고려전기 금석문 소재 불교의례와 그 특징 = Buddhist rituals mirrored in the epigraph materials of the early half period of Goyreo, and their characteristics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Epigraph materials are important historical records, as they contain references to facts that happened in the same period the very materials were created. And among them, epitaphs made for Buddhist priests or memorial inscriptions found inside tombs are materials created for specific individuals. So by utilizing these materials, one could overcome the disadvantage that could come by using only written documents(historical texts in the form of books), which could merely be reflecting certain Neo-Confucian views or state-centered perceptions of the time they were written. And it goes without saying that studies of Buddhist rituals can also benefit from using epigraph materials.
Epigraph materials which documented the lifetime of deeds of a Buddhist priest let us know all kinds of Buddhist rituals that were personally observed by such particular individual priest. Also they contain records of time periods which we cannot fully enough examine through conventional historial records, such as the time period from King Taejo to King Mokjong. So their importance in this regard is significant. New Buddhist rituals (at least to today's scholars) that were never heard of before, could be found and examined through these materials. And these records would usually reveal not only the ritual itself (as they are when they are recorded in written texts) but also what actually happened before and after the ritual, allowing us to see what was the general nature of the entire situation.
determining what would have been chosen to be documented within this kind of record in the first place. Epigraph materials usually select and record particularly notable things out of a person's life. Normal, routine things are left out. And then there is the issue of determining who would have deserved such an epigraph record. Buddhist priests whose lives are documented with these epigraph materials were usually the ones who served as National or Royal priests. As a result, the Buddhist rituals that were observed by Buddhist schools, from which either National or Royal priests were never summoned, would never be recorded through this type of records.
Yet with all these potential weakness as a historical record, the epigraph materials could not only complement existing historical documents, but also fill in the gaps that could never be filled with conventional written texts. So one could say that they should be fully utilized in the studies of Buddhist rituals.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 국가적 불교의례
• 2. 개인 및 사찰의 불교의례
• 3. 금석문을 통해 본 불교의례의 특징
• 맺음말
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 남동신, "羅末麗初 華嚴宗團의 대응과 ≪(華嚴)神衆經≫의 성립" 5 : 1993
• 2 김종명, "한국 중세의 불교의례" 문학과 지성사 2001
• 3 김용선, "역주 고려묘지명집성 상" 한림대 출판부 2006
• 4 안계현, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 6" 국사편찬위원회 1975
• 5 홍윤식, "불교행사의 성행 in: 한국사 16" 국사편찬위원회 1994
• 6 김두진, "불교사상의 전개 in: 한국사" 국사편찬위원회 1994
• 7 안지원, "고려의 국가 불교의례와 문화" 서울대출판부 2005
• 8 김영미, "고려시대 불교와 전염병 치유문화" 이화사학연구소 (34) : 123-160, 2007
• 9 김영태, "高麗歷代王의 信佛과 國難打開의 佛事" 14 : 74-81, 1977
• 10 서윤길, "高麗의 護國法會와 道場" 14 : 1977
• 11 김상현, "高麗時代의 護國佛敎 연구" 단국대 대학원 1 : 1976
• 12 박윤진, "高麗時代 王師․國師 硏究" 경인문화사 2006
• 13 김형우, "高麗時代 國家的 佛敎行事에 대한 硏究" 동국대 1992
• 14 한기문, "高麗寺院의 構造와 機能" 민족사 171-, 1998
• 15 서윤길, "高麗密敎思想史硏究" 불광출판사 1993
• 16 "高麗史節要"
• 17 "高麗史"
• 18 허흥식, "高麗佛敎史硏究" 일조각 1997
• 19 김혜완, "高麗 前期의 彌勒信仰 in: 阜村 申延澈교수 정년기념논총" 1995
• 20 허흥식, "韓國金石全文 上" 아세아문화사 1984
• 21 "韓國佛敎全書 권 4"
• 22 "漢和大辭典 권11"
• 23 이지관, "校勘譯註 歷代高僧碑文 고려편 3" 가산불교문화연구원 1996
• 24 이지관, "校勘譯註 歷代高僧碑文 고려편 2" 가산불교문화연구원 1995
• 25 "東文選"
• 26 "大正藏"
• 27 "三國遺事"
• 28 홍윤식, "≪高麗史≫ 世家篇 佛敎記事의 歷史的 意味" 60 : 1988