응급실에서 사용되는 노쇠 선별도구들 간의 비교: 체계적 고찰 = Comparison among frailty screening tools in the emergency department: a systematic review

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: It is important to identify high-risk elderly patients in the emergency department (ED), and various screening tools should be used. This study aimed to find the most appropriate tool by comparing frailty screening tools used in the ED.
Methods: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and KoreaMed databases for medical literature.
Two or more frailty screening tools were studied. Sensitivities and values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of each tool used in individual studies were compared.
Results: After the screening process, six studies using 12 tools were selected. Most of the tools had low sensitivities.
The sensitivities were 90% or more in case of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy (PRISMA-7). Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tools for frailty screening, Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) and Geriatric (G8) tools were identified for predicting postoperative mortality, and CFS, Fried and Stable, Unstable, Help to walk, Bedbound (SUHB) tools were used for determining bad composite outcomes. The areas under the curve values predicting outcome were as follows: 0.63-0.67 for death, 0.52-0.64 for postoperative death, 0.52-0.68 for postoperative adverse outcome, 0.55-0.64 for poor prognosis, 0.65-0.69 for activity daily living disability, 0.66-0.78 for functional decline, 0.58-0.61 for hospitalization, 0.57-0.59 for fall, and 0.77-0.91 for frailty screening.
Conclusion: It was difficult to select the most appropriate tool among the 12 frailty tools included in this review. However, Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight (FRAIL), Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF), CFS, VES-13, and PRISMA-7 were relatively useful in the ED.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 황환식 ; 권인순 ; 박병주 ; 조비룡 ; 윤종률 ; 원장원, "한국형 노쇠측정도구 개발 및 타당도 조사" 대한노인병학회 14 (14): 191-202, 2010
• 2 원장원, "노쇠의 평가와 관리" 대한의사협회 60 (60): 314-320, 2017
• 3 Lewis ET, "Which frailty scale for patients admitted via Emergency Department? A cohort study" 80 : 104-114, 2019
• 4 Slaets JP, "Vulnerability in the elderly : frailty" 90 : 593-601, 2006
• 5 Kaeppeli T, "Validation of the clinical frailty scale for prediction of thirty-day mortality in the emergency department" 76 : 291-300, 2020
• 6 Balducci L, "The application of the principles of geriatrics to the management of the older person with cancer" 35 : 147-154, 2000
• 7 Saliba D, "The Vulnerable Elders Survey : a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community" 49 : 1691-1699, 2001
• 8 정희원 ; Hyun-Jung Yoo ; Si-Young Park ; Sun-Wook Kim ; 최정연 ; Sol-Ji Yoon ; 김철호 ; 김광일, "The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly" 대한내과학회 31 (31): 594-600, 2016
• 9 Kenig J, "Six screening instruments for frailty in older patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery" 61 : 437-442, 2015
• 10 Soubeyran P, "Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients : the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study" 9 : e115060-, 2014
• 11 Carpenter CR, "Risk factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 22 : 1-21, 2015
• 12 Whiting PF, "QUADAS-2 : a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies" 155 : 529-536, 2011
• 13 Jung HW, "Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population : comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models" 9 : e87958-, 2014
• 14 Raiche M, "PRISMA-7 : a case-finding tool to identify older adults with moderate to severe disabilities" 47 : 9-18, 2008
• 15 Sirois MJ, "Measuring frailty can help emergency departments identify independent seniors at risk of functional decline after minor injuries" 72 : 68-74, 2017
• 16 Wei Y, "Investigation on the frailty status of the elderly inpatients in Shanghai using the FRAIL(fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss) questionnaire" 97 : e0581-, 2018
• 17 American College of Emergency Physicians, "Geriatric emergency department guidelines" 63 : e7-25, 2014
• 18 Fried LP, "Frailty in older adults : evidence for a phenotype" 56 : M146-56, 2001
• 19 Elliott A, "Frailty identification in the emergency department : a systematic review focussing on feasibility" 46 : 509-513, 2017
• 20 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Elderly status survey 2008"
• 21 McCusker J, "Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit : the ISAR screening tool" 47 : 1229-1237, 1999
• 22 O’Caoimh R, "Comparison of frailty screening instruments in the emergency department" 16 : 3626-, 2019
• 23 Shah SP, "Comparison of bedside screening methods for frailty assessment in older adult trauma patients in the emergency department" 37 : 12-18, 2019
• 24 Lin SM, "Comparison of 3 frailty instruments in a geriatric acute care setting in a low-middle income country" 19 : 310-314, 2018
• 25 Ensrud KE, "Comparison of 2frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women" 168 : 382-389, 2008
• 26 Boreskie KF, "Age is just a number-and so is frailty : strategies to inform resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic" 22 : 411-413, 2020
• 27 Rockwood K, "A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people" 173 : 489-495, 2005
• 28 Kellett J, "A four item scale based on gait for the immediate global assessment of acutely ill medical patients : one look is more than 1000 words" 5 : 92-96, 2014
• 29 Meldon SW, "A brief riskstratification tool to predict repeat emergency department visits and hospitalizations in older patients discharged from the emergency department" 10 : 224-232, 2003