빈칸채우기검사의 연구 동향: 척도유형과 특성을 중심으로 = A Review of maze studies: Focused on the scale types and characteristics of the measurement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was to examine trends and types of maze which can be used as a progress-monitoring tool and offered implication as the decision-making method for the students at risk and with reading disabilities. 39 journal articles published domestically and abroad from 2000 to 2015 were analyzed to identify research trends, study sample, types of measure, technical adequacy, and purpose of measure. The study found that maze studies have been ongoing and especially have been increased significantly since 2010. Additionally, although 3minutes, every n-th words deleted maze task, as the traditional form, was the most commonly used, some researches have examined the question of whether the maze identifies reading sub-skills such as individual differences in reading comprehension. Implication for instructional practice and future application of maze as CBM in Korea were described.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 국내외 빈칸채우기검사들의 유형과 특성을 종합적으로 살펴보고, 의사결정 및 모니터링 점검을 위한 형성평가로 사용 될 수 있는 빈칸채우기검사의 적합한 유형, 형식, 활용방안을 제안하고자 하였다. 이에 2000년 이후 부터 2015년까지 국내외 학술저널에 출간된 39편의 빈칸채우기검사 관련 연구들을 분석대상 논문으로 선정하여 검사대상, 검사목적 및 활용, 측정학적 적합성, 검사구성에 따라 분석하였다. 그 결과, 빈칸채우기검사 연구는 2010년 이후 활발하게 진행되어져 오고 있으며, 규칙적으로 n번째 단어 및 어절을 삭제하는 방식으로 3분 동안 측정하는 유형이 가장 많았으나 최근에 들어 구체적인 읽기 능력을 측정하기 위하여 문장을 삭제, 의도적으로 기능어, 내용어를 삭제하고, 빈칸의 속성을 묻는 등의 다양한 유형의 빈칸채우기검사 연구가 진행되고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 검사의 측정요인은 전반적인 읽기 능력, 문법 산출력, 언어발달, 이해력 등으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 분석 결과에 따라 앞으로의 빈칸채우기검사 연구의 방향성 및 한국형 교육과정중심측정 빈칸채우기검사에 대한 시사점을 논의에서 제안하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 여승수, "한국 교육과정중심측정(CBM)의 연구 동향: 측정학적 적합성을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 187-213, 2014
• 2 정광조, "학습장애의 새로운 진단 평가 방식에 대한 현장의 반응연구-특수교육지원센타를중심으로-" 2015 (2015): 704-719, 2015
• 3 김동일, "학습장애 판별의 중재반응모형을 위한 다단계 성장모형의 활용 가능성 탐색" 한국특수교육학회 44 (44): 195-211, 2009
• 4 김동일, "특수교육지원센터의 학습장애 선별 및 진단과정에 대한 탐색적 연구: 현행 지침 시행과 개선방향에 대한 시사점을 중심으로" 교육연구소 13 (13): 253-283, 2012
• 5 박수자, "초등학생의 읽기 후 질문 생성 양상에 관한 고찰" 46 : 55-76, 2013
• 6 박승호, "중학생의 읽기이해 증진을 위한 초인지 중심의 교수-학습자료개발 및 중재프로그램의 효과 연구" 한국교육심리학회 16 (16): 51-66, 2002
• 7 김윤옥, "읽기진단검사" 도서출판 특수교육 2001
• 8 우정한, "읽기장애학생의 언어능력과 읽기능력에 관한 연구" 한국특수교육문제연구소 11 (11): 163-183, 2010
• 9 배소영, "읽기부진 아동의 문법형태소 사용력" 한국언어치료학회 21 (21): 17-37, 2012
• 10 여승수, "읽기 학습장애 학생을 위한 한글 어절선택(maze) 읽기 CBM의 활용 가능성 탐색: 신뢰도와 타당도의 검증을 바탕으로" 한국학습장애학회 12 (12): 1-20, 2015
• 11 이일화, "읽기 유창성과 독해력 수준과의 관계: 초등학교 저학년 학생을 중심으로" 한국교육심리학회 17 (17): 239-256, 2003
• 12 조용구, "읽기 능력 측정을 위한 빈칸 메우기 검사 도구의 개발" 한국독서학회 (30) : 465-491, 2013
• 13 조현재, "생물 교과서의 이독성 측정 도구로서 Cloze 검사의 적용 방법에 대한 연구. 생물교육" 28 (28): 348-355, 2000
• 14 홍지선, "빈칸 메우기 검사의 채점 방법에 관한 연구" 한국국어교육학회 (80) : 497-514, 2008
• 15 박정진, "빈 칸 메우기 검사의 타당성 연구" 한국초등국어교육학회 (28) : 67-90, 2005
• 16 김동일, "미래 학습장애 교육 디자인: 한국적 과제와 전망" 한국학습장애학회 12 (12): 1-18, 2015
• 17 박수자, "문맥의 특성과 읽기 지도" 한국초등국어교육학회 (39) : 157-188, 2009
• 18 최인희, "만화 텍스트 빈칸 메우기 전략을 활용한 읽기 학습이 흥미 및 학업성취에 미치는 영향" 한국교육심리학회 22 (22): 215-234, 2008
• 19 마송희, "동시 재구성 활동에 나타난 유아의 구문능력에 관한 연구" 한국영유아보육학회 (65) : 147-167, 2010
