중국 근로자파견 허용범위의 문제점 및 개선안

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The worker dispatch in China took place with having been begun the reform and opening. The original Temporary Agency Work system in China is following Labor Contract Law that was enforced from 2008. This is the first national legislation pertinent to the worker dispatch in China. At the 30th conference for the Standing Committee of the 11th National People"s Congress on December 28, 2012 after the enforcement of 「Labor Contract Law」 , the revised bill for 「Labor Contract Law」 was passed, thereby having taken effect from July 1, 2013.
Seeing the legal regulations and the revision process concretely regarding the permissible range of worker dispatch, the allowable range given the initial legislation was stipulated to be a division with less than 6 months for a term of existence in the range of “temporaryity, subsidiarity, substitutivity.” By the way, the ambiguity of the permitted limit to worker dispatch following the legislation led to a sharp increase in the worker dispatch. A law-making organ recognized that the ambiguity of the permitted limit to worker dispatch is one of a cause, thereby having come to make legal revisions. The revised law, which was enforced from July 1, 2013, rigidly conceded the permitted limit to worker dispatch just within the range of “temporaryity, subsidiarity, substitutivity,” thereby having reduced the scope of the worker dispatch. 「Provisional Regulations for the Dispatch of Workers」 quantified a company"s dispatched workers.
However, a demerit in which the permissible range of “temporaryity, subsidiarity, substitutivity” for the worker dispatch exists itself makes employee dispatchers and employment users inflict a loss on a legal right of dispatched workers because of disguising the worker dispatch with a method such as labor outsourcing, a personnel agent or out-tasking, thereby causing a bigger social issue. Also, the use of substitutivity task is leading to applying the worker dispatch in the long term.
Seeing the regulations of 「Act on the Protection, Etc. of Temporary Agency Workers」 in south Korea, the range of worker dispatch is limited to 26 target businesses and is available for the dispatch period up to 2 years. Given continuing to use a dispatched worker with exceeding 2 years in violation of this, it led to being defined as the employment of a dispatched worker from the next day of being expired 2 years. The definite industry regulations of worker dispatch drew the clear line in using dispatched workers. In addition, South Korea has even specific occupational classification rules in accordance with this. This application scope on worker dispatch in South Korea is regarded as a good legislation case pertinent to the permissible range of worker dispatch in China.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 중국 근로자파견의 허용범위에 관한 규정
• Ⅲ. 한국의 파견근로 허용범위에 대한 규정
• Ⅳ. 개선안
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이희성, "중국의 근로자파견제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 법학연구소 35 (35): 73-94, 2019
• 2 朱懂理, "浅析劳务派遣岗位辅助性的法律问题" (5) : 2013
• 3 俞贺楠, "我国劳务外包与劳务派遣关联性研究综述" (9) : 2013
• 4 全总劳务派遣问题课题组, "当前我国劳务派遣用工现状调查" (5) : 2012
• 5 王天玉, "劳动派遣规制的重点与法律对策" (5) : 2013
• 6 常凯主, "劳动合同法立法理论难点解析" 中国劳动社会保障出版社 2008
• 7 董保华, "劳务派遣问题中的应有之义劳务派遣超常法制的堵与疏" (8) : 2012
• 8 焦艳玲, "劳务派遣范围的再思考兼评劳动合同法修正案" (3) : 2014
• 9 孙冰心, "劳务派遣法律规制研究" 吉林大学 2008
• 10 周国良, "关于劳务派遣同工同酬与三性认定问题的思考" (5) : 2012
• 11 赵耀, "三性之于劳务派遣利器还是桎梏兼论我国劳务派遣的制度重构" (2) : 2014
• 12 赵耀, "三性之于劳务派遣利器还是桎梏-兼论我国劳务派遣的制度重构" (2) : 2014