건축 정책 기본계획 비교 분석 연구 = A Comparative Study of Architectural Policy Master Plans Across Regions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to objectively identify trends and characteristics in architectural policy by conducting a comprehensive survey of 42 nationaland metropolitan architectural basic plans, constructing text-based data, and performing quantitative analysis. Architectural policies in SouthKorea show distinct patterns of change over time. First, in terms of chronological shifts, the first plan period primarily focused on creatingphysical environments and establishing basic guidelines. However, during the second plan period, keywords such as happiness, welfare, andsafety emerged, signaling a shift toward citizen-centered and tangible policy goals. In the most recent third plan, key agendas have expandedto include daily life, the future, and smart technology. Second, a comparative analysis by governing entities shows that the nationalgovernment concentrates on macro-level directions and institutional frameworks, whereas local governments focus on region-specificimplementation tasks. Third, regional differences are also evident. Metropolitan cities place strong emphasis on urban regeneration and theadoption of smart construction technologies to address urban density challenges. In contrast, non-metropolitan areas prioritize improvingsettlement conditions by utilizing architectural assets and expanding social overhead capital. In conclusion, this study provides objectiveindicators for evaluating architectural policy trends and offers direction for future improvements in the upcoming Architectural Policy Plan.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 총 42건의 국가 및 광역자치단체 건축기본계획을 전수 조사하여 텍스트 데이터를 구축하고 이를 정량적으로 분석함으로써 건축 정책의 흐름과 특성을 객관적으로 규명하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 첫째, 제1차 계획부터 제3차 계획에 이르는 시계열적 변화를 살펴보았다. 둘째, 국가는 거시적 방향성과 제도적 기반 마련에 주력하는 반면, 지자체는 지역 특화형 과제에 집중하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 대도시는 도시재생, 스마트 건축 기술 도입에 높은 비중을 두었으나, 비대도시권은 지역의 정주 여건 개선에 우선순위를 두는 차별성을 보였다.