KCI등재
고대 아테네 사회신분의 불명확성 및 중첩성 = The Ambiguity and Duality of Social Status in Ancient Athens
저자
최자영 (포항공과대학교 과학문화연구센터)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2003
작성언어
Korean
주제어
KDC
909.000
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
1-39(39쪽)
제공처
소장기관
M.I. Finley insists that the more advanced the Greek city-state, the more it will be found to have had true slavery rather that 'hybrid' types like helotage. That is, more bluntly put, the cities in which individual freedom reached its highest expression - most obviously Athens - were cities in which chattel slavery flourished. According to him, even when the crisis turned into civil war and revolution, slavery remained unchallenged. And, all through Greek history, the demand was 'Cancel debts and redistribute land,' and there was no protest from the free poor, not even in the deepest crisis, against slave competition. Finley says again that there are no complaints - as there might well have been - that slaves deprive free men of a livelihood, or compel free men to work for lower wages and longer hours.
Finley's view makes the point on the assumption that there was a kind of clear division between freedom and slavery. In my view, however, it is difficult clearly to divide between them, as the concept of freedom as well as slavery exposes itself to diverse deviation.
To comprehend the social status of the polis, first of all, we can set up two categories of dividing social status between public and private relations. In Sparta where the public restriction was somewhat intense, the public law prevailed over the private. The main social casses were divided according to social function. The group of warriors were citizens, and the farmers were non-citizen subordinates. In Athens, however, where the enslavement of human body by debt was in principal prohibited by Solon, much more weight was given to the private order than the public. The public and political power had relatively less influence to privated economic activity.
In Athens, the public status is made on the basis of private relations. It is different, however, which among various social elements was preferred. For example, in the age of Solon, the beginning of 6the C. B.C. the rights and duties of citizens are distributed to the degree of wealth, but the citizen law Pericles in the midst of 4th C. B.C changed it to birth.
As the criteria of citizenship are changeable, and the social status is often dualistic and ambiguous, the dispute was not so sparse. The citizen law itself does not assure the application in reality. It would be wrong to regard the law itself as the real situation. Thus, the foreigner with wealth might hehave like a citizen, while, by contrast, the poor citizen could be suspected as a foreigner. Furthermore, there were not only complete citizenship, but incomplete on like alien residents and citizen's children.
The division between free men and various kinds of subordinates is often ambiguous and indefinite. The concepts of doulos and oiketes include the entire scope from free man to the extreme form of slave who is not free to a high degree. Even the free man might temporarily have the status of subordinate. When anyone, even if he is in subordination, concerned another social status at the same time and could very likely be reinstalled in his former position, it is difficult to regard him just as a slave. We can definitely say as slave a person who has much less such kind of possibility.
The doulos and oiketes in Athens now and then might not be definate social classes but concerned just some kind of duty to a definite subject of rights, and not to society in general. In this case the relation of two subjects does not transfer to the third party. These are different from the helots of Sparta who belong to a community of public status.
As each doulos of Athens belongs to his private master and his degree of subjectivity and personal social situation was not identical, mutual cooperation between them for unified resistence was not posible. This is different from the helots who united to rise in revolt. In Athens, the aquisition of freedom could be acquired by diverse private liberation, as well as overall social settlement of cancelation of debts and redistribution of land which could provide means of livelihood. The cancelation of debts and redistribution of land were directed to a same purpose of social equality with the revolt of the helots, even if the reformation processes was not the same.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)