고기술산업과 저기술산업의 제품혁신패턴 및 연구개발 결정요인 분석: Hurdle 모형과 Heckman 표본선택모형을 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

그간 진화경제학적 관점에서 산업 고유의 특성에 따라 발생하는 기술혁신 패턴을 고찰하고자 하는 시도가 있어왔다. 본 연구는 국내 제조업을 기술집약도에 따라 고기술산업과 저기술산업으로 구분하고 제품혁신 패턴 및 혁신 성과 결정요인의 산업별 차이를 확인하였다. 기존 연구들은 연구개발 수행에 대한 기업의 의사결정 과정에서 연구개발을 수행하도록 만드는 결정요인을 분석에 반영하지 못했다는 지적이 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제를 극복하기 위해서 Heckman 표본선택모형과 허들모형을 대안으로 제시하고, 「2014년 중소기업기술통계조사」 자료의 1,637개 기업에 대해 분석을 실시했다. 분석 결과 제조업의 중소기업이 수행하는 제품혁신 패턴과 제품혁신 성과에 영향을 미치는 결정요인들에 있어 고기술산업과 저기술산업 간 뚜렷한 차이가 있다는 것을 확인 할 수 있었다. 또한, 기존 연구의 한계점을 극복하기 위해 채택한 연구모형의 확장을 통해서 중소기업 연구개발 수행에 대한 의사결정 과정에서 표본선택편의 문제와 허들로 표현되는 문지방이 있다는 것을 발견할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 산업별 제품혁신 패턴의 특징과 제품혁신 성과결정요인을 다각적으로 살펴보았고, 중소기업의 연구개발 수행에 대한 의사결정 과정을 더 깊이 이해할 수 있었다는 점에서 학술적 의의가 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There have been many studies to examine the patterns in innovations reflecting industry-specific characteristics from an evolutionary economics perspective. The purpose of this study is to identify industry-specific differences in product innovation patterns and determinants of innovation performance. For this, Korean manufacturing is classified into high-tech industries and low-tech industries according to technology intensity. It is also pointed out that existing research does not reflect the decision-making process of firms" R&D implementations. In order to solve this problem, this study presents a Heckman sample selection model and a double-hurdle model as alternatives, and analyzes data from 1,637 firms in the 2014 Survey on Technology of SMEs. As a result, it was confirmed that the determinants and patterns of manufacturing in small and medium-size enterprise (SME) product innovation are significantly different between high-tech and low-tech industries. Also, through an extended empirical model, we found that there exist a sample selection bias and a hurdle-like threshold in the decision-making process. In this study, the industry-specific features and patterns of product innovation are examined from a multi-sided perspective, and it is meaningful that the decision-making process for manufacturing SMEs" R&D performance can be better understood.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 이론적 배경 및 연구 문제
• 3. 연구방법
• 4. 분석결과
• 5. 결론
• References

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 박재민, "허들음이항모형을 이용한 기업의 혁신선택과 특허성과의 결정요인에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 17 (17): 449-466, 2014
• 2 김상신, "한국제조기업의 전유방법 선호분석: 특허와 영업비밀을 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 24 (24): 143-176, 2016
• 3 전봉걸, "취업자 특성에 대한 공급 측면에서의 분석" 지암남덕우경제연구원 43 (43): 67-99, 2014
• 4 홍장표, "산업의 기술체제 특성이 지식전파와 기술혁신에 미치는 영향" 기술경영경제학회 18 (18): 147-174, 2010
• 5 손희전, "산업별 기술혁신패턴에 따른 기업의 R&D 역량 비교 연구" 한국엔터프라이즈아키텍처학회 10 (10): 47-62, 2013
• 6 김상신, "기업특성이 지식재산 정책 선호에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국지식재산연구원 11 (11): 259-290, 2016
• 7 노지혜, "기술집약도에 따른 국내 제조업의 기술혁신 패턴 분석" 기술경영경제학회 18 (18): 33-58, 2010
• 8 박성익, "과학기술을 고려한 지역산업구조의 추이와 지역경제성장의 관계 분석" 한국지역학회 23 (23): 117-147, 2007
• 9 성태경, "고기술산업과 저기술산업에서 기업의 혁신활동 결정요인 비교 분석" 한국산업경제학회 18 (18): 339-360, 2005
• 10 P. A. Hansen, "Will Low Technology Products Disappear? The Hidden Innovation Processes in Low Technology Industries" 55 (55): 179-191, 1997
• 11 F. Block, "Where Do Innovation Come From? Transformations in the US Economy, 1970-2006" 7 (7): 459-483, 2009
• 12 T. Kemeny, "The Wider Impacts of High-Technology Employment: Evidence from U.S. Cities" Queen Mary University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research 2018
• 13 P. J. Lane, "The Reification of Absorptive Capacity : A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct" 31 (31): 833-863, 2006
• 14 N. Tunzelmann, "The Oxford Handbook of innovation" 2005
• 15 I. Hashia, "The Impact of Innovation Activities on Firm Using a Performance Multi-stage Model : Evidence From the Community Innovation Survey 4" 42 : 353-366, 2013
• 16 K. W. Joo, "The Change in the Long-Term Export Competitiveness of Korean Manufacturing Industries according to Technology Intensity" 8 (8): 1-31, 2002
• 17 Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver, "Technological innovation without R&D: unfolding the extra gains of management innovations on technological performance" Informa UK Limited 27 (27): 19-38, 2014
