독일 법조윤리규범의 실태와 시사점 -변호사윤리를 중심으로- = The status quo of German rules of Legal profession and its implication for South Korea - with focus on the Legal ethics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With the recent exponential increase in the number of lawyers and concomitant expansion of the market, South Korea legal system is to encounter unprecedented problems and issues. In other words, the past paradigm of our legal ethics is not developed enough to systematically and logically resolve neither present nor future ethical conflicts in the law. Germany possesses legal system similar to South Korea - only with far more extensive history. It has been consistently reviewed and modified to resolve issues raised as Germany underwent significant economic development and reunification, and joined the European Union. Suffice it to say, German legal system is far more detailed and specific than South Korea`s. While two nations` legal system are quite similar, there are much difference in several areas, namely, the overall structure of rules of legal profession; legal case acceptance; attorney fee structure; advertisement regulation; and attorney disciplinary regulation. Comparing the differences allowed us to discover the extent of shortcomings in the layout of South Korea rules of legal profession, and that advertisement regulations are either too ambiguous or too specified to function as positive regulation, which was the original intent. In regard to attorney fee structure, differences were particularly evident in the standard of legal fee computation and contingency fee. Lastly, two systems showed differences in procedures of disciplinary action for violating the rules of legal profession. Based on our study, we suggest a few modifications in the following four areas of South Korea legal system: the structure of regulations within the rules of legal profession, advertisement regulation, attorney fee regulation, and disciplinary regulation. Although it is imperative to review and revise the rules of legal profession to meet the needs of rapidly changing legal market, it is equally important to create a fair and just legal culture considering that a series of corruptions involving judicial officials have led to the public`s incredulity toward lawyers` ethics. Such legal culture will require reawakening of ethical conscience from lawyers as well as individual citizens.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 오승종, "회사변호사의 윤리, in: 아산재단 연구총서 제155집" 집문당 2004
• 2 이상돈, "한국에서의 법조윤리와 변호사의 책임" 중앙법학회 8 (8): 7-32, 2006
• 3 오종근, "변호사징계제도, in: 아산재단 연구총서 제11집" 집문당 2002
• 4 신동일, "변호사 수임비리 해결을 위한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2005
• 5 이상수, "법조윤리의 이론과 실제" 서강대학교 출판부 2009
• 6 사법연수원, "법조윤리론" 사법연수원 2009
• 7 박휴상, "법조윤리" 도서출판 fides 2010
• 8 한인섭, "법조윤리" 박영사 2010
• 9 김성언, "법조비리에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1999
• 10 "독일연방변호사회 홈페이지"
• 11 이청조, "독일변호사의 성공보수규제에 관한 법리" 12 : 2001
• 12 "독일 법무부 홈페이지"
• 13 "Römermann/Hartung, Anwaltliches Berufsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2008, C. H. Beck"
• 14 "Pieroth/Schlink, Grundrechte-Staatsrecht II, 25. Aufl., 2009, Hüthig-Jehle-Rehm"
• 15 "Norbert Schneider, Änderungen im anwaltlichen Vergütungsrecht zum 1. 1. 2007, NJW"
• 16 "Koch/Kilian, Anwaltliches Berufsrecht, 2007, Beck Juristischer Verlag"
• 17 "Kai von Lewinski, Grunriss des Anwaltlichen Berufsrechts, 2. Aufl., 2008, Nomos"
• 18 "Hanns Prütting, 20 Jahre anwaltliches Berufsrecht in Deutschland, AnwBl"
• 19 "Gerold/Schmidt, Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, 18. Auflage, 2008, C. H. Beck"
• 20 "Feulich/Weyland, Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung Kommentar, 6. Auflage, 2003, Verlag Franz Vahlen"
• 21 "Ekkehart Reinelt, Entwicklungen im anwaltlichen Berufsrecht und Singularzulassung beim BGH, ZAP"
• 22 "Büchting/Heussen, Becksches Rechtsanwalts-Handbuch 2006/2007, 9. Aufl., Beck Juristischer Verlag"
• 23 "Anja Steinbeck, Werbung von Rechtsanwälte im Internet, NJW"
• 24 "Anette Baumann, Advokaten und Prokuratoren, 2006, Verlag Böhlau"