KCI등재후보
주식회사 모델에 기초한 공기업 지배구조의 개선 방향 = Improvement of Corporate Governance in SOE based on Stock Company Model
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
121-153(33쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
5
제공처
소장기관
In our country, State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) still represent a substantial part of GDP, employment and market capitalisation. Moreover, SOEs are often pre- valent in utilities and infrastructure industries, such as energy, rural development, whose performance is of great importance to broad segments of the population and to other parts of the business sector. Consequently, the governance of SOEs will be critical to ensure their positive contribution to a country’s overall economic efficiency and competitiveness.
Fundamentally, corporate governance difficulties derive from the fact that the accountability for the performance of SOEs involves a complex chain of agents (ownership entities, ministries, management, board), without clearly and easily identifiable principals. To structure this complex web of accountabilities in order to ensure efficient decisions and good corporate governance is a challenge.
In order to carry out its ownership responsibilities, the state can benefit from using tools that are applicable to the private sector, including the ‘Korean Com- mercial law’, the ‘OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’ and the ‘OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprise’.
The followings are the characteristic features obtained from this study. First, the ownership entity should be held accountable to representative bodies such as the Parliament. In order to increase the public confidence in the way the state manages ownership of SOEs, it is important that ownership entity roles are clarified and explained to the general public.
Second, governments should base themselves as much as possible on corporate law and avoid creating a specific legal form when this is not absolutely necessary for the objectives of the enterprise. Streamlining of the legal form of SOEs would enhance transparency and facilitate oversight through benchmarking of Commercial law.
Third, the state should let SOE boards exercise their responsibilities and respect their independence. The boards of SOEs should be composed so that they can exercise objective and independent judgement. They should have the power to appoint and remove the CEO like a Stock Company. The boards of SOEs should be assigned a clear mandate and ultimate responsibility for the company’s per- formance.
Finally, ownership entities and SOEs should observe high standards of trans- parency. They should disclose material information on all matters described in the ‘OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’, ‘OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprise’, and in addition focus on areas of signi- ficant concern for the general public.
This study is intended to provide opinion that will assist governments in im- proving the corporate governance of SOEs. This study also suggest that the state plays a positive role in improving corporate governance across all sectors of our legal system.
In our country, State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) still represent a substantial part of GDP, employment and market capitalisation. Moreover, SOEs are often pre- valent in utilities and infrastructure industries, such as energy, rural development, whose performance is of great importance to broad segments of the population and to other parts of the business sector. Consequently, the governance of SOEs will be critical to ensure their positive contribution to a country’s overall economic efficiency and competitiveness.
Fundamentally, corporate governance difficulties derive from the fact that the accountability for the performance of SOEs involves a complex chain of agents (ownership entities, ministries, management, board), without clearly and easily identifiable principals. To structure this complex web of accountabilities in order to ensure efficient decisions and good corporate governance is a challenge.
In order to carry out its ownership responsibilities, the state can benefit from using tools that are applicable to the private sector, including the ‘Korean Com- mercial law’, the ‘OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’ and the ‘OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprise’.
The followings are the characteristic features obtained from this study. First, the ownership entity should be held accountable to representative bodies such as the Parliament. In order to increase the public confidence in the way the state manages ownership of SOEs, it is important that ownership entity roles are clarified and explained to the general public.
Second, governments should base themselves as much as possible on corporate law and avoid creating a specific legal form when this is not absolutely necessary for the objectives of the enterprise. Streamlining of the legal form of SOEs would enhance transparency and facilitate oversight through benchmarking of Commercial law.
Third, the state should let SOE boards exercise their responsibilities and respect their independence. The boards of SOEs should be composed so that they can exercise objective and independent judgement. They should have the power to appoint and remove the CEO like a Stock Company. The boards of SOEs should be assigned a clear mandate and ultimate responsibility for the company’s per- formance.
Finally, ownership entities and SOEs should observe high standards of trans- parency. They should disclose material information on all matters described in the ‘OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’, ‘OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprise’, and in addition focus on areas of signi- ficant concern for the general public.
This study is intended to provide opinion that will assist governments in im- proving the corporate governance of SOEs. This study also suggest that the state plays a positive role in improving corporate governance across all sectors of our legal system.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2009-06-18 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 | KCI후보 |
2009-06-11 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University | KCI후보 |
2009-04-02 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 | KCI후보 |
2009-03-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University | KCI후보 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.66 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.77 | 0.75 | 0.805 | 0.3 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)