호네트의 양육론에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 피히테와 헤겔의 고전적인 인정이론 및 위니컷의 대상관계이론의 관점에서 - = A Critical Examination of Honneth’s Theory of Upbringing - Perspectives from the Classical Recognition Theories of Fichte and Hegel, and Winnicott’s Object Relations Theory -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to Fichte and Hegel, all relationships of recognition presuppose the equal independence of both parties. Two subjects engaged in a relationship of mutual recognition must be regarded as independent beings with their individuality. The same principle applies to the recognition relationship in upbringing. Even if a child appears in a fundamentally asymmetric relationship of total dependence on the mother in a ‘phenomenal’ sense, the caregiving relationship between mo ther and child can avoid becoming a distorted power dynamic only if the child is regarded ‘conceptually’ as an autonomous subject. However, Honneth, who emphasizes the strong dependency and emotional unity between mother and child, does not stress this conceptual aspect (that the child should be considered an autonomous subject from the very beginning) as much as might be necessary. Honneth’s approach is influenced by Donald Winnicott’s theory of mothering. However, it is questionable whether this can be considered a faithful interpretation of Winnicott because Winnicott views the child not merely as a weak and incomplete dependent being but as a proactive ‘subject’ who, from the outset, promotes their growth through an inherent ‘desire’ for selfpursuit. Fichte’s insight that there is a normative force within the humanshaped body from birth and Hegel’s declaration that “selfconsciousness is essentially desire” align with this perspective. All children, even if they appear weak, come into our world already possessing the ‘qualification and authority to become a unique autonomous subject’ from the beginning. A robust theory and practice of upbringing can only begin when this fact is given proper attention.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 엘만, "정신분석 이론의 모델" 하나의학사 2023
• 2 이현재, "인간, 여성 그리고 사랑의 정체성: 제시카 벤자민의 「사랑의 사슬」에 나타난 사랑의 윤리를 중심으로" 7 : 43-65, 2005
• 3 정미라, "성의 차이와 지배: 제시카 벤자민의 사랑의 구속을 중심으로" 32 : 161-189, 2003
• 4 이행남, "근대 사회정치철학의 테제들 홉스부터 마르크스까지" 사월의 책 214-243, 2021
• 5 Honneth, A, "Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte" Suhrkamp 1992
• 6 Honneth, A, "Von der Begierde zur Anerkennung" 15-32, 2010
• 7 Winnicott, D, "Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena A Study on the First NotMe Possession" 34 : 89-97, 1953
• 8 Nuzzo, A, "The Role of the Human Body in Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts (179697)" 71-89, 2018
• 9 Weir, A, "The Paradox of the Self: Jessica Benjamin’s Intersubjective Theory" 32 : 141-153, 1992
• 10 Ciavata, D. V, "The Family and the Bonds of Recognition" 13 : 71-79, 2014
• 11 Honneth, A, "Studien zur Anerkennungstheorie" Suhrkamp 2010
• 12 Bernstein, J, "Recognitiona and Embodiment (Fichte’s Materialism)" 183-205, 2007
• 13 Benjamin, J, "Psychoanalyse: Feminismus und das Problem der Macht" Fischer 1993
• 14 Mcafee, N, "Politics and the Fear of Breakdown" 209-234, 2019
• 15 Winnicott, D, "Playing and Reality" Routledge 1971
• 16 Hegel, G. W. F, "Phänomenologie des Geistes" Suhrkamp 1986
• 17 Rockmore, T, "New Essays on Fichte’s Foudations of Natural Right" Routledge 2018
• 18 Zöller, G, "Leib, Materie und gemeinsames Wollen als Anwendungsbedingungen des Rechts (Zweites Hauptstück §§57)" 89-102, 2016
• 19 Merle, Jean, "Johann Gottlieb Fichte : Grundlage des Naturrechts" De Gruyter 2016
• 20 Alford, C. F, "Hate, Aggression, and Recognition: Winnicott, Klein, and Honneth" 51-74, 2019
• 21 Honneth, A, "Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit" Suhrkamp 2011
• 22 Hegel, G. W. F, "Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts" Suhrkamp 1986
• 23 Fichte, J. G, "Grundlage des Naturrechts nach Prinzipien der Wissenschaftslehre" Meiner 1979
• 24 Hammer, E., "German Idealism" Routledge 2007
• 25 Honneth, A., "Fusion or Omnipotenz? A Dialog" 23-50, 2019
• 26 Abazari, A, "Fichte’s conception of the body: The intertwining of sociality and embodiment" 30 (30): 1488-1503, 2022
• 27 Honneth, A, "Facetten des vorsozialen Selbst Eine Erwiderung auf Joel Whitebook" 280-298, 2010
• 28 Honneth, A, "Eine europäische Ideengeschichte" Surkamp 2018
• 29 Honneth, A, "Eine anerkennungstheoretische Studie" Suhrkamp 2005
• 30 Honneth, A, "Eine Aktualisierung der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie" Reclam 2001
• 31 Khurana, K, "Das Leben der Freiheit: Form und Wirklichkeit der Autonomie" Suhrkamp 2014
• 32 Allen, A, "Critical Theory and Object Relations" Columbia University Press 2019
• 33 Giesinger, J, "Anerkennung, Autonomie und Erziehung" 90 (90): 348-360, 2014
• 34 McNay, L, "Against Recognition" Polity 2008