• 20 김동일, "기초학습기능 수행평가체제: 읽기검사(Basic Academic Skill Assesment- BASA)" 학지사-학지심리검사연구소 2008
• 21 고춘화, "국어과 평가도구로서의 낱말깁기검사 연구" 국어교육학회(since1969) (43) : 1-32, 2008
• 22 이대식, "국내 학습장애 분야 이론과 실제의 현황과 과제" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 129-158, 2014
• 23 정지윤, "경도지적장애인의 마음읽기와 언어발달에 관한 연구" 한국특수교육문제연구소 15 (15): 375-394, 2014
• 24 Wayman, M. M., "Using curriculum-based measurement to monitor secondary English language learners’ responsiveness to peer-mediated reading instruction" 26 (26): 308-332, 2010
• 25 Graney, S. B., "Universal Screening of Reading in Late Elementary School : R-CBM versus CBM Maze" 31 : 368-377, 2009
• 26 Foegen, A., "Translating Research Into Practice Preservice Teachers' Beliefs About Curriculum-Based Measurement" 34 (34): 226-236, 2001
• 27 Compton, "Tracking children who fly below the radar : Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability" 18 (18): 329-337, 2008
• 28 Fuch, L. S., "The validity of informal reading comprehension measures" 9 (9): 20-28, 1988
• 29 January, S A., "The impact of context and word type on students’ maze task accuracy" 41 (41): 262-271, 2012
• 30 McCane-bowling, S. J., "The Utility of Maze Accurate Response Rate in Assessing Reading Comprehension in Upper Elementary and Middle School Students" 51 (51): 789-800, 2014
• 31 Hosp, M. K., "The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement" Guilford Press 2012
• 32 Shinn, J., "Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth" 34 (34): 164-172, 2000
• 33 Brown-chidsey, R., "Sources of variation in curriculum-based measures of silent reading" 40 (40): 363-377, 2003
• 34 Jenkins, J. R., "Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework" 36 (36): 582-600, 2007
• 35 Lipka, O., "Retrospective analyses of the reading development of grade 4 students with reading disabilities: Risk status and profiles over 5 years" 39 (39): 364-378, 2006
• 36 Fuchs, D., "Responsiveness-to-Intervention : Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct" 18 (18): 157-171, 2003
• 37 Vaughn, S., "Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties" 18 (18): 338-345, 2008
• 38 Silberglitt, B., "Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores : A longtitudinal comparison of grade levels" 43 (43): 527-535, 2006
• 39 Yeo, S., "Relation between CBM-R and CBM-mR slopes : An application of latent growth modeling" 37 (37): 147-158, 2012
• 40 Vaughn, S., "Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction : The promise and potential problems" 18 (18): 137-146, 2003
• 41 Ticha, R., "Reading progress monitoring for secondary-school students : Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to growth of reading aloud and Maze selection measures" 24 (24): 132-142, 2009
• 42 Tolar, T. D., "Psychometric properties of maze tasks in middle school students" 37 (37): 131-146, 2012
• 43 Wiley, H. I., "Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment" 26 (26): 207-214, 2005
• 44 Fuchs, L. S., "Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum?" 61 (61): 15-24, 1994
• 45 Wayman, M. M., "Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading" 4 (4): 85-120, 2007
• 46 Allinder, R. M., "Improving fluency in at-risk readers and students with learning disabilities" 22 (22): 48-54, 2001
