KCI등재
과잉방위 규정의 역사적 발전과정 = Historical Development Process of the Provisions on Excessive Self-Defense
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2023
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
91-137(47쪽)
제공처
소장기관
In view of the fact that excessive self-defense claim is rarely accepted in practice, the legislative background was evaluated to determine whether it would be reasonable to have various types of excessive self-defense prescribed in Article 21 of Criminal Code. To this end, the development process of excessive self-defense in German Criminal Code and Japanese Penal Code, the model forms of Korean Criminal Code, was examined. This would also be an attempt to account for why provisions on excessive self-defense should exist.
In Germany, self-defense and excessive self-defense first appeared in the Bamberg Criminal Code in 1507 and developed according to the social setting. Excessive self-defense was stipulated to be applied complementarily to cases in which the requirements for self-defense were not met. In the development process of excessive self-defense, the range of excessive self-defense varied depending on the strictness of self-defense requirement. Whereas the range of excessive self-defense was relatively wide when the requirements for self-defense were rigorous, the range was comparatively restricted when the requirements for self-defense were eased.
Self-defense was stipulated in Japan in 1880, but excessive self-defense only appeared in 1907. Compared to the 1871 German Imperial Criminal Code, the example of the enactment of the Japanese Penal Code in 1907, the provisions of self-defense at the time were very similar to each other. However, excessive self-defense in Japanese Penal Code was abstractly defined as its effect was widely prescribed in that the punishment was discretionarily exempted or mitigated. In light of the development history of self-defense and excessive self-defense provisions in Germany, the scope of excessive self-defense in Japan was presumed to be widely defined. On the contrary, self-defense provision of the Japanese Penal Code was interpreted as a strict standard, resulting in a balance of self-defense and excessive self-defense.
In South Korea, the government draft at the time of enactment only stipulated excessive self-defense for a mitigated punishment, such as the old law (Japanese Penal Code), but the amendment proposed by the National Assembly Legislation and Judiciary Committee revised the requisite for self-defense from ‘necessity standard’ to ‘considerableness standard,’ while adding unpunishable excessive self-defense in addition to the existing excessive self-defense for a reduced punishment. The amendment of the Legislation and Judiciary Committee was similar to the 1925 German Criminal Code Amendment and the 1940 Japanese Penal Code Amendment. The 1925 German Criminal Code Amendment, also an example of the 1940 Japanese Penal Code Amendment, emerged for a legislative improvement in the 19th century when the requirements for self-defense were eased according to the liberal trends. The 1925 German Criminal Code Amendment changed the requirement of self-defense to ‘considerableness standard’ that could be interpreted more restrictively than the existing ‘necessity standard’ while stipulating various types of excessive self-defense so that excessive self-defense could be widely used.
After examining the development process, it was verified that the current legislative form - Paragraph 1 of Article 21 stipulates the self-defense requisite as the ‘considerableness standard’ that can be strictly interpreted and applied while Paragraph 1 and 2 of Article 21 stipulate excessive self-defense to be widely applied - is in accord with the essence of excessive self-defense. Since the various types of excessive self-defense stipulated in the Criminal Code seem reasonable from a legislative view, the fact that excessive self-defense claim has been rarely accepted in practice would be virtually an issue of interpretation and application.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)