대학의 가치, 대학총장의 자격 요인 및 선출 제도에 대한 사립대학 교수의 인식에 관한 연구 = The perception of Korean private university professors on the value of university and the qualification and election of university president

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research was designed to grasp the perception of the value of university and the qualification and election of university presidents by private university professors through Internet research. From June 11 to June 19, 2018, 479 of the panels subscribing to the Korea Faculty Newspaper responded via the Internet.
Private university professors gave 1.87 points out of 5 points in response to the question of whether or not the election system of the current president has 'representative of members'. Next, in response to the question autonomy from the corporate board, we obtained 2.14 points out of five. And in response to the question of “reflectiveness of the opinion”, we got 2.08 out of 5 points. Professors had very low evaluations of the presidential election system.
As a result of factor analysis on the qualification of the university president, three factors appeared. The first factor accounts for 24.9% of variance due to ‘industry and development’ traits. The second factor accounts for 21.2% variance in ‘freedom and mental’ traits. The third factor accounts for 16.8% of variance due to the traits of ‘personal character and academic achievement’.
We also looked at the relationship between the qualifications of university president and the evaluation of the president election system. As a result, the higher the score of first factor(industry and development), the higher the representative, autonomy, and reflectiveness of the university president, and the higher the score of second factor(free spirit), the lower the three ratings were.
Professors from private universities preferred direct elections (71.2%) rather than indirect election system(23.2%). However, unlike the expectation of private college professors, the current president election method of his / her university is mostly answered by the foundation appointment system (55.5%) or indirect election system (28.8%). Efforts are needed to reduce the gap between the expectations of these professors and the realities of universities.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 배상훈, "한국 대학 총장의 인구학적 특성, 학문적 배경 및 직무 경험과 시사점" 한국교육학회 55 (55): 53-76, 2017
• 2 이오현, "언론의 ‘대학 개혁’ 담론에 대한 비판적 연구: 이명박 정권 이후 대학 정책에 대한 주요 신문의 보도를 중심으로" 한국언론정보학회 82 (82): 29-72, 2017
• 3 신현석, "사립대학 총장선출제도 개선의 논거와 방안 - 대학 자율성의 관점에서 -" 대한교육법학회 28 (28): 55-88, 2016
• 4 채형복, "민주적 대학 거버넌스와 총장 선출제 : 경북대 사례를 중심으로" 2018
• 5 이효계, "대학총장의 리더십" 143 : 32-35, 2006
• 6 표시열, "대학총장 선임방법에 관한 국제비교 연구" 11 (11): 25-58, 2000
• 7 조홍석, "대학자치와 국립대학 총장 선출방식" 한국비교공법학회 14 (14): 121-138, 2013
• 8 요시미 순야, "대학이란 무엇인가" 글항아리 2011
• 9 송자, "대학의 리더십" (15) : 117-133, 1997
• 10 김정인, "대학과 권력-한국 대학 100년의 역사" 휴머니스트 2018
• 11 차정인, "국립대학총장선거제도의 현황과 문제점" 2018
• 12 신현석, "국립대학 총장선출제도의 쟁점과 과제" 교육문제연구소 29 (29): 105-138, 2016
• 13 김갑석, "국립대 총장 선출의 쟁점과 과제" 대한교육법학회 29 (29): 31-49, 2017