일본의 회사갱생절차 진행 기업 노동자의 해고요건

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The number of companies in corporate rehabilitation proceedings due to economic depression has been increasing, and the controversial issues of whether those companies can layoff employees in the midst of rehabilitation proceedings arisen, but standard rules on that issue hasn’t been organized yet. This issue, like in Korea, has not been settled in Japan either. Recently the case of JAL’s laying off its employees during the reorganization proceedings that will influence similar court case in Korean.
Accordingly, the objective of this research is to help interpret the law of Korea by studying the court’s ruling and interpretations of conditions of company’s laying off in reorganizing proceedings. Followings are: first, reviewing the features of laying off in terms of Corporate Reorganization Act in Japan, second, reviewing the theories and legal precedents, lastly reviewing what suggestions we can get from those studies.
First, although the regulations regarding laying off has been stipulated in Civil Law, not in Labor Law, they established “the theory of abuse of rights.” nullifying the legal force in Civil Law. Later, it influenced the Labor Standard Act in 2003 when it was amended, and became stipulated in the Labor Contract Act when it enacted in 2007. Second, the problem arises regarding what law can be applied when the company in reorganizing proceedings has to layoff employees; Labor Contract Act or regulations in Corporate Reorganization Act. Some support the former while majority support the latter.
Third, in case that we take layoff theory based on Labor Contract Act, the problem also arises whether we should take the same measures as normal corporate or take flexible measures. The general consensus on this issue is taking the latter.
Fourth, in Japan, the companies in reorganizing proceedings make every effort to avoid redundancy dismissal; a personnel reshuffle, transferring to affiliates, voluntary retirement, pay cut, suspending pay bonus, pay cut for executives, decrease the number of executive officers etc. In recent, supporting reemployment for laid-off workers are being considered seriously.
Fifth, there are controversies over the standard of designating the workers who are to be laid off; age and disease.
Lastly, proceedings of agreement with labor union is considered seriously. General theory is that it requires serious effort for the proceedings of agreement with labor union, but for reorganizing proceedings, some argue that they should take flexible measures.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
• Ⅱ. 회사갱생절차상 해고의 특성
• Ⅲ. 회사갱절차상 해고의 요건
• Ⅳ. 사견 및 시사점
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 片岡昇, "勞動法(2)" 有斐閣 2009
• 2 吾妻光俊, "勞動法" 有斐閣 1966
• 3 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀(上)" 法曹會 1987
• 4 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀(6)" 法曹會 1985
• 5 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀" 法曹會 2001
• 6 淸正寬, "勞働法" 有斐閣 2002
• 7 菅野和夫, "勞働法" 弘文堂 2002
• 8 淺井淸信, "勞働契約槪念を規定するもの" 日本勞働法學會 (42) : 1973
• 9 下井隆史, "勞働基準法" 有斐閣 2007
• 10 박승두, "회생절차 진행기업 노동자의 해고요건" 한국노동법학회 (29) : 131-167, 2009
• 11 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상)(하)" 박영사 2013
• 12 박승두, "회사정리절차의 한ㆍ일 비교 연구" (552) : 2001
• 13 서경환, "회사정리절차가 계약관계에 미치는 영향, In 회사정리법ㆍ화의법상의 제문제" 86 : 2000
• 14 서울지방법원, "회사정리실무" 서울지방법원 2001
• 15 임채홍, "회사정리법(상)(하)" 한국사법행정학회 2002
• 16 박승두, "회사정리법" 법률SOS 2000
• 17 박승두, "해고제도의 일원화론" 한국노동법학회 (30) : 33-66, 2009
• 18 박승두, "파산절차 진행기업 노동자의 해고요건" 한국사회법학회 (11) : 2008
• 19 박승두, "통합도산법분석" 법률SOS 2005
• 20 박승두, "통합도산법" 법문사 2006
