韓國 産業勤勞者의 建康水準과 關聯要因 = An Analysis on Factors related to Health Level of Industrial Workers in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study conducted from September I through October 30, 1993, in order to provid the data related to the industrial health policy and the development of health education program and the basic foundation.
The data collected were analyzed in order to determine factors affecting knowledge and practice (KP) on health level of industrial workers.
3,396 workers were randomly selected from Kyungki, Inchun, Kwangju, Taejon, Taegu, Ulsan, Pohang, Masan annd Changwon, Questionnaire forms were prepared and the worrkers selected were interviewed by graduate student with the aid of health management.
The result are as follows ;
1. Summary
A. General property
1) Among 3,396 respondents, 2,475 workers(72.9%) were in the male, 36% were in the age of thirties, 33.9% were in the twenties and 19.7% were in the forties.
2) Of the total, 57.4% were married and 40.5% were unmarried and 54.8% of the total lived in middle level and 43.2% lived in low level of the economic status.
3) 5-9 years of Working period on workers were 33.7% of the total, above 10 years were 26.5% and 1-3 years were 18.9%, 12.3% of the total had graduated college school, 69.3% had senior school and 16.0% had middle school.
B. Correlated characteristic and score level of the knowledge and practice(KP) to the health on workers.
1) The knowledge level were 3.08 to 5 points full marks and practice level were 2.79 points which were lower than knowledge level.
2) The score for behavior on health life were 3.73 to 8 point full marks and it seemed to be low grade.
3) As for the general characteristic, It should be noted that the female got the higher score than the male with respect to the knowledge and practice(KP) and the similar tendency observed that the older, a married, the more working period, the more high education workers got the higher score than the other groups. In terms of the score for behavior on health life the male, the older, the more working period, the higher classes workers got the higher score than the other groups.
4) With respect to the general mentality. The workers who obtained the high scorre of satisfaction with work apitude got the high KP score and as for the same tendency observed regarding to the behavior on health life(P<0.01).
5) There was much significant statistically for the workers who obtained the high scorre of satisfaction with work environment got the high KP score (P<0.01).
6) With respect to the contents of eduucation, 5.96±1.62 points were in completed stisfaction and 5.76±1.81 points were in much unsatisfied(P<0.01).
7) There was difference of significence for the fatigue with respect to the dialy work. Fatiguless workers got the 7.05±1.63 points of KP level and very tired got the 6.07±1.94 points(P<0.01).
8) There was difference of significence for the stress. Workers who felt no stress got the 7.05±1.63 points of health KP level and the 3.82±2.07 points for severs(P<0.01).
9) With respect to the behavior on health life, the more satisfaction for the content of education, the higher score of the practice on health level of workers and the same trend observed for the work environment and the work apitude but the opposite trend for the stress and fatigue(P<0.01).
C. Score for health KP & behavior on health life by health level
1) The workers who were good for health status with self assessment responded the high score of health KP and of behavior on health life(P<0.01).
2) The workers who were no absence from work place got the high score of health KP and of behavior on health life.
3) The workers who were being visited hospital and pharmacy got the higher score of health KP than the other groups.
D. Factors related to health KP level
1) Of the total, 64.9% were in middle class, 30.8% were in high class and 4.2% were in low class as for the haelth KP level of the workers.
2) There was difference of significence statistically between the health KP level and general characteristic such as sex, marital status, working period, economic status.
3) There were difference of significence statistically between the health KP level and work apitude, work environment, stress and fatigue(P<0.001). With respect to the work apitude, of the total, 53.0% were in more and less satisfaction and 22.1% were in completed satisfaction and 24.9% were in much unsatisfied(P<0.01). Completed satisfaction group got the high score for the health KP level than the other groups.
4) With respect to the work environment, of the total, 39.9% were in more and less satisfaction and 16.1% were in completed satisfaction and 44.0% were in much unsatisfied(P<0.01). Completed satisfaction group got the high score for the health KP level than the other groups.
5) Those who -felt stress were 92.8% while the case of non-stress were 7.0%, Non-stress group existed in the high level of the health KP.
6) With respect to the fatigue for the dialy work. 74.4% were in very tired and 24.2% were in usual on the other hand, fatigueless group reported dominantly high KP score.
7) With respect to the contents of education, of the total, 53.3% were in more nad less satisfaction and 30.7% were in much unsatisfied and 16.0% were in completed satisfaction, there were no significant difference between the KP level.
E. Factors related to the behavior level on gealth life
1) As for the behavior on health 44.3% of the total were in high class, 40. 7% were in middle class and 14.9% were in low calss.
2) In terms of the score for behavior on health life, the male, the older, the more working period, the higher classes workers got the higher score than the other groups.
3) As for behavior on health life, the workers who reported high class for the more satifaction with work environment and content of education, but for the stress and fatigue with dialy work reproted reversely.
F. Factors related to the level on health life
1) As for the health status level with self assessment, 46.3% of the respondents were moderate, 39.4% were good and 14.9% were poor.
2) The workers who got the high score for health status showed the high KP score 3) There were difference significence between KP and absence from work place statistically.
4) There were significant difference in the existence of visits to the hospital or clinic and pharmacy(p<0.001), and in the non-visit group, the level of health KP was high.
5) The better health status and the less absent from work place they become the higher score of behavior with health life they got.
