17世紀 南冥學波 動向 硏究 : 鄭仁弘과 그 系列을 中心으로 = The study on movement of Nammyung-school in 17century

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If you want to describe the main academic movement in Gyungsang-wudo(慶尙右道) since the 17th century, we can not exclude the keyword 'Nammyung-Scholarship[南冥學]'. Nammyung-Scholarship is the study to embody the teachings of the Nammyung(南冥). The group that follow the Nammyung-Scholarship called Nammyung-School[南冥學派].
Nammyung-Scholarship has the academic influence in Gyungsang-wudo, from the Joseon Dynasty to the present day. And the phenomenon that to study the ideal life figure of the person, is the distinctive aspects of Joseon Academia. In today Korea, the phenomenon of forming a group as centered on the person, can be explained by the academic and political tradition of Joseon.
Joseon's confucian scholars were focused on the practice of knowledge. Even though his knowledge is great, if his practice did not correct, he could not get a high rating. 'Practice' is not only mean the acts correct in everyday life, but also mean the consistent attitude to political power. Since the Confucian ideal world can be realized through the political processes, confucians are always worried about the righteousness of political power. If the ruling forces were corruption, confucian should be maintain a consistent attitude toward political power. If the group is able to realize the confucian ideal world, they shall participate in politics. This attitude is called Confucian's Chool-cheo(出處). The scholar who faithfully adhere to the Confucian's ideal is Nammyung.
Jung, In-hong(鄭仁弘) is the leading disciples of Nammyung. Nammyung-Scholarship had characterized by Jung, In-hong's reinterpretation. And he had set the confucian's ideal in Nammyung's teaching. Yet Jung, In-hong became the ruler, he practiced the teachings of Nammyung truly. He practice the teachings of the teacher at the center of power, faithfully. Jung, In-hong's idea had a very exclusive features. If it divide the academic merits or demerits by his standard, other scholars can be disparaged. The state religion of Joseon was a Confucianism, and Confucian scholar had politics authority. Therefore, academic excellence has been associated with political hegemony. Therefore, other Confucian groups hated Jung, In-hong.
Jung, In-hong has led to Nammyung-School. Injo-coup[仁祖反正] is the coup that caused by Injo. King Gwang-hae were deposed because of Injo-coup. Political group who supported the King Gwang-hae was a Big-north party[大北]. Therefore, they were removed. Jung, In-hong was pillar of Big-north party, so he was removed too. He had no sin might get executed. His political force was strong, and many people gave academic support to him. Injo group was afraid of Jung, In-hong's supporters. So many people of Nammyung-School were punished by Injo group. Even though there had no sin, many of Jung, In-hong followers were punished. Nammyung-School was suffered persecution, during the Joseon Dynasty.
After Injo-coup, many people of Nammyung-School was removed. But remaining group was planning a coup to political comeback. But it was discovered in 1631. So They were executed or punished. Through this process, Nammyung-School been damaged difficult to recover.
The trace of the past that follow Jung, In-hong, was suspected to anti-government forces. Therefore, Nammyung-School might deny Jung, In-hong to survive. Jung, In-hong's crime was acts that gave anti-Nammyung scholar an insult and supported Big-north party. Therefore, effective way to deny Jung, In-hong was emphasizes that they could not insulting scholar and supporting Big-north party. Throughout the 17th century, Jung, In-hong followers be attacking target.
