정보저장매체 임의제출 후 집행과정의 참여권 보장과 증거능력 - 대법원 2023.9.18. 선고 2022도7453 전원합의체 판결 - = Ensuring participation rights in the execution process after voluntary submission of information storage media and admissibility of evidence - Supreme Court sentenced on September 18, 2023, 2022도 7453 an en banc decision -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the case of the target judgment, when the principal offender A handed over the information storage medium to B and ordered it to be concealed, B received it and concealed it, he was criminally charged with concealing evidence and submitted the information storage medium to the investigative agency. The investigative agency guaranteed B and his attorney the right to participate in the process of searching, copying, and outputting electronic information stored in the information storage medium, but did not guarantee A and others the right to participate.
According to the purpose of the existing precedent that the right to participate is recognized if the suspect who is not the confiscated is exceptionally considered a real confiscated person, the majority opinion judged that the right to participate was recognized because the right to participate was legally guaranteed, while the opposition judged that the right to participate was not guaranteed because A and others were recognized as actual confiscated.
As Article 219 of the Criminal Procedure Act applies mutatis mutandis to the seizure and search procedures for the accused during the trial, Article 121 of the Criminal Procedure Act shows that the right to participate should be guaranteed to the suspect, and Articles 118 and 129 show that the right to participate is confusing, so legislative improvement should be realized as soon as possible.
If the right to participate is guaranteed to all of them if the suspect and the confiscated person are different, the discussion of the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion is meaningless, and even if not, it is reasonable to guarantee the right to participate by recognizing A as a substantial confiscated person, as in the objection of the target judgment. However, it is reasonable to acknowledge the evidence capability of the illegal collection evidence exclusion law by acknowledging the exception of the law of exclusion of illegal collection evidence, as well as actively confirming the right to participate in cases where there are several people, such as the suspect, the confiscated, or between the suspects, but if it is difficult to identify the suspects at the time or their interests are consistent or very similar, it is reasonable to admit the evidence capability by acknowledging the exception to the law of exclusion of illegal collection evidence.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이승호, "형사소송법강의" 박영사 2020
• 2 최호진, "형사소송법강의" 준커뮤니케이션즈 2020
• 3 김인회, "형사소송법" 피앤씨미디어 2018
• 4 김재환, "형사소송법" 법문사 2013
• 5 최영승, "형사소송법" 피앤씨미디어 2016
• 6 정승환, "형사소송법" 박영사 2018
• 7 임동규, "형사소송법" 법문사 2023
• 8 이창현, "형사소송법" 정독 2023
• 9 이주원, "형사소송법" 박영사 2022
• 10 이재상, "형사소송법" 박영사 2023
• 11 이은모, "형사소송법" 박영사 2023
• 12 신양균, "형사소송법" 박영사 2022
• 13 송광섭, "형사소송법" 형설출판사 2019
• 14 손동권, "형사소송법" 세창출판사 2022
• 15 배종대, "형사소송법" 홍문사 2022
• 16 배종대, "형사소송법" 홍문사 2016
• 17 박찬걸, "형사소송법" 박영사 2020
• 18 노명선, "형사소송법" 성균관대학교 출판부 2017
• 19 강동범, "체포현장에서 임의제출한 휴대폰의 압수와 저장정보의 수집" 한국형사소송법학회 13 (13): 33-60, 2021
• 20 이흔재, "제3자 보관 전자정보에 대한 압수·수색영장의 집행과 피의자의 절차적 권리" 대검찰청 (76) : 155-184, 2022
• 21 조광훈, "정보저장매체의 분석행위의 입법론에 대한 타당성 검토" 대검찰청 (44) : 31-75, 2014
• 22 권창국, "임의제출에 의한 수사기관의 전자정보 압수와 관련한 제 문제의 검토 - 대상판례: 대법원 2021. 11. 18. 선고 2016도348 전원합의체 판결 및 대법원 2022. 1. 27. 선고 2021도11170 판결" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 225-264, 2022
• 23 김정한, "임의제출물의 압수에 관한 실무적 고찰" 대검찰청 (68) : 230-267, 2020
• 24 김정한, "실무형사소송법" 준커뮤니케이션즈 2020
• 25 신동운, "신형사소송법" 법문사 2014
• 26 정웅석, "신형사소송법" 박영사 2023
• 27 최병각, "디지털 증거의 압수수색에서 관련성과 참여권" 한국형사법학회 35 (35): 307-342, 2023
• 28 구길모, "디지털 증거 압수·수색과 참여권보장 - 피의자와 피압수자가 일치하지 않는 경우를 중심으로" 한국형사법학회 34 (34): 219-248, 2022
• 29 소재환 ; 이선화, "디지털 증거 압수·수색 시 참여권자 관련 실무상 문제 - 대법원의 ‘실질적 피압수자’ 법리 중심으로 -" 대검찰청 (77) : 334-368, 2022
• 30 이완규, "디지털 증거 압수 절차상 피압수자 참여 방식과 관련성 범위 밖의 별건 증거 압수 방법" 대검찰청 (48) : 90-158, 2015
• 31 전치홍, "대법원의 참여권 법리에 대한 비판적 검토 -대법원 2021. 11. 18. 선고 2016도348 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로-" 한국형사소송법학회 14 (14): 1-42, 2022
• 32 김정헌, "강제수사실무 절차론" 박영사 2023
• 33 강동범, "2021년도 형사소송법 판례 회고" 한국형사판례연구회 30 : 571-635, 2022