『高麗史節要』의 修史方式에 나타난 특징 －『高麗史』 예종 연간 기사와의 교감을 중심으로－ = Characteristics of the Historiographic Method in 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo －Focused on the textual comparison with 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 records of King Yejong－

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Starting from the premise that 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕 is not simply a 'summary' of 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕, this study examined the characteristics of historiographic methods of 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕 through textual comparison with 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 records of King Yejong.
Considering that revisions were made in a short period of several months after the compilation of 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕, it is interesting that a significant number of differences were found in the records of King Yejong.
Whether it was based on the original such as 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 or another original, the fact that there were many parts revised means that 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕 had its own historiographic method and compilation intention.
Characteristics in the historiographic method appeared in various forms, such as correction of errors, conversion from shorthand characters to correct form of characters, selection of ‘the same meaning in different characters(同意異字)’ or ‘the same meaning in different expressions(同意異表)’, and mixing omission and supplementation.
In addition, while the records of 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕, Sega can be confirmed of its concrete facts by comprehensively examining ‘Yeoljeon’ or ‘Ji’, 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕 can be used to find complete facts only in a single record. This shows that chronological format 󰡔Goryeojeolyo󰡕 was considered to allow the records of biographical format 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 scattered in ‘Sega’, ‘Yeoljeon’, and ‘Ji’ to be understood as a single, complete record.
Next, all the 17 articles made in the reign of King Yejong in which the Jurchen were referred to as ‘Beon’ in 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 were changed to ‘Northern Jurchen, Eastern Jurchen, and Jurchen’ in 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕. This can be understood as a process in which the worldview remained in 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 was changed in 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕.
In addition, the reason why both ‘Jega’ and ‘Joga’ in 󰡔Goryeosa󰡕 were changed to 'Jongji' in 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕 seems to be an intentional revision to match the status of the vassal states. In other words, like the usage of Beon(藩) and YeoJin(女眞), the attempt to change the title of the emperor is understood as one of the purposes or intentions of compiling 󰡔Goryeosajeolyo󰡕.
As mentioned in the introduction, this study has confirmed the differences and repetitions in the historiographic methods of the two historical books, but has not gone to clarify the principles and standards. It is, therefore, necessary to conduct continuous and detailed reviews in the future.