LGB와 Barrier에 나타난 X-bar 통사론과 하위인접조건 = X-bar syntax and Subjacency Represented in LGB and Barrier

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this paper is to compare and explain the difference of subjacency and X-bar syntax represented in LGB(1981) and Barrier(1986), and is to study how the theory of the transfor-mational grammar on the X-bar syntax and subjacency has been developed.
The phrase structure syntax of the standard theory has the weakness that it can not analyze the phrase such as "this very tall girl" as the phrasal constituent, since the phrase structure syntax does not contain the Intermediate cafegory which is larger than word, but smaller than phrase. In order to solute this defect of phrase structural syntax, such an X-bar syntax as the following was proposed in extended standard theory.
But X-bar syntax also does not have the device which can re-cognize such an embeded sentence, "John to go' as in "I want John to go" as a sentence In other words, X-bar syntax can not but treat the "to" of an embeded sentence as the AUX But since the "to" is not the AUX, it is difficult to recogize the embeded sentence, "John to go" as a sentence. In order to solve this defect, the syntax of LGB introduced the concept of inflection(INFL) representing tense and agreement(AGR), and came to recognize the embeded sentence, "John to go as a sentence The system-atized X-bar of LGB is as follows;
◁본문참조▷
But the X-bar syntax of LGB raises the collision phenomenon whlch Wh-nouement is collided with I-movement. As the X-bar syntax of LGB, therefore, vlotates Doubly Filled COMP Filter, it makes an ungrammatical sentemce. In order to solute this weakness of LGB, Barrier(1986) revlsed the X-bar syntax of LGB as follows.
As the result of Barrier(1986), Whmovement came to move to the position of specifier(SPEC), and I movement to that of complernentlzer (COMP) And also It was alleged In LGB that Complex Noun Phrase Constraint(Ross, 1967), Sentential Subject Constraint(Ross,1967) , and Wh-Island Constraint (Chomsky)call be combined with sublacency condttlon. The subjacency condition proposed by Chomsky is as follows;
No constituent can move across more than one bounding node in any single rule application(bounding node=S and NP, or two Ss).
But In Barrier(1986), the concept of adjunctlon was intro-duced and could Interprete and explain the sentences that LGB could not solute.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. X-bar 통사론과 하위인접
• 2.1. X-bar 통사론(X-bar Syntax)
• 2.1.1. 표준이론에 나타난 X-bar 통사론
• 2.1.2. 확대표준이론에 나타난 X-bar 통사론
• 2.1.3. LGB에 나타난 X-bar 통사론
• 2.1.4. Barrier에 나타난 X-bar 통사론
• 2.2. 하위인접 조건(Subjacency Condition)
• 2.2.1. LGB에 나타난 하위인접 조건
• 2.2.2. Barrier에 나타난 하위인접조건
• Ⅲ. 결론