An Analysis of Disaster Resistant Housing in Indonesia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Geographically, the territory of Indonesia lies on three tectonic plates, namely the Eurasian plate, the Indo-Australian plate and the Pacific Ocean plate. This condition makes Indonesia prone to natural disasters, especially earthquakes. At least more than 5,800 earthquakes occur in Indonesia every year. One of the major earthquakes that occurred in Indonesia was the earthquake in Palu City in 2018. On the other hand, the demand for housing in Indonesia is also very high, at least until now there have been 13.5 million backlogs of housing in Indonesia. From these problems, it is necessary to design buildings that meet earthquake-resistant standards and are affordable, such as disaster-resistant house technology introduced by the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing, namely the RISHA House. The research aims to analyze cost and time performance comparisons between RISHA houses and conventional houses, as well as strategies for developing a disaster-resilient housing sector in Indonesia. The methodology in this research is price and time comparative analysis, internal and external factor analysis (IFE/EFE) and SWOT analysis. The results of the calculation of the cost performance comparison show that the cost of building a conventional house is IDR 36,961,325 and the need for a RISHA house budget is IDR 30,393,449. Based on the results of IFE and EFE it is known that the SWOT score is 1.89; 1.32; 1.84; and 1.46. Based on the result, the SWOT diagram shows that RISHA technology is in Quadrant I, therefore the development of disaster-resilient housing with the RISHA methodology can use a Growth-Oriented Strategy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• TABLE OF CONTENTS I
• LIST OF TABLES III
• LIST OF FIGURES IV
• ABSTRACT V
• CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION １
• 1.1. BACKGROUND OF STUDY １
• 1.2. AIMS OF THE STUDY ３
• 1.3. SCOPE OF STUDY ４
• CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ５
• 2.1. DISASTER ５
• 2.1.1. Definition and Types of Disaster ５
• 2.1.2. Disaster in Indonesia ６
• 2.1.3. Earthquake in Palu City ８
• 2.2. PALU CITY １１
• 2.2.1. Geography １１
• 2.2.2. Demography １３
• 2.2.3. Socio-Economic Condition １３
• 2.3. DISASTER RESISTANT HOUSE IN INDONESIA １６
• 2.3.1. Disaster Resistant House Technology (RISHA) １９
• 2.3.1.2. RISHA Panels ２１
• 2.4. RESILIENCE CITY ２６
• 2.5.1. Resilience in Disaster Frameworks ２７
• (MANYENA, 2009) ２７
• CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHODOLGY ２８
• 3.1. RESEARCH DESIGN ２８
• 3.2. DATA COLLECTION METHOD ２８
• 3.3. INTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIST SUMMARY (IFAS) AND EXTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIST SUMMARY (EFAS) ２９
• 3.4. DISASTER RESISTANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN INDONESIA (SWOT) ２９
• 3.5. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COST PERFORMANCE AND TIME PERFORMANCE ２９
• CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION ３１
• 4.1. RISHA’S HOUSING PROJECT IN PALU CITY ３１
• 4.1.1. Construction of supporting infrastructure at the RISHA Housing Complex in Palu City ３６
• 4.1.2. Integrated processes and components in the RISHA housing development project ３９
• 4.2. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RISHA’S HOUSE AND CONVENTIONAL HOUSE BASED ON COST AND TIME OF WORK ４１
• 4.2.1. Unit Price Analysis ４４
• 4.2.2. Conventional House ４６
• 4.2.2.1. Work Unit Price Analysis ４８
• 4.2.2.2. Budget Needs ４９
• 4.3. SWOT ANALYSIS ５１
• 4.3.1. Strengths and Weaknesses of RISHA (Internal Factor Evaluation) technology ５１
• 4.3.1.1. Strength Aspect ５２
• 4.3.1.2. Weakness Aspect ５３
• 4.3.2. Opportunities and Threats of Implementing RISHA Technology (External Factor Evaluation) ５４
• 4.3.2.1. Opportunity Aspect ５４
• 4.3.2.2. Threat Aspect ５４
• 4.3.3. IFE and EFE Matrix Analysis ５５
• 4.3.4. Diagram of Internal Factor Evaluation and External Factor Evaluation ５７
• CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ６１
• 5.1. CONCLUSION ６１
• 5.2. RECOMMENDATIONS ６２
• REFERENCES ６３