원천징수의무자의 경정청구권에 관한 해석론 = The Construction Theory about the Right of Request for Reassessment by Employer and Withholding Agent

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Employers and withholding agents are entitled to the right of request for reassessment on income taxes by the enactment of Article 45-2, ④ in the fundamental law of national taxes. This enactment conflicts with the theory of automatic assessment for employers and withholding agents in Article 22, ② in the same law. Because the automatic assessment does not need to do some special act for assessment conceptually, I will show how to harmonize these contradictory Articles on the view point of the theory of construing law.
I conclude that the government does not have the power of assessment to employer or withholding agent generally when there is no dispute between the Service and employers or withholding agents. However, the government does have such power exceptionally when there is dispute between the two parties. This construction makes a change about the theory of automatic assessment, which is supported by the majority of scholars and the Supreme Court.
I also critique two theories as inadequate, less precise, and less concrete for harmonizing the two conflicting Articles. While the existing theory of automatic assessment is based on objective assessment, the new one is changed to specific assessment of it. I proved this theory through the following arguments：
First, I change objective assessment with specific assessment, which is the requirement of taxation in automatic assessment. This is the same system as self-assessment and assessment by the Service.
Second, I emphasize that the power of assessment by government isn"t in the legal relations of withholding taxes generally, but this is not extinguished entirely. If it is needed, this power comes out externally. Also, I explain that the right of deducting and collecting taxes from taxpayer by employers and withholding agents comes from the law as the position of an individual, not as that of government.
Third, I assert that the act of deduction and collection is connected with the act of submitting the paper of payment records in ithholding taxes, although these two acts are separate physically, they are combined as one tax return as part of the self-assessment system.
Forth, following from the theory of new specific assessment, the existing right to tax refund would be abandoned automatically. But, I interpret the new article as not obstructing the right.
Fifth, I suggest two options of the right of employers and withholding agents for filing tax litigation. The employers and withholding agents have the optional right for two methods of litigation, which are the right of request for reassessment and the right to tax refund. The other is that he has the right of request for reassessment, because it excludes other ways due to it"s character.
Lastly, I proved that this new theory is right through the interpretation of the context of regulation of the same law, which fixed the statutory time limitation for assessment.
Conclusively, the existing theory of automatic assessment has to be changed to the new theory by enacting this article. Accordingly, this new article is harmonized with the theory of automatic assessment in legal relations of withholding taxes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 〈국문요약〉
• Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
• Ⅱ. 원천징수
• Ⅲ. 경정청구
• Ⅳ. 원천징수의무자의 경정청구권
• Ⅴ. 결어
• 〔參考文獻〕
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 南斗熙, "현행법상의 원천징수제도의 조세법률관계에 있어서 구조적 특성" 嶺南大學校 大學院 1994
• 2 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ(제16판)" 박영사 2010
• 3 제차룡, "합소득세의부과대상이되는소득에대한소득세의원천징수의무가누락된경우납세의무자의책임" 31 (31): 1982
• 4 강석규, "직장공제회초과반환금중회원의퇴직․탈퇴전에지급되는목돈급여와종합복지급여의부가금이이자소득세의과세대상이되는지여부" 대법원판례해설 2010
• 5 최원, "조세절차법상 확정 단계론 －조세법상 ‘확정’의 개념과 관련하여－" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 77-116, 2009
• 6 소순무, "조세소송(개정５판)" 영화조세통람 2010
• 7 강인애, "조세법연구Ⅰ" 한일조세연구소 2006
• 8 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2011
• 9 이상원, "인정상여에 따른 소득세의 원천징수와 소득금액 변동통지서의 송달요부" 25 (25): 1984
• 10 최승재, "원천징수제도의유인구조와적용범위의재설계" 38 : 2008
• 11 강남규, "원천징수제도개선방안" 한국세법학회 2007
• 12 김완석, "원천징수의법적성질에관한고찰(Ⅱ)" (97) : 1996
• 13 김완석, "원천징수의법적성질에관한고찰(Ⅰ)" (96) : 1996
• 14 박준서, "원천징수의법리" 2 : 1985
• 15 강인애, "원천징수의무의성격" 1 (1): 1983
• 16 김경종, "원천징수의 법률관계에 관한 연구" 서울시립대학교 도시과학대학원 2001
• 17 최원, "원천징수의 개념에 관한 소고" 한국조세연구포럼 11 (11): 7-54, 2011
• 18 남두희, "원천징수와경정청구, In 조세법연구Ⅺ-1" 세경사(한국세법학회편) 2005
• 19 김태호, "원천징수와 특별징수의 법적 및 실무상의 문제점 고찰" 월드택스연구논집 2 (2): 2006
• 20 최명근, "원천징수관계의 법적성격에 관한소고" 10 : 1995
• 21 이승문, "원천징수 의무의 법률관계" 1 : 1985
• 22 이창한, "원천납세 의무자의 원천징수 의무자에 대한 오납 원천징수세액에관한부당이득반환청구" (44) : 2003
• 23 김완석, "소득세법론 (개정증보판)" 광교이택스 2011
• 24 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2007
• 25 이창희, "세법강의(제９판)" 박영사 2011
• 26 김성수, "세법" 법문사 2003
• 27 김영순, "국세환급제도의 합리적 해석과 그 개선방안에 관한 연구" 서울시립대학교 세무전문대학원 2011
• 28 한만수, "국세부과권과 국세징수권의 기간제한" 5 (5): 1987
• 29 "개정세법해설(2004)"
• 30 淸水潔, "給與所得源泉徵收の 法律關係(2) ― 徵收義務者の法的性格を中心として―”" (313) : 1977
• 31 北野弘久, "稅法學{原論』(第５版)" 靑林書院 2005
• 32 山田二郞, "稅務訴訟の理論と實際" 財經詳報社 1973
• 33 水野忠恒, "租稅法(第３版)" 有斐閣 2007
• 34 金子宏(第13版), "租稅法" 弘文堂 2008
• 35 吉良實, "所得課稅法の論点" 中央經濟社 1984
• 36 김용구, "“원천징수”,『조세사건의제문제』재판자료제17집"