조건부가치추정법을 활용한 제주지역 해외수용력 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The increase in national income, the expansion of transportation network, the increase in leisure time, and the influx of foreign tourists in the era of internationalization, the influx of the outside population of Jeju region increased rapidly until 2020. However, the corona 19 (Covid-19) incident that began in January 2020 has hit the entire industry, and the tourism industry in Jeju has also been greatly damaged. However, in the second half of 2020, with some calming of the Corona 19 situation and difficult to leave overseas, the number of visitors to Jeju Island is increasing again as Koreans choose Jeju Island as their domestic tourism. This study analyzed the capacity of Jeju’s external population based on the Contingent Valuation Method, and based on this, attempted to suggest policy recommendations for Jeju.
The size of accommodations such as the density of visitors, toilets, and rest areas were excluded from consideration, and the level of securing the parking lot already exceeded the capacity, and the rate of securing the parking lot was 93.4%. In the case of accommodation, the total number of available rooms is 88,691, even if one guest per room is assumed, which is 32,372,215 per year, which is sufficient in terms of visitor capacity.
To analyze the aspects of psychological capacity, this study analyzed whether the residents are feeling psychological discomfort through three methods of road congestion, garbage disposal, and sewage treatment through Contingent Valuation Method. However, the inconvenience caused by the increase of visitors and the effect of continuous population influx is working in combination, and it has the limitation that the effects of these independent factors cannot be specifically separated. As a result of the study, discomfort has already been recognized in terms of psychological capacity among the factors of capacity, and it was estimated that a cost of about 45 billion won per year was incurred as a result of deriving psychological costs through Contingent Valuation Method. In the future, a policy review is needed to resolve or maintain the perception of this discomfort through continuous management. Accordingly, it is necessary to recognize that the increase of visitors leads to the psychological discomfort of the residents, and to seek a policy alternative that can simultaneously increase the number of visitors and the comfort of the residence.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 오규식, "지속가능한 도시환경을 달성하기 위한 통합적 도시 수용력 평가체계 수립" 대한국토·도시계획학회 37 (37): 7-26, 2002
• 2 김영미, "생태관광축제로서 함평나비축제의 상품개발과정, 성공요인 및 평가" 한국관광연구학회 21 (21): 459-484, 2007
• 3 김선희, "관광지의 적정 수용력 산정과 관리 방안 연구- 광릉지역을 사례로 -" 대한지리학회 40 (40): 321-334, 2005
• 4 Lucas, R. C., "Wilderness Perception and Use: The Example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area" 3 (3): 394-400, 1964
• 5 O'Reilly, A. M., "Tourism carrying capacity : concept and issues" 7 (7): 254-258, 1986
• 6 Kim, Seung-woo, "Statistical Properties of Willingness-To-Pay Measurements in CVM Studies" 1997 : 1-19, 1993
• 7 Wagar, J. V. K., "Some major principles in recreation land-use planning" 49 (49): 431-435, 1951
• 8 Arrow, K., "Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation" 58 (58): 4601-4614, 1993
• 9 Penfold, J. W., "Preservation of national park values, Conservation Foundation"
• 10 Daily, G. C., "Population, sustainability, and Earth's carrying capacity" 42 (42): 761-771, 1992
• 11 Park, Seok-hee, "New Tourism Resource" Ilsinbook 1995
• 12 "Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries"
• 13 Ramdas, M., "Impacts of tourism on environmental attributes, environmental literacy and willingness to pay: A conceptual and theoretical review" 144 : 378-391, 2014
• 14 Hastie, T., "Generalized Additive Models" 1 (1): 297-318, 1986
• 15 Wager, J. A., "Forest Service Monograph7" Society of American Foresters 1964
• 16 Cameron, T. A., "Efficient estimation methods for" closed-ended" contingent valuation surveys" 269-276, 1987
• 17 Ma, P., "Development of an index system for evaluation of ecological carrying capacity of marine ecosystems" 144 : 23-30, 2017
• 18 Shelby, B., "Carrying capacity in recreation settings" Oregon State University Press 1987
• 19 Godschalk, D. R., "Carrying Capacity: A Key to Environmental Planning?" 30 (30): 160-165, 1975
• 20 Getz, D., "Capacity to absorb tourism: Concepts and implications for strategic planning" 10 (10): 239-263, 1983
• 21 Cao, G., "Assessment of the ecological security based on the ecological carrying capacity" IEEE 7285-7288, 2016
• 22 Wang, E., "Assessing recreation carrying capacity of the environment attributes based on visitors’ willingness to pay" (22) : 965-976, 2017
• 23 Surendran, A., "An economic analysis of willingness to pay (WTP) for conserving the biodiversity" 637-648, 2010
• 24 Ji, Bong-goo, "A Study on the Measurement of Optional Carrying Capacity in the National Parks" (5) : 145-167, 1997
• 25 Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, "2020 January Jeju tourist statistics" Jeju Special Self-Governing Province 1-, 2020