문학 : 이청준의 「소문의 벽」고찰 = The Consideration on Chung-Jun Lee` the wall of rumor

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

When I find what Lee Chung-Jun is evaluated best in examinable his literary fruits, I can mention that he is the author to try to lift up the literature in this land to the intellectual level. He was the generation who had experienced 4·19 and 5·16. It is remarkable that he lived the young period during the situation of the remarkable that he lived the young period during the situation of the political agitation period and the social confusion. This fact is not unrelated that in his works the anguish are appeared as the main theme and Lee Chung-jun also is the author who has as a obvious consciousness as express his novel theory by means of the form of novel. His work is evaluated to evoke the tight intensiveness to readers the structural planning and preciseness, having the basic pattern of the mode of a frame and the techniques of the detective novel. His literature character is soon grafted on his literary fruit, and the object of this study is to appoach these characters in structural way. The time of the wall of rumor is equalized honest restraint of self-statement that is going through two characters with making time of <I> and <Park, Jun> overlap each other. Especially, three parts of novel, that meet the past of <park, Jun> and the present of <I> is universalized a theme consciousness layer ally. And the author also say whatever any novelist has his own novel view and that of such novelist often present through his work as a writer`s life. Works of Lee Chung-Jun is especially placed a strong tendency on later like this. The work of The wall of rumor in 1970`s shows realization and the difficulty of writing novel with the text that has three the parts of narration in novel. And is shows the consciousness of the author through the article of interview. The result of this study is as following. Lee Chung-Jun don`t resolve the original problem of human and society. In that way his world view is exposed the limit which can be called a cynical pessimism. I came to begin the study of his work with the unavoidable limit by the existence of the author before the main object mentioned above. I make a point to the limit that there is the literary elements which is easy to overlook through the structural analysis. The problem awaiting sollution forward is what enlighten the whole picture as I analyze many works published and publishing systematically.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 카프라,프라초프, "현대 물리학과 동양사상" 범양사 1998
• 2 조남현, "한국지식인소설연구" 일지사 1984
• 3 이태동, "한국 현대 소설의 위상" 문예출판사 1985
• 4 김진석, "짝패와 기생:권력과 광기를 가로지르며 소설은" 작가세계 1992
• 5 최재서, "증보 문학 원론" 신원도서 1963
• 6 김교선, "작가의 비판의식" 창작과 비평 1980
• 7 홍준기, "자끄 라깡,프로이트로의 복귀 in : 라깡의 재탄생" 창작과 비평사 2002
• 8 문재원, "이청준의 「<소문의 벽> 연구" (33) : 1996
• 9 마희정, "이청준 소설의 탐색구조 연구" 충북대학교 1995
• 10 김시태, "이청준 소설의 새로움" 현대문학 1984
• 11 임금복, "이청준 소설 연구" 성신여대학교 1986
• 12 오생근, "이청준 깊이 읽기" 문학과지성사 1999
• 13 스탄젤,프란츠 K., "소설형식의 기본 유행" 탐구당 1982
• 14 이남호, "소설 쓰기와 작가의 시대적 역할 문학의 위상" 민음사 1990
• 15 김인환, "모순과 인식의 대응방식" 문예중앙 1982
• 16 푸코,M., "감시와 처벌:감옥의 탄생" 나남 1994
• 17 김병익, "「진실과 갈등」,『이청준론』" 삼인행 1991
• 18 김 현, "「장인의 고뇌와 이청준」,『현대 한국 문학의 이론』" 문학과 지성사 1991
• 19 전영태, "「이청준론」,『한국현대작가연구』" 문학사상사 1991
• 20 김윤식, "「심정의 넓힘과 좁힘」,『한국현대소설비판』" 일지사 1981
• 21 이청준, "「소문의 벽」,『매잡이』" 민음사 1994
• 22 이태동, "「부조리 현상과 인간의식의 진화」,『이청준론』" 삼인행 1991
• 23 이청준, "「문학의 신발가게-이상문학상 수상소감」,『말없음표의 속말들』" 나남 1985
• 24 나병철, "「근대이성 비판,이청준의 초기소설」,『한국문학의 근대성과 탈근대성』" 문예출판사 1998
• 25 우찬제, "「권력의 역설 그 문학적 지평」,『욕망의 시학』" 문학과 지성사 1993
• 26 오생근, "「갇혀있는 자의 시선」,『삶을 위한 비평" 문학과 지성사 1978
• 27 이인옥, "1960년대 이청준 소설 연구" 성균관대학교 1997