• 21 박승두, "채무자회생법과 노동법의 관계" 한국노동법학회 (35) : 193-229, 2010
• 22 박승두, "일본 회사갱생법의 기본구조 및 최근 개정내용에 관한 연구" 한국산업은행 (575) : 2003
• 23 박승두, "일본 민사재생법의 이념과 기본구조" 청주대학교 법학연구소 32 (32): 2010
• 24 김영주, "도산절차상 미이행 쌍무계약에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2013
• 25 박승두, "도산법총론" 법률SOS 2002
• 26 박승두, "기업회생절차의 진행단계별 쟁점에 관한 연구" 한국경영법률학회 22 (22): 175-215, 2011
• 27 朴承斗, "韓國における倒産企業勞働者の賃金請求權に關する硏究" 日本比較法硏究所 37 (37): 2003
• 28 박승두, "韓國における倒産企業勞働者の賃金請求權に關する硏究" 日本比較法硏究所 37 (37): 2003
• 29 吉野正三郞, "集中講義 破産法" 成文堂 1996
• 30 服部 明人, "詳說倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 31 德住 堅治, "詳說倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 32 ｢倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 33 森 倫洋, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 34 松村 卓治, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 35 池田 悠, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 36 荒木 尙志, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013
• 37 齊藤秀夫, "註解破産法(上)(下)" 靑林書院 1999
• 38 川口美貴, "解雇法理の展開(下)/經營上の理由による解雇-山田紡績事件における判斷法理の意義と課題" 勞働開發硏究會 (217) : 2007
• 39 宗田親彦, "破産法槪說" 慶應義塾大學出版會 2001
• 40 渡邊鋼吉, "破産法學" 成文堂 1999
• 41 宮川知法, "破産法" 信山社 1999
• 42 吉野正二郞, "破産法" 成文堂 1996
• 43 林屋禮二, "破産法" 靑林書院 1993
• 44 加藤哲夫, "破産法" 弘文堂 2006
• 45 伊藤眞, "破産法" 有斐閣 2002
• 46 林屋禮二, "破産法" 靑林書院 1993
• 47 高木新二郞, "破産ㆍ和議の基礎知識" 靑林書院 1998
• 48 森 倫洋, "田原睦夫先生古稀ㆍ最高裁判事退官記念論文集:現代民事法の實務と理論(下)" 金融財政事情硏究會 2013
• 49 角田邦重, "現代雇用法" 法律文化社 2007
• 50 船尾 徹, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 更生計劃と整理解雇の有效性判斷との關係についての基本的檢討" 旬報社 (1802) : 1802
• 51 根本 到, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 會社更生手續下の整理解雇の有效性判斷-東京高等裁判所宛意見書" 旬報社 (1802) : 1802
• 52 淸水 直, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 會社更生手續における人員整理のあり方-東京高等裁判所宛意見書" 旬報社 (1802) : 1802
• 53 東京大學勞働法硏究會, "注釋勞働基準法 (上)" 有斐閣 2003
• 54 麻上正信, "注解和議法" 靑林書院 1993
• 55 宮脇幸彦, "注解 會社更生法" 靑林書院 1986
• 56 ｢倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, "槪說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2012
• 57 兼子一監修, "條解會社更生法(中)" 弘文堂 1999
• 58 兼子一監修, "條解會社更生法(下)" 弘文堂 1998
• 59 兼子一監修, "條解會社更生法(上)(中)(下)" 弘文堂 2001
• 60 兼子一監修, "條解會社更生法(上)" 弘文堂 1998
• 61 小屋敏一, "會社更生法 (上)(中Ⅰ)(中Ⅱ)(下)" 中央大學出版部 1978
• 62 伊藤眞, "會社更生法" 有斐閣 2012
• 63 松田二郞, "會社更生法" 有斐閣 1997
• 64 森井利和, "會社倒産と勞働賃金債權確保の實務(1)~(6)" (782~791) : 2000
• 65 戶谷義治, "會社倒産と解雇" 總合勞働硏究所 (224) : 2009
• 66 松本哲泓, "新裁判實務大系(16):勞働關係訴訟法(1)" 靑林書院 2001
• 67 角田邦重, "新現代勞働法入門" 法律文化社 2006
• 68 中町誠, "整理解雇法理は實務上確立しているか" 總合勞働硏究所 (196) : 2001
• 69 鵜飼良昭, "整理解雇法理の現狀と實務上の課題" 總合勞働硏究所 (196) : 2001
• 70 竹下守夫, "大コンメンタ-ル破産法" 靑林書院 2008
• 71 木村雅彦, "基礎講義 破産法" 靑林書院 1998
• 72 梅本吉彦, "別冊ジュリスト:倒産判例百選" 有斐閣 2002
• 73 山川隆一, "別冊ジュリスト:倒産判例百選" 有斐閣 2002
• 74 上江洲 純子, "再建型倒産手續と整理解雇法理(2)" 經應義塾大學大學院法務硏究科 (28) : 2014
• 75 上江洲 純子, "再建型倒産手續と整理解雇法理(1)" 經應義塾大學大學院法務硏究科 (26) : 2013
• 76 朴承斗, "倒産節次의 進行이 勤勞關係에 미치는 影響" 대한변호사협회 322 (322): 3-, 2003
• 77 今中利昭, "倒産法講義" 民事法硏究會 2004
• 78 高木新二郞, "倒産法の改正と運用" 商事法務硏究會 2000
• 79 竹內康二, "倒産判例ガイド" 有斐閣 1999
• 80 高橋賢司, "倒産企業の更生手續で行われた整理解雇の效力-日本航空(客室乘務員)事件, In 平成 24年度 重要判例解說" (1453) : 10-, 2013
• 81 長谷川 聰, "企業讓渡におけるイギリスの勞働者保護制度" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008
• 82 中島弘雅, "企業倒産に伴う勞働法上の問題点" 慶應義塾大學法學部內 法學硏究會 83 (83): 2010
• 83 細川 良, "企業倒産における整理解雇-日本航空(整理解雇)事件が示す課題" 總合勞働硏究所 (239) : 2012
• 84 高木新二郞, "ヨ-ロッパ連合倒産條約の解說と飜譯〔解說篇〕" 23 (23): 1995
• 85 高橋賢司, "ドイツ法における事業承繼と企業再編法" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008
• 86 木川裕一郞, "ドイツ倒産法硏究序說" 成文堂 1999
• 87 高木新二郞, "アメリカ連邦倒産法" 商事法務硏究會 1996
• 88 沼田雅之, "アメリカ企業の經營上の決定と被傭者の保護" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008
• 89 高木新二郞, "IBA 國際倒産協定" 25 (25): 1997
• 90 水野圭子, "EUにおける企業組織變動" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008
• 91 産勞總合硏究所, "2007年度 重要勞働判例總覽" 2007