高麗時代農民의 社會經濟的 性格에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Socio-Economic Conditions of the Peasants in Koryo Dynasty(918-1302)
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1975
작성언어
Korean
KDC
040.000
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
175-275(101쪽)
제공처
소장기관
A history may be divided in to many epochs. It means that we should understand a history as evolutionary one. In Korean socio-economic history, however, there are many divergent opinions even to the socio-economic conditions of the peasant in Koryo Dynasty. Some scholar claim that the peasant is not feudalistic but antiquity, and some other claim adversely.
The reason why there are so many opinions about the socio-economic conditions of the peasans of that period is following. First, there is no general theory of socio-economic history all over the world. Second, until now the socio-economic historians used only the frame work of the history of Western Europe. Third, there is no frame of reference to divide a history into many epochs. Last, there are many different interpretation of the historical materials.
The process of the socio-economic development in any country, I think, would be very different according to the geographical conditions, the relations between neighboring countries, and the character of the people. Therefore, we must consider the circumstances of the socio-economic history of the specific country, and then should deduct the category of socio-economic history from each country in comparing with other countries. By doing so, we can induce a theory of the socio-economic history.
We should establish the correct concept of socio-economic history, particularly feudalism. By the results of studing Western European history, feudalism and manorial system is very different from each other. "Though an essential element in feudal society, the manor was in itself an older institution, and was destined to last much longer. In the interests of sound terminology it is important that two ideas should be kept clearly separate." In socio-economic history, essential element is manorial system. In manorial system the landlords exploited peasants by feudalistic land tenure, but the peasants also had the rights of holding their land.
Historically the process of production would be evolved as following: primitive production by common work, individualistic production of each peasant's household, and large scale production of capitalistic society. According to above the process the land tenure would be changed. As we see, in feudalistic society land system has dual character. So we should have two different view on the land system. One is the view of the possession by self-working, other is the view of alienated worker. In historical perspective, the land possession by self-working had been developed by rejecting the feudalistic land system.
The socio-economic conditions of peasants has been regulated many aspects, for example, land tenure, social status and the organization of agricultural production.
In the middle period of Koryo dynasty, the land system called 'chon-shikoa' began to collapse. So the scop of this thesis is limited to early Koryo Dinasty.
In chapter Ⅱ, I have viewed the preceding works on the socio-economic conditions of the peasants in Koryo dynasty and made a criticism on them.
In chapterⅢ, the study on the socio-economic conditions of the common peasants has been made; in positive aspects it is necessary to appreciate completely the concept chong(丁) for understanding the socio-economic history of Koryo dinasty. 'Chong' means not only an adult man but an established area of arable land or arable land itself. And it an essential element to understand the chong on which socio-economic and military institutions have been established. From a comparative view of socio-economic, 'chong' is similar to 'virgate' or 'Hufe' which is a typical holding of villein mediaval society of Europe.
The state had given a typical household of common peasants one 'chong', that is, an established area of arable land,
Full 'chong' was seventeen kyol which is equal to about thirty acres. Comparing with about two acres of average landholding of present peasant, full 'chong' is too large to think it as a typical holding of common peasants in Koryo dynasty. At that fimne, the method of the land use was different from present one. On account fo the lack of manure the land should be followed in one year or two yeas for the recovery of land fertility. It is similar to the medieval western Europe in which the use of land was three field system. However, it is important for us recognize the fact that the fallow of land is not to mean simply to dispose land in natural state. The peasants should reserve the land in culture for recovery of land fertility. Also the land productivity was much lower than the present, about three times, On the other hand the labor productivity was very very lower than the present, about nine times. And natural catastrophe was very severe. In such situation, the paternal extended family system and village community could secure the living and production of the peasants. And then the dynasty had utilized both systems mentioned above for collecting feudal land tax. But the unit of agricultural production was the paterna extended family. Therefore the nature of productive process is individualistic one.
In Koryo dinasty a common peasant, 'chongho' was received 'min-chon', 'folk land', from the state on the condition of the contribution of some services and land tax. 'min-chon' was called otherwise 'kong-chon', 'public Land', but in fact the cultivator of 'min-chon' is a peasant proprietor. They were the fundamental elements of Koryo dinasty. However, all the peasants were not 'chong-ho'. Some of them were 'baek-chong' who were not received 'min-chon'. They can hold of arable land by eclaiming waste land. Some of them were sharecroppers of 'sa-chon' which have been given the nobility. They also had to contribute a labour services to the state.
In chapterⅣ, the socio-economic conditions of specific peasants of early Koryo dinasty has been studied, thhre were 'no-bee' who were slave in social status. Especially the administrative districts were divided according to the social status. Therefore there were many titles of districts, for example, 'chu', 'gun', 'hyn', hyang', 'so', 'bookok' 'cheo' 'and' 'chang'. Among them 'chu', 'gun', and 'hun' were common administrative districts. 'So' was the region of the handicraftmen who had to contribute their products to the ruler of them.
'Bookok' and 'hyand' were humble districts in social status. Their origin was the penalty of the rebellion by someone of the administartive districts. It is supposed that the men of that district were not mobilized as soldier, so that their labor services to the state was very severe. Of course the peasants of 'bookok' had to pay land tax. 'Cheo' and 'chang' wete similar to the manor in medeval Europe, and they were subijected to king' a palace, Buddhistic temples, and nobility. The peasants of them had to contribute land tax, labor services and other contributions.
As said above, here were so many different social status in the peasants, but in socio-economic aspects we can find a common factor which is essential in feudalistic society. In feudal society, the landlords exploited a direcr producer through the possession of land and by non-economic power, that is, a feudalistic land system.
The reason why Koryo dynasty had divided the country into the minor administrative districts according to the social status is that the dynasty aims to govern the people seperately for efficient administration purpose. Similar phenomenon were in Japanese premodern society.
In historical perspective, the increase of land productivity and labor productivity through the change of the method of land use, the paterial extended family system had transformed to the nuclear family system, and the village community had been changed in the nature.
In the Reform of Land at the end of Koryo dynasty and the beginning of Lee dynasty, the private land property had been settled by the growth of peasant proprietorship.
In short, from the middle period of Koryo dynasty the state feudalistic society had changing to the private feudalistic society.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)