스마트폰의 소비가치와 소비만족도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Consumption Value and the Consumption Satisfaction of Smart Phone Users

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyses the usage pattern and the consumption satisfaction and usage value of the smart phone users of the age of 20~40s. The socio-demographic factor, the usage pattern and the usage value of smart phone were selected as the elements affecting consumer satisfaction factors on smart phones. The difference between groups and its relative influences were analyzed with those elements. The results of this study were as follows; First, internet was the most favorite information source of purchasing of smart phones, and the information usage from the sales clerks and the articles on magazine or newspapers were ranked low. The information from the internet is filled with diverse information from commercial usage such as PR or advertising to comments from smart phone users. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the internet sites that consumers use and to analyze the specific contents of the information. Compared to receiving detailed information from other sources, consumers relatively rely lower on the information given from sales clerks. It means consumers need to receive useful product information and not just information that has commercial related intentions from product sellers. An in-depth analysis of the product information given to consumers before purchasing smart phones could contribute to consumers being more effectively informed and receiving detailed product information they wish to learn more about from different information sources. The 50% or more of smart phone users used their phones in the transportation or along/on the streets. The surfing web-site or searching information and entertainments were measured as the main functions of the smart phone usage. Consumers who use smart phones on average of two hours or less per day is the highest ranked which is about 36%. And also, consumers who use smart phones three hours or more show to be about 17%. A monthly average of the phone charge was 71,500. Second, A factor analysis results of smart phone usage extracted two factors of the enjoyment value and differentiate/symbolic value. The usage value of the smart phone showed difference between groups according to socio-demographic factors and usage patterns. The differentiate/ symbolic value was measured high with the 40s, the married and the professional practices. The enjoyment value was high with the married and the smart phone usage case of communication. Considering the short time of release for smart phones and the 93% of smart phone users within one year, the different consumer values with owning a smart phone such as a differentiate/symbolic value to an enjoyment value or another value needed to be examined. According to the usage period of smart phones, the consumption values and evaluation that may change over time is recognized by consumers. In other words, consumers who have a differentiate/symbolic value are more likely to recognize the enjoyment value while they use their smart phone and as they increase their usage period over time. Conversely, consumers who recognized the enjoyment value by using various smart phone applications may change to the differential value over increasing usage periods. Because the usage of smart phones and functions from applications changes their daily life, it comes to be unconsciously a part of their life. Third, the most important details when purchasing of smart phones were found to be A/S (After service), the products and the function. The importance was varied with groups. The women users ranked high with the A/S and the university/graduate students recognized high with the functions. A/S service (After Service being warranties or product replacement provided to consumers) is the most important purchasing factor for consumers when making a decision to buy a smart phone. It means that consumers know the poor A/S service as a risk factor which can reduce the benefits and satisfaction of using a smart phone. Consumer`s dissatisfaction comes from the psychological or economical inconvenience of the current inadequate A/S service. Therefore, it would be necessary to develop a more efficient A/S service and should notify consumers where they can receive this in the future. Forth, when consumption satisfaction analyses of smart phones were done with weight factor of the importance, the design and the function were highly satisfied, and the satisfaction of the price and the A/S were low. There were two contrasting views between the results of purchasing decision and the results of the consumer satisfaction of smart phones. This showed the consumption satisfaction would vary with the importance. The most important influential factor on the consumer satisfaction was enjoyment value, and the usage time, price and functional importance were significantly influenced on the satisfaction. Thus, it is verified that there are differences in usage patterns, values, and importance depending on socio-demographic factors. And also, these three decisive factors impact consumer satisfaction regarding smart phones.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 조광행, "점포충성도에 대한 전환장벽과 이용자만족의 영향력에 관한 실증적 연구" 28 (28): 127-149, 1999
• 2 박철, "인터넷 정보탐색 가치가 인터넷 쇼핑행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 쇼핑몰 방문빈도와 구매의도를 중심으로" 15 (15): 143-162, 2000
• 3 이유재, "이용자만족의 정의 및 측정에 관한 연구" 29 (29): 139-154, 1995
• 4 권기대, "이동통신서비스산업의 서비스품질과 고객만족: 상품력과 관여도의 선행효과를 중심으로" 3 (3): 29-47, 2000
• 5 고윤전, "아이폰 초기사용자 동행관찰을 통한 스마트폰 이용행태 변화에 관한 연구" 한국상품학회 28 (28): 111-120, 2010
• 6 백준봉, "아이폰 시장 전망과 경제적 파급효과 분석" KT 경제경영연구소 2010
• 7 이학식, "실용적/쾌락적 쇼핑가치와 쇼핑만족: 구조모델의 개발과 검정" 28 (28): 505-538, 1999
• 8 삼성경제연구소, "스마트폰이 열어가는 미래" 2010
• 9 김재영, "스마트폰과 소비자유형 전망" (11) : 2010
• 10 양희조, "스마트폰 이용자의 이용과 충족에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 2010
• 11 장은경, "스마트폰 이용만족도 영향요인에 관한 연구" 한국소비문화학회 13 (13): 129-145, 2010
• 12 한국소비자원, "스마트폰 이용 만족도 비교정보 조사결과" 정보교육국 소비자정보팀 2010
• 13 유재훈, "스마트폰 시대의 스마트마케팅" LG Business Insight 2010
• 14 최원석, "스마트폰 기능적 속성의 중요도에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 2010
• 15 정윤선, "스마트폰 AS 이대로는 안 된다"
• 16 이상협, "소비자들의 이동전화 구매시 품질 평가와 소비자만족" 4 (4): 1-20, 2001
• 17 김난도, "소비자는 무엇을 원하는가"
• 18 최영진, "소비자 만족결정에 대한 실용적/쾌락적 결과와 가치의 영향; 인지적/감정적 관여도의 조정 작용" 홍익대학교 2006
• 19 오지영, "모바일 폰 디자인요소에 대한 이용자 가치 연구" 이화여자대학교 2009
• 20 서진혁, "모바일 인터넷 서비스 특성이 이용자 만족과 재이용 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 2004
• 21 신종칠, "모바일 무선인터넷 사용가치가 사용의도 및 사용시간에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 15 (15): 125-143, 2004
• 22 오세조, "마케팅원론" 박영사 2010
• 23 Babin, Barry J., "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994
• 24 Rokeach, Milton, "The Nature of Human Values" The Free Press 1973
• 25 Holbrook, Morris B., "The Nature of Customer Value : An Axiology of Services in the Consumption Experience in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice" Sage 21-71, 1994
• 26 Oliver, Rechard L., "Satisfaction : A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer" McGraw-Hill 1997
• 27 Hoffman, Donna L., "Marketing in Hypermedia Computer Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations" 60 : 50-68, 1996
• 28 Childers, Terry L., "Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior" 77 (77): 511-535, 2001
• 29 Hirschman, Elizabeth C., "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Proposition" 46 : 92-101, 1982
• 30 Arnould, Eric J., "Consumers, second edition" McGraw-Hill 2004
• 31 Holbrook, Morris B., "Consumer Value: A framework for Analysis and Research" Routledge 1999
• 32 Engel, J. F., "Consumer Behavior(8th ed.)" The Dryden Press 1995
• 33 매일경제신문, "2011년 대한민국 스마트폰 보급률 60%"