『樸素村話』를 통해 본 18세기 보수적 지식인의 모습 = The feature of conservative intellectual as seen through "BakSoChonHwa(『樸素村話』)" in the eighteenth century

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There was much debate about "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)" in the eighteenth century. But it was the natural process for change of idea in the those days when the demand toward modernization was strong. Since the theorists of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)" who have been estimated much lower than the ones of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", or kept at a distance by investigators, I hope to explain the value of persons, "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", who tried to play important roles from the middle to modern ages, with the feature of conservative intellectual as seen through "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", written by Lee dong-yun(이동윤)During from the post the eighteenth to the early the nineteenth century, not only the result of prosperity and stability of "Cheong(淸)", ignored as barbarians, but also the realism instead the just cause made the concept of "BanCeongBookBeol(反淸北伐)" that followed "Song See-yeol(송시열)" account little step by step. But Lee dong-yun(이동윤) is a real scholar who tried to recover the national bases of self-respect that had been injured by "Cheong(?)", only to fail.
He considered deeply for his whole life the importances of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", exclusive theory for "HwaLee(華夷)", and national bases of self-respect. In Lee dong-yun(이동윤)‘s sense, "Hwa(華)" was different from "Lee(夷) at "Mulseong(物性)" and "Inseong(人性)". What was worse, Choseon lost "Cheong Country's Invasion df Korea in 1636 to "Cheong(?)", He advocated that Choseon," Hwa(華), must tried to recover the national bases of self-respect from "Cheong(?)", founded by Lee(夷) as barbarians. Lee dong-you(이동윤) could not accept the fact that Cheong(?) had gained the victory over "Myeong(明)", Hwa(華) like Choseon. So he seemed to think that only the choice of "BanCeongBookBeol(反淸北伐) was the shorter road, where the people of Choseon could recover the national bases of self-respect but also existing order from the wrong world of Lee(夷).
Human history has been developed through conflict and confrontation by the forces that were different from their goals. It is not right if only one is good and the other bad. Human history has existed with the two other forces. Finally, such idea and literature as Lee dong-yun(이동윤)‘s are full of suggestions for us in our won day.There was much debate about "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)" in the eighteenth century. But it was the natural process for change of idea in the those days when the demand toward modernization was strong. Since the theorists of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)" who have been estimated much lower than the ones of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", or kept at a distance by investigators, I hope to explain the value of persons, "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", who tried to play important roles from the middle to modern ages, with the feature of conservative intellectual as seen through "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", written by Lee dong-yun(이동윤)During from the post the eighteenth to the early the nineteenth century, not only the result of prosperity and stability of "Cheong(淸)", ignored as barbarians, but also the realism instead the just cause made the concept of "BanCeongBookBeol(反淸北伐)" that followed "Song See-yeol(송시열)" account little step by step. But Lee dong-yun(이동윤) is a real scholar who tried to recover the national bases of self-respect that had been injured by "Cheong(?)", only to fail.
He considered deeply for his whole life the importances of "Inmulseongdonglee(人物性同異)", exclusive theory for "HwaLee(華夷)", and national bases of self-respect. In Lee dong-yun(이동윤)‘s sense, "Hwa(華)" was different from "Lee(夷) at "Mulseong(物性)" and "Inseong(人性)". What was worse, Choseon lost "Cheong Country's Invasion df Korea in 1636 to "Cheong(?)", He advocated that Choseon," Hwa(華), must tried to recover the national bases of self-respect from "Cheong(?)", founded by Lee(夷) as barbarians. Lee dong-you(이동윤) could not accept the fact that Cheong(?) had gained the victory over "Myeong(明)", Hwa(華) like Choseon. So he seemed to think that only the choice of "BanCeongBookBeol(反淸北伐) was the shorter road, where the people of Choseon could recover the national bases of self-respect but also existing order from the wrong world of Lee(夷).
Human history has been developed through conflict and confrontation by the forces that were different from their goals. It is not right if only one is good and the other bad. Human history has existed with the two other forces. Finally, such idea and literature as Lee dong-yun(이동윤)‘s are full of suggestions for us in our won day.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 李東允과 『樸素村話』
• 3.『樸素村話』소재 ‘戰亂談’과 보수적 지식인의 고뇌
• 4. 결론