6) Although it could not judge to be directly related the existence of visits to the health of medical institution with the presence of health behavior, on the ground of the higher score for the health KP level, there was statistically significant difference. (P<0.001)
G. Correlation between relating factors
1) Correlation between gender, age, working periid, satistaction with work aptitude, satisfaction with work environment, satisfaction with contents of education, stress, fatigue with daily work, economic status and education on health KP was statistically positive significant (P<0.001), on the other hand there was statistically negative significant (P<0.001) for the marital status.
2) Correlation between gender, economic status, education, satisfaction with work aptitude, satisfaction with work environment, satisfaction with contents of education, stress, fatigue with daily work, on behavior on health life was statistically positive significant (P<0.01), on the other hand there was statistically negative significant (P<0.001) for age and working period
3) Correlation between age, economic status, working period, education, satisfaction with work aptitude, satisfaction with work environment, satisfaction with contents of education, fatigue with daily work, health knowledge and practice, health life of on absence from work place was statistically negative significant. (P<0.01) on the other hand there was statistically positive significant(P<0.01) on the other hand there was statistically positive significant(P<0.01) for the marital status.
H. Factors related to the health level and behavior level of health KP
1) The variables affecting health KP on general property had 7.3% variance and working period was the highest(β=0.108922), gender was the next(β=0.029891), and age was(β=0.007739), marital status(β=0.031714), and education level(β=-0.053820)(Table Ⅲ-7-3). The variables affecting behavior on health on mentality had 6.4% variance and satisfaction with work apitude was the highest (β=0.105925) satisfaction with contents of education was the next(β=0.055277), and satisfaction with work environment was(β=0.005125).
2) The variables affecting behavior on health on general property had 11.8% variance and education level was the highest(β=0.118380), age was the next(β=0.086498), and gender was(β= -0.020682), marital status was(β=-0.006688) (Table Ⅲ-7-4). The variables affecting health behavior on health KP had8S.0% variance and knowledge was the highest(β=0.020940), health KP was the next(β=0.016034), and practice was(β=0.016034).
3) The variables affecting absence from work place on general property had 12. 7% variance and marital status was the highest(β=0.060172), gender was the next(β=0.021626), and education level was(β=0.031060), age(β=0.037056) and working period was(β=0.093883). (Table Ⅲ-7-5) The variables affecting absence from work place on mentality had 15.5% variance and satisfaction with work apitude was the highest(β=0.098948), satisfaction with contents of education was the next(β=0.071753), and satisfaction with work environment was(J&=0.049044)
4) The variables affecting health KP on visiting hospital and pharmacy had 11.1% variance and health KP was(β=0.023942), practice was(β=0.078889), and knowledge was(β= -0.026393).
2. Conclusion
As mentioned before, it was a serious problem that the industrial workers got the fairly low score of health KP and they did not practice what they know. therefore it must establish the industrial policy and develop the education program for workers being practice what they know and cooperate with realting specialist, the management and the government authorities
In general behavior level for workers was to 50 to 100 points full marks and it seemed to have low score, therefore being insure the good health on workers by usual practice make sweet home, healthy work place and society, futhermore it must contribute the industrial peace and for fatherland to establish public welfare.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 緖論
• 1. 硏究의 背景
• 2. 硏究의 必要性
• 3. 硏究의 目的
• Ⅱ. 硏究方法
• 1. 調査對象 및 期間
• 2. 調査方法
• 가. 分析模型
• 1) 分析모델의 構築
• 나. 變數의 選定
• 1) 從屬變數
• 2) 獨立變數
• 3) 分析方法과 問項 判別力 檢査
• Ⅲ. 分析結果 및 考察
• 1. 調査對象勤勞者의 一般的 特性
• 가. 人口學的 特性
• 나. 社會經濟的 特性
• 2. 保健知識 및 實踐水準
• 가. 保健知識 및 實踐의 一般事項
• 1) 保健知識 및 實踐의 項目別 點數分布
• 2) 健康行爲의 項目別 點數分布
• 3) 一般特性 變數에 대한 保健知識 및 實踐과 健康行爲 別 點數分布
• 4) 心理的 變數에 대한 保健知識및 實踐과 健康行爲 別 點數分布
• 5) 健康水準 變數別 知識, 實踐 및 健康行爲 別 點數分布
• 나. 保健知識 및 實踐水準에 影響을 미치는 諸要因
• 1) 人口, 社會, 經濟的 特性變數와 保健의 知識 및 實踐水準
• 2) 心理的 變數와 保健知識 및 實踐水準
• 다. 勤勞者의 特性과 健康行爲水準
• 1) 一般特性과 健康行爲變數
• 2) 心理的 特性과 健康行爲水準
• 3. 健康狀態 水準과 關聯要因
• 가. 健康狀態 水準과 健康知識 및 實踐水準
• 나. 健康狀態 水準과 保健知識水準
• 다. 健康狀態 水準과 保健實踐水準
• 라. 健康狀態 水準과 健康行爲水準
• 4. 健康水準에 影響을 미치는 要因別 特性
• 5. 一般 및 心理的 特性이 保健知識 및 實踐, 健康行爲, 健康水準에 미치는 影響
• 가. 保健知識과의 相關性
• 나. 保健實踐과의 相關性
• 다. 保健 知識·實踐 水準과의 相關性
• 라. 健康行爲와의 相關性
• 마. 職場缺勤과의 相關性
• 바. 保健醫療機關 利用과의 相關性
• Ⅳ. 要約 및 結論
• 參考文獻
• Abstract
• 附錄(設問紙)