누구를 위한 연극: 동시대 ‘시민’ 연극의 질문과 연극예술의 경계―<아파도 미안하지 않습니다>(2020)를 중심으로 = Play for Whom: The Question of Contemporary 'Citizen' Theatre and the Boundary of Theater Arts ―Focusing on <Apado Mi-anhaji Anhseupnida>(2020)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The avant-garde of art originates from a new questioning on the utility of expression/enjoyment/creative subject/art in the contemporary horizon. If on one side of the spectrum of contemporary theatrical avant-garde, attempts to expand the sense of presence-based theatrical performance based on technical help can be placed, on the other hand, wouldn't it be possible to position the acting of non-artists? The acting of non-artists shows the phase of maximizing the effect of performing while actively utilizing the intrinsic properties of actors, existential encounters, and plays. If it is possible to give the name of avant-garde to the latter trend, which is the most simple in terms of technology and media, what is the reason?In this study, the performance about the right to disease, <Apado Mi-anhaji Anhseupnida> (2020), and the citizen play <Apado Mi-anhaji Anhseupnida> (2020: planned by Jin-Hee ChoHan, directed by Hye-Kyung Heo) was conducted in March 2020, after openly recruiting participants. From July 11 to 12 of the same year, it was performed at Ieum Art Hall in Daehangno, and was released online from July 11 to August 31. Since then, it has been staged in various groups and communities, and in November 2020, it won the Red Award in the ‘Notable Eyes’ category, and in April 2021, it was nominated for the theater category at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards.
The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of contemporary amateur plays asking questions about 'citizens' and the intrinsic properties of plays such as actors/actual space/audience and their utility.
Chapter 2 examines the forms borrowed from the production, creation, and performance of plays. In the preparation process, various types of training based on improvisation were used as a way for the sick body-actors to face the experiential truth. Instead, he led the audience to the dimension of understanding and reflection. In this performance, the sick body-actor's acting and proper use of form break away from the victim frame where the individuality can be lost, and the unskillfulness, trembling, and accidental tears evoked by the name of an amateur actor create a close connection between the audience and the stage. made it act as a medium.
Chapter 3 analyzes how the traditions and methodologies of participatory theater effectively reveal the politics of difference in the practice process, creation and performance process, and examines the segmentation and continuity with amateur theater that has been linked to political struggles in the history of Korean modern and contemporary theater movements. By utilizing the tradition of participatory theater during the practice process, the actors were able to become conscious of the social gazes embodied in their voices and movements, and to face emotions-thoughts that they could not visualize. The manifestation of the moments of incomprehension that the sick body had to experience is realistic because it accurately analogizes the moments of alienation and inability to communicate that we had to face in multi-layered human relationships, social and cultural networks, and institutional frameworks. Furthermore, the sick body expanded the composition of the group, leading to question the here-and-now economic productivity standards and socio-cultural conditions and climates in which individual people were viewed as alternative resources.
In the era of expansion and development of various media technologies, theater plays a pivotal role in creating an 'organized and public cultural form' for a better life. <Apado Mi-anhaji Anhseupnida> was created by the intersection of the theater's original aesthetic dimension of the actor's body, the realization on stage, and the attributes of play and ritual, the tradition and new methodologies of participatory theater, and the citizen actor who is sick. Just as the stage of a disease-sector play that sought emancipatory identity made it possible to reflect on contemporary cit...

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 민족극연구회, (7) : 1993
• 2 이영미, "현장 예술문화활동과 공동체놀이, 촌극, 공동창작방법론" (가을) : 1993
• 3 양승국, "해방직후의 진보적 민족연극운동" (겨울) : 1989
• 4 아이리스 매리언 영, "차이의 정치와 정의" 모티브북 2017
• 5 양근애, "재난 이후, 극장의 곤경" 공연과이론을위한모임 (63) : 2016
• 6 김재석, "일제감점기 촌극의 한 양상" 국어국문학회 103 : 1990
• 7 조 살라스, "우리는 모두 이야기에서 태어났다(2013)" 글항아리 2019
• 8 김재엽, "연출노트-세월호 이후에, 연극을 한다는 것은 무엇일까? 그리고 극장은 어떤 곳일까?―공동창작 <국가없는 나라: 사라진 기억들>을 위한 창작노트" 공연과이론을위한모임 63 : 2016
• 9 조한준, "연기 교수법 모형 개발 연구 - 미하일 체홉의 '분위기'(atmosphere) 원리를 중심으로" 한국연극교육학회 36 (36): 291-323, 2020
• 10 "연극 <아파도 미안하지 않습니다>. 공동창작, 연출 및 구성 허혜경, 기획다른몸들"
• 11 더글라스 크림프, "애도와 투쟁" 현실문화 2021
• 12 조한진희×다른몸들 기획, "아픈 몸, 무대에 서다" 오월의봄 2022
• 13 조한진희(반다), "아파도 미안하지 않습니다" 동녘 2019
• 14 이인순, "시민예술과 지역문화재생으로서의 연극 - 도시 안산을 중심으로" 한국드라마학회 (51) : 35-64, 2017
• 15 필립 테일러, "시민연극―연극을 통한 공동체, 참여 그리고 변화(2003)" 청동거울 2009
• 16 민족극연구회 대본선편집위원회, "민족극대본선3" 풀빛 1991
• 17 크리스 바커, "문화연구사전" 커뮤니케이션북스 2009
• 18 박상은, "목소리를 마주한다는 것―시민연극 <아파도 미안하지 않습니다×『아픈 몸, 무대에 서다』(오월의봄, 2022)" (215) : 2022
• 19 노지향, "모두가 주인공인 연극, 모두가 주인공인 세상 - '억압받는 사람들의연극공간-해' 작업의 특징과 한계" 한국교육연극학회 3 : 2010
• 20 이호연, "당신의 말이 역사가 되도록-구술을 어떻게 듣고, 기록할 것인가" 코난북스 2021
• 21 문영민, "너는 내가 아닌데, 나의 아픔을 어떻게 전달할까" (183) : 2020
• 22 김병주, "교육연극의 확장 - 시민연극 (Applied Theatre) : 다시 보는 ‘Applied Theatre 와 교육연극의 한국적 적용과 전망’" (4) : 2012
• 23 엄옥란, "‘감각으로써 즉흥’으로의 시각 전환을 통한 즉흥훈련의 일회적 한계 극복의 가능성 탐구 - 루스 자포라 ‘액션씨어터’ 즉흥기술 연구를 중심으로 -" 한국연기예술학회 9 (9): 21-47, 2017