KCI등재후보
녹갈색 경관의 생태학 : 도시환경에서의 야생지 개념 및 자연문학 장르 재고 = Ecology of Greenish Brown Landscape: The Concept of Wilderness in Urban Environment and Nature Writing Genre Reconsidered
저자
신두호 (강원대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2009
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
81-120(40쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
0
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
Deep ecological perspectives have predominantly characterized the development
of ecocriticism from its incipiency in the early 1990s, and, consequently,
ecocriticism has been incapacitated in its analysis of the urban environments.
Instead it has given a preference for pristine wilderness as a thematic
subject and nature writing of wilderness as a defining genre. Being confronted
with ever worsening environmental degradations on our own home grounds
and facing the ensuing challenges within and without to the narrowness of
such subject matters and genres, ecocriticism has grafted perspectives of
social ecology whose central tenets can be described as a set of beliefs
that integrates the study of human and natural ecosystems through
understanding the interrelationships of culture and nature. This distaff
branch of ecocriticism that is grounded on social ecology pays attention to
human environments, especially the urban environments.
This shift toward social ecocriticism, which has become a prominent
tendency in the post-2000 ecocriticism school, has brought about two
consequences: a change of concept of nature and wilderness, on the one
hand, and a change of the status of nature writing, on the other. Nature
is now understood as human landscape and environment rather than pristine
wilderness whereas wilderness as neglected, unattended, violence-rampant
urban ghettos and the people residing there. With wilderness fetishism
waning as a result of the graft of sociological perspectives, ecocriticism's feverish interest in nature writing has been decreased and fiction genre
instead has gained much attention by social ecocritical study.
Ecocriticism’s sociological perspectives on the urban nature and environments
as such, however, entail some problems that should not be left unnoticed.
First, by foregrounding pending problems of urban environmental destructions
and relevant social inequalities, ecocriticism pays little attention to physical
nature and wilderness (in a traditional sense) which can be found in urban
environment and our home backyard as well as in pristine wilderness
areas. Appreciation of beauty and value of such nature existence is still
important for city dwellers in fostering ecological and environmental
consciousness. Second, the presupposition of social ecocriticism that nature
writing deals with pristine wilderness only, and that thus it is not a
proper genre for the subjects of the urban environment matters results in
the negligence of paying attention to urban nature writing. Contemporary
urban nature writers such as Charles Siebert, Lisa Couturier, Michael
Rockland demonstrate that nature, or wilderness can also be found in our
urban environments, and that modified and harmed nature of urban environment
as well can or should be a proper subject to nature writing genre.
Deep ecological perspectives have predominantly characterized the development
of ecocriticism from its incipiency in the early 1990s, and, consequently,
ecocriticism has been incapacitated in its analysis of the urban environments.
Instead it has given a preference for pristine wilderness as a thematic
subject and nature writing of wilderness as a defining genre. Being confronted
with ever worsening environmental degradations on our own home grounds
and facing the ensuing challenges within and without to the narrowness of
such subject matters and genres, ecocriticism has grafted perspectives of
social ecology whose central tenets can be described as a set of beliefs
that integrates the study of human and natural ecosystems through
understanding the interrelationships of culture and nature. This distaff
branch of ecocriticism that is grounded on social ecology pays attention to
human environments, especially the urban environments.
This shift toward social ecocriticism, which has become a prominent
tendency in the post-2000 ecocriticism school, has brought about two
consequences: a change of concept of nature and wilderness, on the one
hand, and a change of the status of nature writing, on the other. Nature
is now understood as human landscape and environment rather than pristine
wilderness whereas wilderness as neglected, unattended, violence-rampant
urban ghettos and the people residing there. With wilderness fetishism
waning as a result of the graft of sociological perspectives, ecocriticism's feverish interest in nature writing has been decreased and fiction genre
instead has gained much attention by social ecocritical study.
Ecocriticism’s sociological perspectives on the urban nature and environments
as such, however, entail some problems that should not be left unnoticed.
First, by foregrounding pending problems of urban environmental destructions
and relevant social inequalities, ecocriticism pays little attention to physical
nature and wilderness (in a traditional sense) which can be found in urban
environment and our home backyard as well as in pristine wilderness
areas. Appreciation of beauty and value of such nature existence is still
important for city dwellers in fostering ecological and environmental
consciousness. Second, the presupposition of social ecocriticism that nature
writing deals with pristine wilderness only, and that thus it is not a
proper genre for the subjects of the urban environment matters results in
the negligence of paying attention to urban nature writing. Contemporary
urban nature writers such as Charles Siebert, Lisa Couturier, Michael
Rockland demonstrate that nature, or wilderness can also be found in our
urban environments, and that modified and harmed nature of urban environment
as well can or should be a proper subject to nature writing genre.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2019-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | KCI후보 |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2014-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
2013-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (기타) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) | KCI후보 |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) | KCI후보 |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | KCI후보 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.16 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.13 | 0.09 | 0.443 | 0.07 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)