• 47 Allison, J. R., "Identifying struggling readers in middle school with ORF, Maze, and prior year assessment data" 1 (1): 35-44, 2011
• 48 Fuch, L. S., "Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress" 21 (21): 45-58, 1992
• 49 Speece, D. L., "Identifying Children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems" 39 (39): 258-276, 2010
• 50 Mercer, S. H., "Generalizability theory analysis of CBM Maze reliability in third-through fifth-grade students" 37 (37): 183-190, 2012
• 51 Marchand, G. C., "Formative, informative, and summative assessment : The relationship among curriculum-based measurement of reading, classroom engagement, and reading performance" 51 (51): 659-676, 2014
• 52 Fuch, L. S., "Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect?" 22 (22): 27-48, 1993
• 53 Twyman, T., "Extending Curriculum-Based Measurement into Middle/Secondary Schools : The Technical Adequacy of the Concept Maze" 24 (24): 49-67, 2007
• 54 김동일, "Exploring students at risk for reading comprehension difficulties in South Korea: the RTI approach applying latent class growth analysis" 교육연구소 15 (15): 633-643, 2014
• 55 Jenkins, J. R., "Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching : Reading aloud and maze" 59 (59): 421-432, 1993
• 56 Ardoin, S. P., "Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probes when conducting universal screening" 33 : 218-233, 2004
• 57 Jenkins, J. R., "Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring" 75 (75): 151-163, 2009
• 58 Fuchs, L. S., "Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement" 58 (58): 232-243, 1991
• 59 Deno, S. L., "Developments in Curriculum-based measurement" 37 (37): 184-192, 2003
• 60 Carlson, S. E., "Development of a new reading comprehension assessment : Identifying comprehension differences among readers" 32 : 40-53, 2014
• 61 Hosp, M. K., "Curriculum-based measurement for reading, spelling, and math : How to do it and why" 48 (48): 10-17, 2003
• 62 Deno, S. L., "Curriculum-based measurement : The emerging alternative" 52 (52): 219-232, 1985
• 63 Espin, C., "Creating a progress-monitoring system in reading for middle-school students : Tracking progress toward meeting high-stakes standards" 25 (25): 60-75, 2010
• 64 Fore III, C., "Concurrent and predictive criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measurement for students with emotional and behavioral disorders" 22 (22): 24-32, 2007
• 65 Brown-Chidsey, R., "Comparison of grade-level controlled and literature-based maze CBM reading passages" 34 (34): 387-, 2005
• 66 Rankin, E. F., "Comparable cloze and multiple-choice comprehension test scores" 13 (13): 193-198, 1969
• 67 Decker, D. M., "Classification accuracy of oral reading fluency and maze in predicting performance in large-scale reading assessments" 51 (51): 625-635, 2014
• 68 Hale, A. D., "An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using maze assessment procedures" 48 (48): 4-13, 2011
• 69 Yeo, S., "An investigation of gender, income, and special education status bias on curriculum-based measurement slope in reading" 26 (26): 119-130, 2011
• 70 Deshler, D. D., "Adolescent literacy: Where we are- Where we need to go" Guilford 2007