沙溪 金長生과 愼獨齋 金集의 禮學思想 硏究
저자
발행사항
대전: 忠南大學校 大學院, 1990
학위논문사항
발행연도
1990
작성언어
한국어
DDC
181.119 판사항(22)
발행국(도시)
대전
기타서명
(A) study on the thought of propriety of Sagye Kim, Jang-saeng and Sindogjae Kim, Jip
형태사항
242, 24, 7, 5, 5 p.; 26cm.
일반주기명
지도교수: 최근묵
참고문헌 수록
소장기관
This paper aims to examine the thought of properiety of Kim, Jang-Saeng and Kim, Jip in the 17th C, Choson Dynasty.
So far, the studies on their proprieties has produced only s few dissertations. In my opinion, the problems in those studies can be summarized into the following three points. First and foremost, they focuced only on the philosophical aspects. Therefore they missed the essential points of the historical development of Choson Dynasty propriety. Second, they did not conduct a thorough enough investigation on the background of propriety studies in Choson Dynasty. Third, they lacked the specific analysis of the other propriety books and the comparative study on the other propriety schools. Naturally, they cannot be said to illuminate satisfactorily the related propriety studies.
This paper will compensate those shortcomings and summarize the burgeoning backdrop of the contemporary propriety studies. It will examine the objective characteristics and historical aspects of the propriety study of Kim, Jang-Saeng and Kim, Jip.
We can find justification and objectiveness in the study of their proprieties in two aspects. One is that they are the immediate descendents of the distinguished confucianists, such as Confucius, MingTzu, ChuTzu, Yul-Kok(栗谷) They therefore are loyal to the precedent legitimate confucianism. The other is that they led the early 17th C mainstream as well as nonmainstream confucianists under the banner of "Reconstruction of the confucian order."
Next, the characteristic thoughts of KIM,jang-saeng and KIM,jip’s prpperity and its meaning in the historical aspects can be enumerated as follows ;
First, their properity put emphasis on the strict individual en lightenment in the sense of moral uplifting. Kim,Jang-saeng cited Ko Gyong (居敬:holy human humility to understand the heavenly "Ways")to practice the logical thesis of self-uplifting human enlightenment and he understood that the attainment of the Heaven s Right eousness through Ko Gyong is the best way to grasp the salient teachings of old sages. His properity, preferred on the personal moral culture, went harmonious with the basic principles of Confucianism which paid high esteem to "individual moral cultivation" towards political human development. As well, this personal moral cultivation could lead to the socialization of his propriety which resulted in his propriety thought of "From oneself toward humanity".
Kim,Jip’s propriety thought followed the faithful road of Kim, jang-saeng s propriety thought. The Former defined propriety as the way of "Control human desires to preserve the heavenly ways", which reflected the latter s thought of "The Heavenly Righteousness can be attainable by way of Ko Gyong". The gist of his propriety can be said in a word of Kyong(敬). His alias of Sin Dok(愼獨) and his mannerly behavior, based on his own theory of propriety, strict enough to be a prototype of his successors, could be understood as a guidepost toward his proprity thought. Song,Jun-gil, his disciple, expressed his spirit and behabior as "Kim,jip lived for and died in propriety".
Second, their propriety centerd on Karye (家禮) of "coming of age, Marriage, Burial, Ansestrial worship", especially the manners relevant to the burial ceremonies. ChuTzu had not rectified some aspects of the burial ceremomoy which had functioned is the backbone of filial piety in the old Korean society. To revitalize the declining morallity, he felt it was urgent to restore the downfall en proper manners.
Especially The propriety on the burial ceremony was considered as a backbone to establish and preserve good customs and filial piety. The regulations concerning mourning attires, an essence of burial ceremony, was required to practice the discipline of a clan and revitalize the downfallen ethical orders.
Third, Their properity, centered on the revitalization of legit imacy, showed the typical features of "clan legitimacy through propriety". Kim, Jang-saeng understood the function of propriety as to order legitimacy. His viewpoints were well observed in his books and speeches on propriety. It must be noted that he was adamant to his principles of legitimacy even in the theoretical dispute with King In Jo on the royal manners.
Fourth, Their proprity worshiped ChutzuGaRye (朱子家禮) and Korye(古禮) but in the critical eye. They believed in the critical acceptance of the traditional proprity thoughts only by way of absolute theoretical basis and propprity spirit standing on human of fection. Kim,Jang-saeng said on the relationship between KoRye and institutional mores native to ChoSon, "Follow the human proprity without KoRye". He took side on the proprity based on the humanity when conflict occured between two.
Kim, Jip’s proprity also followed his father s thought. Talking on the institutions of propriety, he emphasized "Propriety should stand on humanity and timeliness".
Fifth, their propriety devoted itself to the pragmatic and en- lightening aspects to be socially beneficial to many people. Karyejipram(家禮輯覽) is an illustrated scholaly etiquettebook compiled of all the domestic and overseas versions of manners. Two specifically illustrated prefaces are aimed at the promotion of pragmatic applicability of the theoretical etiquettes. Uiryemunhae(疑禮問解) and its sequel(疑禮問解續) compiled the problematic practices in the real life, written in catechetic formats. Sangryebiyo(喪禮備要) was the most popular textbook of the noblemen in Choson Dynasty.
Sixth, their philosophy of propriety came to light in the form of the first professional academic book in Korea. Its contents elaborated ChuTzu’s philosophy and compiled all family propriety of the Choson Dynasty. This fact indicates that his theoretical scholarly study provided fullfledged authoritative Choson Dynasty principles of etiquettes. The etiquettes were independent from the dominent Chinese influences.
Seventh, their theories served as a cornerstone of the logical outlook of Hoso Propriety school(湖西禮學派). Kim,Jang-saeng used to give the first piority to the Sohak and Karye when he taught his disciples to diffuse his philosophy even to the general public.
His catachismic teaching contibuted to the foundation of his own school. His disciples reached up to 200 eminent scholars, of whom Kim,Jip. Song,Si-Yol(宋時烈). Song,Jun- Gil(宋浚吉) Yi, Yu-Tae(李惟泰) and others could be cited as founding fathers of Hoso propriety school.
Kim,Jip's doctrine was the theoretical spine of the Hoso school which originated from his father s family etiquette enligtenment and his teaching methology. Kim Jip strove to develop the established theories into the academic basis of the famed Hoso Propriety School. After the death of his father, he was spotlighted as an orthodox successor to the dominent ethical studies, Under the con- temporary academic trends, 27 notable scholars, especially 5 sages in Chungchongdo gathered under his teaching. Their academic bondage grew stronger when he was appointed as the Minister of Interior.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 수탁업체 콘소시엄 기관명 및 위탁기간 명시 | · 제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁) 구체화 |
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 |
보유기간 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 | 한국교육학술정보원법 정보추제 동의 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
| 선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 | |||
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)