) |
회원 서비스 운영 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 보호자 성명(어린이회원), 보호자 이메일(어린이회원) |
회원탈퇴시 까지 |
| 「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한 법률」 제6조 및 같은 법 시행령 제6조 |
주문 및 결제 처리 |
ID, 비밀번호, 이름, 주소 |
5년 |
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 보호수준 평가 결과)
제16조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)