독일의 건축공사 대금채권담보에 관한 고찰 = Consideration on Methods of Contractor over Securing Bond In Germany

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Civil Act 665, 1 ordains payment in building contract to be made when the subject-matter finished is transferred, i. e. as those of the concurrent relation in building contract are the transfer of completion works and the issue of payment, A contractor can't get paid in building contract until he redeems most of benefit first in the process of completing works, and transfer the building later. Such as this, a contractor should redeem first in completing works and supplying material in building contract. However, if an undertaker doesn't make payment, it is impossible or meaningless to recover the provision of completion works and material provided by canceling the contract. Hence, the civil law imposes condition precedent on a contractor and accepts settlement of mortgage over materialization of the provision of a contractor as the necessary complementary measure.
As such, our Civil Act 666 ordains an estate contractor can request for a right to settle a mortgage to the subject-estate to guarantee a right to request for payment, which abolishes 'Des privilèges spéciaux' of the past civil law in the existing civil law and regulates new rules following German Civil Act 648,1. Yet, although our Civil Act 666 was setup with the support of the academic world when the civil code was established, there are much doubts in its effectiveness. German Civil Act 648, 1 which had a big influence on our Civil Act 666 has been also criticized in the past as a noneffective system as a means of security for a bond of a contractor and various solutions were suggested to cover these problems.
In German law, the subject about securing a bond of a contractor of an estate construction starts from condition precedent of a contractor and loss of an ownership of material corresponding to the land of building.
German Civil Act 648 complies with the principle of disclosure of registry and ranking, therefore acknowledged as not enough at all for protecting construction creditors like material suppliers as well as subcontractors already in the legislation step. As a result, it tried to solve the problem including dealing with construction fraud through a special law, which are 'Verdingungsordnung für Bauleistungen', 'Gesetz über die Sicherung der Bauforderungen vom 1. Juni 1909'. But judicial regulations under 'Gesetz über die Sicherung der Bauforderungen vom 1. Juni 1909' could not be executed and the problem German Civil Act 648 has come to surface all the more under the circumstances of specialization of construction industry after the World War II. To solve these problem, German Civil Act 648, a was legislated finally in 1993. German Civil Act 648, a leaves German Civil Act 648, 1 as it is, and set up in the way giving a right to cancel a contract itself as well as a right to reject the execution of provision to a contractor partially when a right to request a provision of security and security, according to the progress of building. Hence, Various suggestions and German Civil Act 648 a, which was offered to complement German Civil Act 648,1 is assumed to provide lots of implications in amendment and interpretation of our Civil Act 666.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김증한, "채권각론(7판)" 박영사 2006
• 2 곽윤직, "채권각론 [신정 수정판]" 박영사 2002
• 3 한국사법행정학회, "주석민법, 채권각칙(4)"
• 4 이춘원, "저당권설정청구권에 관한 비교법적 고찰*- 스위스법을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 14 (14): 351-386, 2007
• 5 "민법주해, 채권(8)" 박영사 2007
• 6 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록 상권"
• 7 BMJ, "Zweiter Bericht der Kommission für Insolvenzrech" Verlag Kommunikationsforum Recht Wirtschaft Steuern 1986
• 8 Ernst, Götz, "Wirksame Sicherung der Bauhandwerkerforderungen, BB 1988., Ein neuer Verstoβ in Sachen Bauhandwerkersicherungshypothek"
• 9 "Verhandlungen des zwanzigsten Deutschen Juristentages, Bd. 4"
• 10 "Verhandlungen des zwanzigsten Deutschen Juristentages, Bd. 1(Gutachten)"
• 11 "Verhandlungen des vierundzwanzigsten Deutschen Juristentages, Bd. 2(Gutachten)"
• 12 "Verhandlungen des 55. Deutschen Juristentages, Bd. 2(Sitzungsberichte)"
• 13 Ingenstau, "VOB - Teile A und B. Kommentar, 16. Aufl" Neuwied 2007
• 14 "Staudinger-Kommentar zum BGB, 13. Aufl"
• 15 Schulze, "Schadensersatz bei zweckwidriger Verwendung von Baugeld"
• 16 Weber, Harald, "Neugestaltung der Bauhandwerkersicherung"
• 17 Slapnicar, "Neue Sicherheit für den Handwerker"
• 18 "Munchener-Kommenter zum BGB, 4. Aufl"
• 19 Scholtissek, Friedrich-Kar, "Mehr Sicherheit für Bauhandwerker"
• 20 Oertmann, Paul, "Kommentar zum BurgerIichen Gesetzbuche. Das Recht der Schuldverhaltnisse"
• 21 Elster, "Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, Bd. 2, 4. Aufl" G. Fischer 1924
• 22 Bundesminister der Justiz, "Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, Bd. 3" Bundesanzeiger 1983
• 23 Bundesminister der Justiz, "Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, Bd. 2" Bundesanzeiger 1981
• 24 Teichmann, A, "Gutachten A: Empfiehlt sich eine Neukonzeption des Werkvertragsrechts ?" Beck 55 : 1984
• 25 "Erman-BGB, 12. Aufl"
• 26 Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks, "Dokumentation des Kolloquium Sicherung von Bauforderungen"
• 27 Kohler, Jürgen, "Die künftige Sicherung der Bauwerksunternehmer -Bemerkung zum Vorschlag der Insolvenzrechtskomission betreffend die Sicherung der Bauwerksunternehmer"
• 28 Mugdan, Berno, "Die gesamten Materialien zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich, Bd. 2" v. Decker 1899
• 29 Börstigenhaus, Ulf, "Die Sicherung der Bauhandwerkerforderungen auf neuen Wegen"
• 30 Meyer, Karl E, "Die Bedeutung des Gesetzes über die Sicherung von Bauforderungen für NachkrieBauFordSiGauten"
• 31 Groß, Heinrich, "Die Bauhandwerkersicherungshypothek" Werner-Verl 1978
• 32 Schumacher, Rainer, "Das Bauhandwerkerpfandrecht, 2. Aufl" Schulthess, Polygraphischer Verl 1982
• 33 Zobl, Dieter, "Das Bauhandwerkerpfandrecht de lege lata und de lege ferenda" 2 : 1982
• 34 Leonhard, Franz, "Besonderes Schulrecht des BGB" Duncker & Humblot 1931
• 35 Gutbrod, Max B, "Bauhandwerkersicherung: Der neue § 648a BGB – Schutz oder. Hemmnis?"
• 36 Bundesminister der Justiz, "Abschluβbericht der Kommission zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts" Bundesanzeiger 1992