남녀고용평등제도에 관한 연구
저자
발행사항
광주: 조선대학교 정책대학원, 2004
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 정책대학원: 자치행정학과 2005
발행연도
2004
작성언어
한국어
주제어
DDC
351.83 판사항(21)
발행국(도시)
광주
기타서명
(A)Study on the equal right system for male and female in employment
형태사항
viii, 97 p.: 챠트; 26 cm.
일반주기명
각국의 고용평등제도 비교 수록
참고문헌: p. 70-73
소장기관
In our country, in company with the rapid industrialization, the ratio of womem's participating in the economic activity is increasing strikingly in consequence of the inner cause that the structure of consciousness is changed owing to the inhered the educational standard of women, the desire of income of women is inhered, the domesticlabor of women is lessened and so on, and the outer cause that the style of labor is changed due to the development of production technology.
In order to exclude the disparity of men and women in the women's inhered position and their employment, the law of equality in the employment of men and women was made and has been enforced, but there are still a lot to be improved. First, there is contradiction between the labor standard law and the law of equality in the development of men and women.
that is a problem may rise at a particular article about women in the labor standard law and the equal treatment of men and women in the law of equality in the development of men and women are not consistent with each other . I think it is unreasonable in that protection must be recognized not only from the politic viewpoint of the obtainment of healthy women's labor but also from the viewpoint of human rights of women and babies including the basic and universal desire that women produce and raise healthy babies.
And in terms of the penalty for the same sexual disparity, there is something wrong because the penalty in the special law, the law of equality in the employment of men and women is lower than that in the uaual law, the lower standard law. But I think that it is logical that we should establish the phase of the law of equality in the employment of men and women in the system of the whole law as a complementary law, not as a special law so that we may be faithful to contradiction consisting in those two laws. therefore, in case someone breaks this law, he must be punished according to the 40th criminal law stipulating that the heaviest penality must be given when one behavior corresponds to a lot of crimes. And there are a few problems in the law of equality in the employment of men and women.
First, it can be indicated that it is very difficult to judge concretely because the principle of equal pay of equal worth in the same law is very abstract. Thereupon, for the difficult labors in which desires and the standards of various abilities are similar, and which require similar experiences and practicing hours, and similar physical power and knowledge, the same wages must be paid even though they are not the same. I think it is desirable that we should introduce and apply the lowest principle of the need of equal pay in the Europe and the states that appropriate wages must be paid by making a series of standards that can be compared although everyone does not agree with them.
Second, there is no stipulation about whether the leave with baby is paid or unpaid in the law of equality in the employment of men and women. whether it is paid or unpaid, it is imposed on the employer. So we need to make a law such as the social security in the foreign countris.
Third, there are many problems in terms of both efficiency of settlement in the cooation progress of the same law for the settlement of dispate. In order words, according to the 15th article of the law of equality in the employment of men and women, the administrative institute can inspect the enterprises so as to help the settle the dispate. But it has no legal base, so the obligatory right of inspection is not recognized that is recognized in the 103th article in the labor standard law. Thus a suspicion may rise about the possibility of efficient inspection. And there is no problem when both individuals concern application, but when one party agrees the coordination and the other disagrees, there is no possibility of settlement by coordination. therefore, such case must be ruled out of the object of coordination. And in the 6th article in the law of equality in the employment of men and women, the dispute about recruitment and employment cannot but be ruled out of the object of the coordination because the persons concerned have not formed to be the objects of coordination.
The process of coordination in the law of equality in the employment of men and women is arbitary, so the obligatory right is not recognized in it as it is in the labor union law. When a person concerned defies the coordination suggestion, it cannot but be delivered over the suit, when a person concerned accepts it, the force like the compromise in judgment is not given. It's effectiveness is very weak because the person concerned cannot ask for forced execution. In case of civil produce, by imposing the responsibility of proof on the employer, the technical matter of suit agency is solved, but the expense and time for suiting is still imposed on the women laborers. The coordinating committe of employment matters need to be composed of women who know well about real problems of women labor if possible, but that stipulation is not in the current law.
On the other hand, to compensate for the problems of the law of equality in the employment of men and women the law of prohibiting the sex disparity and deliverance has been made. As a special law of the law of equality in the employment of men and women, it complements the matters or problems in this law and broaden the objects to the public institutions. To settle the sex disparity actively, it is included in the 100 national tasks and is treated as one of the core fields of the national policy. To do this, they have established the special committee for women under the guidance of the president.
When a women is treated unequally in a business, a govermental organization, a local autonomy and a school, etc,. she can apply for deliverance to the committee. From the beginning of July 1st. 1999. the same law has been enforced and has drawn a lot of attention in terms of its action. But to settle the sex disparity fundamentally, the renovation of consciousness that can suffocate the inappropriate bias towards women must be done in the first place.
To do this, the universal education of the whole social is urgently needed, I should say.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)