KCI등재
17~18세기 조일무역에서 ‘私貿易 斷絶論’과 ‘나가사키[長崎] 直交易論’에 대한 硏究史 검토 = Reviews on History of Research on Changes in Trade between Joseon and Japan in the 17th and 18th Centuries
저자
김동철 (부산대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2012
작성언어
Korean
주제어
KDC
900
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
307-339(33쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
7
제공처
In the late Joseon period, the trade between Joseon and Japan was developed with a focus on private trade. After the seventeenth century, the private trade was developed in two types - one is the trade between ginseng from Joseon and silver from Japan and the other is the intermediate trade done by Joseon between raw-silk fabrics from China and silver from Japan. The trade between ginseng and silver dramatically changed since the 1750s and so the intermediate trade between raw-silk fabrics and silver since the 1740s. In the nineteenth century, cowhide from Joseon and copper from Japan were main goods for the private trade.
Although the private trade accounted for approximately 70% in the 1720s and 1730s, it decreased to approximately 20% between the 1810s and 1840s. Accordingly, the private trade declined. Even though the private trade declined, it was not entirely lost. Nevertheless, some Japanese researchers said that the private trade was abolished in the 1770s. This is based on the position of the Tsushima han in Japan. They tried to have financial support from the Japanese government, the Tokugawa Shogunate, on the pretext that the private trade was abolished.
There is a dominant view that the decisive reason for the declination of private trade is that Japan conducted direct trade with Qing in Nagasaki since the 1740s and 1750s. In other words, the intermediate trade conducted by Joseon had been declined since the direct trade in Nagasaki. The approximately 80 percent of the exports in private trade was exported by the intermediate trade. Therefore, the declination of intermediate trade was directly linked to the declination of private trade.
The direct trade between Qing and Japan was interrupted between 1661 and 1684. In 1684, Qing Dynasty lifted the sea ban(海禁 ; Haijin). However, the lifting of the ban was not directly linked to the development of trade in both countries. Since 1685, the basic trade policy in Japan against Qing Dynasty was the trade control policy. The same applied to the Japanese trade policy against Joseon Dynasty. Therefore, we consider that it is necessary to correct the claim that there was a large change in the trade between Joseon and Japan, Joseon and Japan in the 1720s or 1730s by the effect of the direct trade between Qing and Japan in Nagasaki. In particular, we think that too much emphasis should not been placed upon the intermediate trade conducted by Joseon during the direct trade between Qing and Japan was interrupted.
In the late Joseon period, the trade between Joseon and Japan was developed with a focus on private trade. After the seventeenth century, the private trade was developed in two types - one is the trade between ginseng from Joseon and silver from Japan and the other is the intermediate trade done by Joseon between raw-silk fabrics from China and silver from Japan. The trade between ginseng and silver dramatically changed since the 1750s and so the intermediate trade between raw-silk fabrics and silver since the 1740s. In the nineteenth century, cowhide from Joseon and copper from Japan were main goods for the private trade.
Although the private trade accounted for approximately 70% in the 1720s and 1730s, it decreased to approximately 20% between the 1810s and 1840s. Accordingly, the private trade declined. Even though the private trade declined, it was not entirely lost. Nevertheless, some Japanese researchers said that the private trade was abolished in the 1770s. This is based on the position of the Tsushima han in Japan. They tried to have financial support from the Japanese government, the Tokugawa Shogunate, on the pretext that the private trade was abolished.
There is a dominant view that the decisive reason for the declination of private trade is that Japan conducted direct trade with Qing in Nagasaki since the 1740s and 1750s. In other words, the intermediate trade conducted by Joseon had been declined since the direct trade in Nagasaki. The approximately 80 percent of the exports in private trade was exported by the intermediate trade. Therefore, the declination of intermediate trade was directly linked to the declination of private trade.
The direct trade between Qing and Japan was interrupted between 1661 and 1684. In 1684, Qing Dynasty lifted the sea ban(海禁 ; Haijin). However, the lifting of the ban was not directly linked to the development of trade in both countries. Since 1685, the basic trade policy in Japan against Qing Dynasty was the trade control policy. The same applied to the Japanese trade policy against Joseon Dynasty. Therefore, we consider that it is necessary to correct the claim that there was a large change in the trade between Joseon and Japan, Joseon and Japan in the 1720s or 1730s by the effect of the direct trade between Qing and Japan in Nagasaki. In particular, we think that too much emphasis should not been placed upon the intermediate trade conducted by Joseon during the direct trade between Qing and Japan was interrupted.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-12-02 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 지역과역사 -> 지역과 역사 | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 신청제한 (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | KCI후보 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.81 | 0.74 | 1.558 | 0.2 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)