남북한 경제협력의 불가능 삼각정리와 실천적 협력방안 = Understanding the Trilemma in Inter-Korea Economic Cooperation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Models of South-North Korean economic integration have the problem of circular reasoning. While many studies argue that South-North Korean economic integration would contribute to alleviate security risks in the Korean peninsular, they emphasize the success of any economic model of inter-Korean economic integration is subject to favorable geo-political and security environment. It is a failure in distinguishing between goals and constraints. After identifying three major goals of South-North Korean economic cooperation, this study shows the trilemma among the goals; they are 1) formation of a complete economic community, 2) maintaining independent sovereignty of the two Koreas, 3) promotion of mutual economic interests. The trilemma suggests that it is theoretically impossible to achieve the above three goals at the same time. Only two goals are achievable simultaneously. This study argues that the most practical option is to pursue the combination of goals 2) and 3) considering the complex political and security environment around the Korean peninsular.
Recognizing that North Korea is the least developed country in the Northeast Asia region, South Korea’s initiatives for inter-Korean economic cooperation should focus on assisting industrialization and integration of the North Korea economy into the Northeast Asian regional production sharing structure. In view of the ‘flying geese model’ of the sequential industrialization in the region, the least developed economic status of North Korea can partially be explained by its failure to participate in the production network in the region as well as lack of effective implementation of appropriate industrial policy.
Therefore, promotion of industrialization of North Korea should be the immediate goal of economic cooperation between North and South Korea.
It is an interesting fact that North Korea has rapidly expanded its apparel exports in recent years. It could mean that the North Korean economy is actively responding to the dynamics of international comparative advantage structure, although the production activities are limited to exports to China since the closure of the Gaesung Industrial Complex. The recent increase in apparel export is a starting point for incorporating the Easy Import Substitution fulfilling both domestic and neighboring regional demand of North Korea. It could help integrate North Korea’s industry into the production network of Northeast Asia. An immediate policy implication is that the economic cooperation between the two Koreas should focus on facilitating this process and supporting North Korea’s industrial policy through South Korea’s contribution of capital, technology, and service intermediary inputs.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 양평섭, "한중 교역구조 특성과 한중 FTA에 대한 시사점" KIEP 07-08, 2007
• 2 성경륭, "한반도경제공동체 건설과 동북아평화협력체제 구축의 연계 모색: 구상모델과 전략방향" 동서문제연구원 22 (22): 273-314, 2010
• 3 박상인, "한반도 경제 공동체, 그 비전과 전략" 서울대학교 출판문화원 3-5, 2009
• 4 이종운, "평화시대의 한반도 경제"
• 5 신동진, "통일비용에 대한 기존연구 검토" 국회예산정책처 12-19, 2011
• 6 조동호, "통일비용과 우리의 준비" 한국개발연구원 2004
• 7 김석진, "체제전환국 사례를 통해 본 북한산업개발전략" 산업연구원 131-140, 2008
• 8 조동호, "북한경제 발전전략의 모색" KDI 341-342, 2002
• 9 정대진, "남북한 기본합의서의 규범적 성격연구" 18 (18): 2014
• 10 김영윤, "남북한 공동체 형성전략" 127-129, 2009
• 11 이석기, "남북한 경제통합과 북한 경제개발계획" 171-, 2009
• 12 최수영, "남북 경제공동체 형성방향과 과제" 국회입법조사처 40-45, 2014
• 13 중소기업진흥공단, "개성공단 입주기업 생산성 제고방안" 중소기업진흥공단 33-37, 2008
• 14 Das, G, "The Oxford Handbook of Offshoring and Global Employment" 281-288, 2013
• 15 Rodrik, Dani, "How to Save Globalization from its Cheerleaders" John F. Kennedy School of Government – Harvard University 30-32, 2007
• 16 韓弘烈, "GATT 最惠國 待遇 原則과 南北漢 物資交流"
• 17 Mundell, Robert, "A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas" 51 (51): 658-663, 1961
• 18 Frey, Bruno, "A New Concept of European, Federalism" The London School of Economics and Political Science 5-8, 2009