Therefore, Jung, In-hong had to be negative. The process denying him were from diluting his signs began. His academic achievement went slowly diluted. Nammyung Biography that he writes, and paper that he written to defend Nammyung were deleted during the 17th century. In the official records, we can not find favorable mention about him today.
Nammyung-School was disunited politically. Before Injo-coup, most of them were North party[北人]. But after Injo-coup, North party disappeared. So they were absorbed into the other parties. Most of them became South party[南人]. At one time, South party are homogeneous group, with Nammyung-School. But South party hated Jung, In-hong, because he insulted their teachers. So the group who had intimate with Jung, In-hong, could not be South party. They became West party[西人] to survive. As reviewed above, Jung, In-hong are closely related with Nammyung-School's movement in the 17th century.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序論 1
• 1. 硏究目的과 方向 1
• 2. 先行硏究 檢討 3
• 3. 硏究範圍와 方法 7
• Ⅱ. 鄭仁弘과 그 門人들의 南冥 辨誣 活動 10
• 1. 南冥 辨誣의 背景 10
• 1) 南冥 崇慕 活動과의 連繫 10
• 2) 南冥과 退溪의 相互 認識 差異 18
• 2. 鄭仁弘의 南冥 辨誣 29
• 1) 學問 內容에 對한 辨誣 29
• 2) 老莊爲祟에 對한 辨誣 35
• 3) 淫婦獄事와 關聯된 辨誣 43
• 3. 鄭仁弘 門人들의 南冥 辨誣 活動 48
• Ⅲ. 鄭仁弘의 被斬과 그 餘波 67
• 1. 鄭仁弘 被斬의 事由 67
• 2. 仁祖反正 直後 10餘年 間의 獄事 73
• 1) 江右地域의 雰圍氣와 不安 要因의 擡頭 73
• 2) 朴乾甲 獄事 83
• 3) 鄭澣 獄事와 鄭仁弘 系列의 對應 88
• 4) 鄭暄 誣獄 事件 99
• 3. 山海師友淵源錄의 編纂 過程과 爭點 104
• 1) 編纂 過程과 編纂 意識 104
• 2) 編纂上의 爭點 126
• 4. 南冥學派內의 諸紛糾 145
• 1) 河沆 配享 論難 145
• 2) 晉州圈의 紛糾 155
• 3) 陜川圈의 紛糾 159
• Ⅳ. 仁祖反正 以後 南冥學派의 黨派的 變化 173
• 1. 脫北人化의 與件과 過程 174
• 1) 鄭仁弘 痕迹 稀釋化 174
• 2) 河弘度의 役割 176
• 2. 南冥學派의 西人化 177
• 1) 對應的 西人化와 適應的 西人化 177
• 2) 西人化 樣相 177
• 3. 南冥學派의 南人化 181
• Ⅴ. 結論 186
• 참고문헌 196

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 柳辰熙, "台溪 河 硏究", 경상대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문, 2004
• 2 吳二煥, "南冥學派硏究", 남명학연구원출판부, 2000
• 3 정우락, "남명과 퇴계사이", 경인문화사, 경인문화사, 2008
• 4 李相弼, "임란창의인맥소고", 경남문화연구17집, 1995
• 5 李相弼, "황곡선생일기 소고", 함안의 인물과 학문 Ⅱ, 2011
• 6 李相弼, "南冥曺植遺跡小考Ⅰ", 대동한문학29집, 2009
• 7 金鶴洙, "17세기 嶺南學派 연구", 한국학중앙연구원 한국학대학원 박사학위논문, 2007
• 8 설석규, "南冥學派 政治哲學 硏究", 남명학연구원출판부, 2001
• 9 李相弼, "南冥學派의 形成과 展開", 와우출판사, 2005
• 10 李相弼, "한강의 학문성향과 문학", 남명학연구1집, 1991
• 11 許捲洙, "朝鮮後期 文廟從祀와 禮訟", 술이출판사, 2013
• 12 鄭萬祚, "선조초 진주 음부옥과 그 파문", 국민대학교 한국학연구소, 한국학논총22집, 2000
• 13 許捲洙, "南冥神道碑와 後世 儒林들의 論難", 南冥學硏究40집, 2013
• 14 李相弼, "來庵 鄭仁弘 所撰 南冥神道碑銘 小考", 남명학연구40집, 2013
• 15 李相弼, "來庵 鄭仁弘의 學問性向과 政治的 役割", 남명학연구6집, 1996
• 16 金鶴洙, "‘한강신도비명’의 개정논의와 그 의미", 조선시대사학보42집, 2007
• 17 尹晶, "鄭仁弘의 程朱學 이해-晦退辨斥을 중심으로", 남명학연구24집, 2007
• 18 鄭玄涉, "인조반정 이후 남명학파의 동향과 河의 역할", 남명학연구25집, 2008
• 19 李相弼, "창주 하징의 생애와 남명학파 내에서의 역할", 남명학연구25집, 2008
• 20 金洛眞, "中庸의 관점에서 본 曺植 李滉의 인물평 논란", 南冥學19집, 2014
• 21 全丙哲, "辨誣에 담긴 鄭仁弘의 南冥學 辯護와 그 의미", 남명학보11집, 2012
• 22 金俊亨, "조선후기 丹城지역의 사회변화와 士族層의 대응", 서울대학교 대학원 국사학과 박사학위 논문, 2000
• 23 崔錫起, "金宇이 지은 ‘남명선생행장’의 敍事에 대하여", 2014년 남명학연구 소 추계학술대회 발표논문집, 2014
• 24 朴丙鍊, "光海君 復立謀議 事件으로 본 江岸地域 南冥學派", 남명학연구논총11집, 2002
• 25 김익재, "내암 정인홍의 복주에 대한 정치적 측면의 일고찰", 우리한문학회, 한문학보15집, 2006
• 26 金益載, "來庵 鄭仁弘의 現實對應과 그 門人集團의 師承意識", 경상대학교대학원 한문학과 박사논문, 2008
• 27 이수환, "16세기 전반 영남사림파의 동향과 동방오현 문묘종사", 계명대학교한국학연구소, 한국학논집제45집, 2011
• 28 許捲洙, "南冥 退溪 兩學派의 融和를 위해 노력한 澗松 趙任道", 남명학연구11집, 2001
• 29 朴丙鍊, "南冥學派 盛衰過程의 政治社會的 特性과 士林의 動向", 慶尙大學校 南冥學硏究所, 남명학연구16집, 2003
• 30 許捲洙, "仁祖反正으로 인한 南冥學派의 沈沒과 沙溪學派의 浮上", 남명학연구16집, 2003
• 31 李相弼, "南冥學派의 展開過程에서 來庵 鄭仁弘에 관한 認識 再考", 동양한문학 연구36집, 2013
• 32 李相弼, "南冥學派의 形成과 展開 - 思想과 學脈의 推移를 中心으로", 고려대학 교대학원 국어국문학과 박사학위논문, 1998
• 33 김형수, "17세기 초 대구사림의 형성과 분화 ?손처눌의 '모당일기' 를 중심으로", 역사교육논집36집, 2006
• 34 池柾香, "17世紀初 南冥學派의 處士的 性向과 敎育活動 : 无悶堂 朴絪을 中心으 로", 한국학대학원 석사논문, 1997
• 35 李相弼, "海州鄭氏 家門의 晉州 定着과 學問 性向 : 南冥學派와의 관련을 중심 으로", 남명학연구17집, 2004