KCI등재
연구논문 : 한국 로스쿨제도 개선 및 예비시험제도 도입에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Reform of Law School System and the Introduction of the Preliminary Exam, for the Bar-Exam
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2014
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
415-474(60쪽)
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
Korean Government decided to introduce the American-style ‘law school system’ to reform the long-debated problems such as the abnormal legal education in the undergraduate course, the excessive competition in the bar-examination and the training system of successful applicants for the bar-exam. Therefore, Korean government approved only small number of law schools by establishing the high criteria which were very difficult to pass. Twenty-five law schools with 2,000 students in Korea started in March of 2009. During 5-year-operation period, some problems of new law school system were found and some of them have been reformed so far. We can separate the problems of Korean law school into two categories. One group of problems is short-term problems which are necessary for the soft landing of new law school system. The other group of problems is fundamental problems including the assertion of abolition of law school system itself. When we try to find the solution to the problems of Korean law school system, we had better study the problems and solutions to the law school system of the U.S.A. and Japan. According to the book, 「Failing Law Schools」written by Professor Brian Z. Tamanaha of University of Washington(Saint Louis), many deep-rooted wrong-doings of American law school system have been revealed from 2011. For example, recently most of American top-ranking law schools manipulated the LSAT scores and GPA of new students and the percentage of employment of graduates to get the good rankings in <US & World Report>. Even though one-third of graduates could not find the decent lawyer jobs within 9 months after graduation, average debt of graduate of private law school reached 100,000 US dollars(70,000 US dollars in public law schools). This amount is too heavy burden for each graduate to repay after graduation. Recently the popularity of 200 American law schools has dropped drastically, so the number of applicants of law school entrance examination also decreased to the level of the early seventies. However, with the help of ABA(American Bar Association), top-ranking private law schools lead high tuition trend for the benefits of professors. With the persistent pressure from mass-communication and criticism of conscientious professors, these deep-rooted wrong-doings of American law school system are likely to be corrected and reformed through the market-mechanism. From the opening of 68 law schools with 5,590 students in 2004, Japanese law schools have been in difficult situation because of the fundamental problems such as imbalance between the number of students(5,828) in 74 law schools from 2005 and the number of successful applicants(approximately 2,000) in Japanese bar-examination. On top of that serious problems, Japan decided to introduce the preliminary-exam. system for the regular bar exam. to give opportunity to the economically and socially disadvantaged people from 2011. Unexpectedly, the popularity of preliminary-exam. for the regular bar-exam. exceeded the regular bar-exam. The number of applicants for the preliminary-exam. outnumbered that of the regular bar-exam. So Japanese law schools called for the abolition of preliminary-exam. system for fear of the collapse of law school system itself. As above-mentioned, the problems of Japanese law schools have deteriorated since the opening year of 2004. Finally in August of 2012 the Central Government of Japan decided to establish ‘Committee of Ministers for the Reform of the Education and Training for the Legal Professionals’. And it was expected to finalize its duty in August of 2013. The Committee disclosed its final report in July 16th of 2013. According to the report, the Committee decided to maintain the current law school system for the present. It decided to reform some easy problems of law school system, however it delayed its final decision regarding the difficult tasks such as the optimum number of lawyers in Japan, the methods of reforming the low- performance law schools, preliminary-exam. system for the regular bar-exam. and so forth. Japanese Government decided to create the new special Committee composed of 6 related-Ministers and the Advisory Group composed of experts under its jurisdiction. The newly established Committee will deal with the fundamental reform plan of the Japanese law school system including the fore- mentioned difficult tasks. The new Committee was established in September of 2013 and it will last for 2 years. From the lessons of the American and Japanese law school reform experiences, there can be two approaches for Korean law schools. In the short term, Korean law schools have to improve the urgent problems arising from the 5 years of operation. In the long term, the best policy for Korean law schools and Government is to wait and see the reform experiences of Japanese law school system. Solutions to the short-term problems of Korean law schools are as follows, ① to reduce the excessive financial burden of students (expensive tuition), ② normalize the curriculum operation (over-heated competition for good GPA and for the preparation of bar-exam.), ③ to stop the discussion of additional approval of law schools and reopening of college of law under each law school, ④ to solve the serious financial difficulty of each law school, ⑤ to adopt the 2-year-course for the students with LL.B. and so on. And in stead of termination of Korean bar-exam. system in 2017, it is desirable that either the continuation of Korean bar-exam. system or the introduction of the preliminary-exam. system for regular bar-exam. Lastly, it is necessary that Korean Central Government should establish the special organization composed of related ministers to discuss the urgent and fundamental problems of Korean law school system. And it is advisable that National Assembly should establish the Special Committee to discuss the Reform Plan of the Korean law school system including the preliminary-exam. system for the regular bar-exam.
더보기서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)