『雲鶴先生事蹟』과 『靑鶴集』 = Unhak-seonsaeng-sajeok and Cheonghak-jip

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In view of the character displayed in the Unhak-seonsaeng-sajeok one must begin by considering the secret as indicated by Yi Gyugyeong: the designation of the author named a geomancer as Wi Hanjo. If this is so, it was the first document to center on the discourses and explanations of Wi Hanjo and his followers disseminated during their travels around the world. Thus, the author could be the follower Jo Yeojeok, known as Pyeonunja Yi Sayeon, and it is possible to pinpoint the year of its appearance to roughly 1648. The version of Unhak seonsaeng-sajeok written in 1648, however, had much less content than the present copy. It is clear that the present version includes concrete summaries containing second-hand explanations concerning enthronement of King Injo and touching on such events as Japanese Invasion of Korea 1592, the destruction of the Ming dynasty, the formation of the Ching dynasty, and the period of Gimpo's reign. This content, however, is neither concrete nor detailed. It is enough to form connections with the characteristics of the secret and reflect upon them. As time went on, more concrete facts than those previously transmitted were added and the explanatory content was expanded and made firmer, being transformed from "The barbarian was destroyed by Choseon explanations" to "The barbarian destroyed the Ming dynasty and the barbarian was destroyed by Joseon." It is also thought to have first included prince Neungyang. Through this process, it was possible to include and describe a lot of history through the inclusion of historical figure. Thus, by adding material, Wi Hanjo's reputation grew as the work was disseminated, progressing through several version. One can draw these conclusions against the backdrop of the appearance in the works of characters from both the latter half of the seventeenth century and end of the eighteenth century. Talking this into account, one can opine that the document's character shows geomancer to be the secret behind the arrangement and presentation of Wi Hanjo and his followers. At the end of the document, Jo Yeojeok, the recoeded author, quotes Westrn Asia monk Neungho's travels document of mountains detailed description of eight places in good place of Joseon, which adds force to this belief. Thus, there exists a high possibility that the actual title is not Unhak-jip as indicated by Yi Gyugyeong but Unhak-seonsaeng-sajeok, as revealed by Jo Yeojeok. Unhack-seonsaeng-silgi and Unhong-yugi, recorded in Imanishi Ryu's collection, are relatively late additions to Unhak-seonsaeng-silgi and Unhong-yugi, which has been retitled so as to make Cheonghak Wi Hangjo the main thrust of the document.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 머리말 2. 靑鶴上人 魏漢祚와 祕訣 3. 片雲子 李思淵과 『雲鶴集』 4. 龍岑居士 趙汝籍과 『雲鶴先生事蹟』 5. 맺음말 -자료의 성격과 저술 시기-

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "현종실록"
• 2 "해동지도(규장각 소장 古大4709-41)중 천하도"
• 3 최창록, "청학집의 분석 연구" 대구어문학회 12 : 1994
• 4 "청장관전서"
• 5 "청야만집"
• 6 "천하도(국립중앙도서관 소장 한古朝61-86)"
• 7 김문식, "조선후기 지식인의 대외인식" 새문사 2009
• 8 서영대, "조선후기 선가문헌에 보이는 한국 상고사 인식-단군 문제를 중심으로" 한민족학회 2 : 2006
• 9 한명기, "정묘·병자호란과 동아시아" 푸른역사 2009
• 10 이민수, "정감록" 홍신문화사 1985
• 11 "임하필기"
• 12 雲鶴先生實記, "일본 천리대도서관 금서룡 소장 필사본"
• 13 김용흠, "인조반정의 명분과 정권의 정단성 논쟁-仁城君 李珙 처벌 논의를 중심으로" 27 : 2006
• 14 "용비어천가"
• 15 "예종실록"
• 16 백승종, "예언가-우리 역사를 말하다-" 푸른역사 2007
• 17 "연려실기술"
• 18 "신증동국여지승람"
• 19 "승정원일기"
• 20 "송자대전"
• 21 "속동문선"
• 22 "세종실록"
• 23 "세조실록"
• 24 "성호사설"
• 25 "성종실록"
• 26 김성환, "선가 자료 『청학집』의 자료적 검토" 국학연구원 6 : 73-118, 2009
• 27 조인성, "단군에 관한 여러 성격의 기록" 일조각 27 : 2000
• 28 "기년편고"
• 29 "고려사"
• 30 계승범, "계해정변(인조반정)의 명분과 그 인식의 변화" 경남문화연구원 (26) : 439-478, 2008
• 31 서영대, "韓國 仙道의 歷史的 흐름" 국학연구원 5 : 7-26, 2008
• 32 揆園史話, "靑鶴集" 아세아문화사 1976
• 33 "雲鶴先生事蹟"
• 34 李鍾殷, "道家의 漢詩 硏究-靑鶴集을 중심으로" 한양대 한국학연구소 11 : 1987
• 35 "記言"
• 36 "老峯集"
• 37 "破閑集"
• 38 "梁大司馬實紀"
• 39 "明齋遺稿"
• 40 "五洲衍文長箋散稿"
• 41 "下廬文集"
• 42 한명기, "17·8세기 한중관계와 인조반정-조선후기 ‘仁祖反正 辨誣’ 문제-" 한국사학회 2002