• 18 S. Breschi, "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation" 110 (110): 388-410, 2000
• 19 J. Masso, "Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-transition Estonia : Econometrics Evidence From Innovation Surveys" 20 (20): 240-261, 2008
• 20 J. G. Cragg, "Some Statistical Model for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods" 39 (39): 829-844, 1971
• 21 Aija Leiponen, "Skills and innovation" Elsevier BV 23 (23): 303-323, 2005
• 22 K. Pavitt, "Sectoral patterns of technical change : Towards a taxonomy and a theory" 13 (13): 343-373, 1984
• 23 F. Malerba, "Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production" 31 (31): 247-264, 2002
• 24 M. S. Freel, "Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity" 32 (32): 751-770, 2003
• 25 M. Robson, "Sectoral Patterns of Production and Use of Innovations in the UK : 1945-1983" 17 (17): 1-14, 1988
• 26 F. Malerba, "Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology Specific" 25 (25): 451-478, 1996
• 27 J. J. Heckman, "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error" 47 (47): 153-161, 1971
• 28 T. Hatzichronoglou, "Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification" OECD 1997
• 29 Werner Bönte, "R&D and productivity: Internal vs. external R&D - evidence from west german manufacturing industries" Informa UK Limited 12 (12): 343-360, 2003
• 30 OECD, "Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: the Oslo Manual"
• 31 Mark S. Freel, "Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms" Elsevier BV 25 (25): 123-134, 2005
• 32 H. W. Chesbrough, "Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" Harvard Business School Press 2006
• 33 P. L. Robertson, "New Wine in Old Bottles : Technological Diffusion in Developed Economies" 36 (36): 708-721, 2007
• 34 J. J. J. P. Jansen, "Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity : How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter?" 48 (48): 999-1015, 2005
• 35 A. Escribano, "Managing External Knowledge Flows : The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity" 38 (38): 96-105, 2009
• 36 H. Lööf, "Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity : A Firm-level Innovation Study" 76 : 61-85, 2002
• 37 B. Nooteboom, "Innovation, Learning and Industrial Organization" 23 (23): 127-150, 1999
• 38 M. Heidenreich, "Innovation patterns and location of European low-and-medium-technology industries" 38 (38): 483-494, 2009
• 39 D. M. Morris, "Innovation and Productivity among Heterogeneous Firms" 47 : 1918-1932, 2018
• 40 F. Castellacci, "Innovation and Competitiveness of Industries : Comparing the Mainstream and Evolutionary Approaches" 75 (75): 984-1006, 2007
• 41 Aija Leiponen, "If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies" Elsevier BV 38 (38): 1478-1488, 2009
• 42 Andrés Barge-Gil, "Hidden innovators: the role of non-R&D activities" Informa UK Limited 23 (23): 415-432, 2011
• 43 René Belderbos, "Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies" Elsevier BV 22 (22): 1237-1263, 2004
• 44 Emilie-Pauline Gallié, "French firms’ strategies for protecting their intellectual property" Elsevier BV 41 (41): 780-794, 2012
• 45 P. D'Este, "Fostering Novelty while Reducing Failure : Balancing the Twin Challenges of Product Innovation" 113 : 280-292, 2016
• 46 J. Tobin, "Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables" 26 (26): 24-36, 1958
• 47 P. Romer, "Endogenous Technological Change" 98 (98): 71-102, 1990
• 48 C. Köhler, "Diffusion of cim-tech nologies and trends in work organization" 2 (2): 381-394, 1991
• 49 Claudia Schmiedeberg, "Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector" Elsevier BV 37 (37): 1492-1503, 2008
• 50 Lluís Santamaría, "Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries" Elsevier BV 38 (38): 507-517, 2009
• 51 R. Nelson, "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" Harvard University Press 1982
• 52 Wesley M. Cohen, "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation" JSTOR 35 (35): 128-, 1990
• 53 The Small and Medium Business Administration, "2014Survey on Technology of SMEs" Korea Federation of Small and Medium Business 2014