利子의 새로운 法的規制 = New Legal Regulation on the Interest

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Korea had enforced 'Interest Limitation Law' from January 1, 1962, to January 13, 1998 when she repealed it on account of foreign crisis. However, on March 6, 2007, new 'Interest Limitation Law' was enacted and will enter into force after three months from the enactment date.
The policy of interest limitation not only has long history but also is universal. In the early days, the interest agreement itself was prohibited. Since the modern age, capitalistic thought has regarded the interest agreement as natural and lawful. As a result, there has been a problem of interest agreement for payment of excessive interest. Accordingly, it has been affirmatively appreciated to protect the economically disadvantaged by enactment of a special law 'Interest Limitation Law.' However, former 'Interest Limitation Law' had some controversies concerning the application of the law, recognition of a claim for recapture of excessive interest, etc.
Just before the enactment of new 'Interest Limitation Law,' Koran Supreme Court decided that interest agreement which exceeds socially accepted common idea is null and void, and therefore, a claim for recapture of the excessive interest is possible. The decision is very noticeable in that it raised some critical legal issues, such as what standard of interest which is not socially acceptable is, what legal reasoning which can recognize recapture of the excessive interest is, etc. Moreover, it should be noted that although newly enacted 'Interest Limitation Law' is almost identical with the old one, the former stipulates recapture of the excessive interest.
When I think of the purpose of new legislation, I would like to offer the following suggestions to protect economically disadvantaged more effectively.
First, when the amount of loans does not exceed 100,000 won, I think interest-free loans or interest under half of limited rate of interest reasonable.
Secondly, when the amount of loans does not exceed 1,000,000 won, total amount of interest should not exceed the principal according to the principle of limitation of total amount of interest.
Thirdly, in case that the amount of loans does not exceed 10,000,000 won, relatively low rate of interest should be applied. On the contrary, when the amount of loans exceeds 10,000,000 won, application of relatively high rate of interest would be permissible according to the amount of loans.
Lastly, the above mentioned details should be articulated in a relevant Presidential decree.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "利子의 制限" 1993.
• 2 "利子規制의 變遷과 利子制限法 民法學의 回顧와 展望" 한국사법행정학회 1993.
• 3 徐光民, "利子制限法의 解釋適用上의 問題點" 국가고시학회 (471) : 1996
• 4 "利子制限法의 解釋論的 問題" 단국대출판부 1985.
• 5 白泰昇, "利子制限法廢止에 따른 法律上의 問題點" 25 (25): 1998
• 6 李俊雨, "利子制限法廢止에 따른 法制改善方案" 한국법제연구원 1998.12
• 7 金大貞, "利子債權과 貸付業法에 의한 利子制限" 6집 (6집): 2004
• 8 이건호, "폭리적 고리금융을 규제하기 위한 실효성 있는 입법의 방향" 대한변호사협회 (208) : 2001
• 9 魚寅義, "폐지된 利子制限法의 功過와 그 후의 利子規制의 問題點" 仁齊林正平敎授華甲紀念文集刊行委員會 2001
• 10 백태승, "이제제한법을 강화된 내용으로 조속히 부활시켜야" 국회보 415호 국회사무처.
• 11 백태승, "이자제한폐지에 따른 문제점과 대책" 대한변호사협회.
• 12 신은주, "이자제한을 위한 바람직한 입법방향" 2002
• 13 박기준, "이자제한에 관한 법률안 검토보고서" 법제사법위원회 2006.12
• 14 법제사법위원회, "이자제한법안(대안)" 법제사법위원회 2007.3.2
• 15 魚寅義, "이자규제의 문제점과 이자제한법 부활론" 청주대학교 법학연구소 18집 : 2002
• 16 "高麗時代의 經濟思想"
• 17 사법행정 407호, "韓國에서의 利子制限의 歷史的 變遷" 한국사법행정학회 1994.
• 18 金基善, "韓國債權法總論" 法文社 1988.
• 19 宋德洙, "民法講義(下)" 博英社 2007
• 20 平田健治, "制限超過利息支拂の貸金業規制法違反と特別上告"
• 21 "判例文 : 서울지방법원 남부지원, 2003. 10. 9, 2002가단40115" 2003.10.9
• 22 "判例文 : 서울중앙지방법원 제6민사부, 2004. 8. 4, 2003나56006" 2004.8.4
• 23 "判例文 : 대법원, 2007. 2. 15, 2004다50426" 2007.2.15
• 24 "先利子支給과 利子制限法" 국가고시학회 (437) : 1993.