프로 골퍼의 측면경사도에 따른 하이브리드 스윙에 대한 생체역학적 분석
저자
발행사항
대전: 忠南大學校 大學院, 2022
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사)-- 충남대학교 대학원: 체육학과 스포츠자연과학 전공 2022. 2
발행연도
2022
작성언어
한국어
DDC
796 판사항(22)
발행국(도시)
대전
기타서명
Biomechanical Analysis of the Hybrid Swing on the Sidehill Lie in Professional Golfers
형태사항
vii, 185 p.: 삽화; 26 cm.
일반주기명
지도교수: 오정환
충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
2021학년도부터 인쇄본은 소장하고 있지 않습니다.
참고문헌 수록
UCI식별코드
I804:25009-200000602916
소장기관
The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical analysis of hybrid swing on sidehill lies in professional golfers.
For this study, eight low handicap professional golfers who earn a living by playing golf were selected. And Kwon3D XP of motion analysis program and Ultium ESP for Electromyography(EMG) analysis were used. On the biomechanical variables, Displacement and Velocity from Center of Mass(COM), Body Joint Angle, Duration Time, Ground Reaction Force(GRF), Displacement of Center of Pressure(COP), Electromyography(EMG), Club and Ball etc. were analyzed.
The data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) in the SPSS 26.0, and with statistical significance level at .05.
The results of this study are summarized as follows :
First, there was no statistically significant difference in the duration time for each swing phase on sidehill lies.
Second, there were significant differences in the left and right displacement from the center of mass(COM). The results of the post-hoc tests showed that uphill sidehill lie(USL) was lower than downhill sidehill lie(DSL) at E1 – E6. And there were no significant differences in the anterior and posterior displacement from the center of mass(COM). Whereas, there were significant differences in the vertical displacement from the center of mass(COM). Post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than flat lie(FL) and DSL at E1 – E6.
Third, there were no significant differences in the left and right velocity, in the anterior and posterior velocity, and in the vertical velocity from the center of mass(COM) when golfers swing the hybrid on sidehill lies.
Fourth, there were significant differences in body joint angles each for the hip joint, ankle joint, and knee joint when swinging a hybrid on sidehill lies. The right hip joint at E1, E2 and E4 had significant differences one-way ANOVA results. Post-hoc tests revealed that DSL was lower than FL and USL at E1, USL was higher than DSL at E2, DSL was lower than FL and USL at E4 in angle. The left hip joint at E1, E2, E4 and E5 had significant differences one-way ANOVA results. Post-hoc tests revealed that DSL was lower than FL and USL in angle.
There were significant differences in the right knee joint at E5/E6. Post-hoc tests revealed that FL was higher than DSL in angle. The left knee joint at E6, there was a significant difference. Post-hoc test revealed that DSL was lower than FL and USL in angle. In the right ankle joint, there were significant differences at E1, E2 and E3. Post-hoc tests showed that FL was a higher than USL, but lower than DSL at E1. And at E2, DSL was the most high, FL was the second, and USL was the most low, DSL was higher than FL and USL at E3 in angle. In the left ankle joint, there were significant differences at E1 - E6 all and post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL at E1/E2. At E3, E4, E5 and E6, USL was lower than DSL in angle. In the trunk tilt angle, there were significant differences at E1 - E5 each, and Post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL at E1/E2, DSL was higher than only USL at E3/E4. At E5 showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL in angle.
Fifth, there was a significant difference at E3 of the X-Factor, and post-hoc test showed the FL was higher than DSL in angle.
Sixth, there was a significant difference at E5 of the O-Factor, and post-hoc test showed DSL was higher than FL and USL in angle.
Seventh, there were significant differences in the ground reaction force y-axis(Fy) of the right foot at E1 – E6 all. And post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL at E1, E3, E4, E5 and E6, DSL was the most high at E2, FL was the second, and USL was the most low. There were significant differences in the ground reaction force y-axis(Fy) of the left foot at E1, E2, E4, E5 and E6, and post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL at E1, E2, E5 and E6, USL was lower than DSL at E4.
Eighth, there were no significant differences in the left and right displacements and the anterior and posterior displacements of the center of pressure(COP).
Ninth, there were no significant differences in the activities of lower extremity muscles on electromyography(EMG) analysis in all phases during the hybrid swing on sidehill lies.
Tenth, there was a significant difference in the FACE ANGLE of the club kinematic variables at the impact of hybrid swing, and post-hoc test showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL. And there was a significant difference in the FACE TO PATH at the impact of hybrid swing, and post-hoc test revealed that DSL was higher than USL. Also, there was a significant difference in the SWING PLANE, and post-hoc test showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL. There were significant differences in the SPIN AXIS and SIDE of the ball kinematic variables, and post-hoc tests showed that DSL was higher than FL and USL.
In summary, it is shown that being stability of the forward and backward movements of the upper body is important to get an effective hybrid swing on sidehill lies.
Finally, it may be concluded that it was found that stability is important for the hybrid swing. And it is necessary to get the coordination of the body joints and the action of the ground reaction force(GRF) for a sidehill lie. When the movement of the center of mass(COM) and the center of pressure(COP) on sidehill lies are the same as the movement on flat ground, the effects of muscle action on lower extremities will be like when swinging a hybrid on flat ground. Also, strategic distance and direction can be improved.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)